ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05530798Updated Oct 15, 2026Results posted

CEUS For Intraoperative Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Definity Perflutren Lipid Microsphere Ultrasound Contrast in Spine Disease, Spinal Stenosis and Spinal Injury, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Primary conditionSpinal StenosisRegistry: Spinal DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Spinal Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Spinal Stenosis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Spinal Stenosis, a narrower term within Spinal Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Updated Oct 15, 2026Posted results revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spinal cord injury following posterior decompression in patients suffering from chronic, cervicothoracic spinal cord compression is a known complication with multiple etiologies. Currently, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) remains the gold standard for predicting and preventing post-operative deficits from these procedures. However, there is a paucity in the field of spine surgery for further, non-invasive biomarkers that can help detect and prognosticate the degree of spinal cord injury intraoperatively. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a radiation free imaging modality that utilizes nanobubble technology to allow for visualization of the macro- and microvascular architecture of soft tissue structures. Despite being currently approved for the use in hepatology and cardiology, it has remained absent from the field of spinal cord injury. The study team aims to evaluate and quantify micro- and macrovascular changes that lead to areas of hyper-perfusion as well as areas of ischemia intraoperatively in patients that undergo elective cervicothoracic posterior decompression for chronic compression. In addition, the study team aims to assess the efficacy of CEUS in detecting microvascular changes that correlate with IONM changes and predicting degree and recovery of post-operative neurologic deficits from intraoperative spinal cord injury. The study team hypothesizes that following decompression, subjects will have detectable levels of microvascular changes causing areas of hypoperfusion and reperfusion injury. Second, the study team hypothesizes that these perfusion changes will correlate with intraoperative neuromonitoring changes and can predict and prognosticate the degree of post-operative neurologic injury.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spine Disease
  • Spinal Stenosis
  • Spinal Injury
  • Spinal Cord Diseases
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Spinal Cord Compression
  • Spine Degeneration

Keywords

  • Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound
  • CEUS
03

In context

Spinal Stenosis Reclassified

458 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Stenosis; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 80 across 281 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Stenosis.

Browse Spinal Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 874 studies on the registry; 166 are open to participants now.

Of its 131 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (79%) have results posted.

Compared within Spinal Stenosis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Spinal Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients consented and scheduled for posterior cervicothoracic decompression surgery with the PI for the diagnosis of cervicothoracic myeloradiculopathy
  • Age 18-80

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Patient's with known to ultrasound contrast
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to perflutren lipid microsphere or its components, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG)
  • Patients unable to actively participate in the consent process physically and/or cognitively
  • Prior decompression at the intended level of decompression
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm

    Device: Definity Perflutren Lipid Microsphere Ultrasound Contrast

Interventions

  • DeviceDefinity Perflutren Lipid Microsphere Ultrasound Contrast

    1. Before the spinal decompression surgery has started, the study team will inject the ultrasound contrast to visualize the spinal cord prior to decompression of the spinal cord. 2. After the spinal cord has been decompressed, the study team will inject the ultrasound contrast to visualize the spinal cord directly after decompression of the spinal cord. 3. Prior to completion and closure of the incision, the study team will once more inject the ultrasound contrast to visualize the spinal cord. 4. A member of the research team will follow up with study participants within a week of the procedure by phone. The research staff will also review the participants' medical record for up to 360 days after your procedure to collect information on clinical outcomes and any additional treatments, tests or procedures the study participants may have had.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Spinal Cord Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Signal Intensity Before and After Surgical Decompression

    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images were obtained intraoperatively before and after spinal cord decompression. Signal intensity (echogenicity) within the spinal cord at the decompressed segment was quantified from CEUS images and measured in dB/MHz/cm. The outcome measure was the change in signal intensity from pre-decompression imaging to post-decompression imaging. A positive value indicates increased perfusion signal following decompression, while a negative value indicates decreased perfusion signal.

    Time frame: Intra-operative (approximately 3 hours)

07

Results

Posted Sep 4, 2026
Limitations and caveats
This study has several limitations. Primarily, the small sample size limits generalizability and introduces potential sampling error. In addition, surgeries and imaging were performed by 2 surgeons, introducing variability in surgical and sonographic technique. Future work should involve multicenter, prospective trials using standardized protocols, with long-term clinical follow-up to build a large dataset allowing for a more robust assessment of the correlation of CEUS spinal cord perfusion ind

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm
Started20
Completed20
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change in Spinal Cord Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Signal Intensity Before and After Surgical Decompression

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images were obtained intraoperatively before and after spinal cord decompression. Signal intensity (echogenicity) within the spinal cord at the decompressed segment was quantified from CEUS images and measured in dB/MHz/cm. The outcome measure was the change in signal intensity from pre-decompression imaging to post-decompression imaging. A positive value indicates increased perfusion signal following decompression, while a negative value indicates decreased perfusion signal.

Time frame:
Intra-operative (approximately 3 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · dB/MHz/cm
Mean Change in Spinal Cord Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Signal Intensity Before and After Surgical Decompression
dB/MHz/cmContrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm
Mean Change in Spinal Cord Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Signal Intensity Before and After Surgical Decompression1.3 ± 5.4

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollement until end of follow up, up to 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years15
>=65 years5
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm
Mean68.4 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm
Female10
Male10
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American5
White15
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Arm
United States20
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Results
Posted results revised
revised Oct 15, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • RemovedCorrelation of Perfusion Changes Measured by Intra-operative Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound With Neurologic Outcomes Measured by Serial Neurologic Exams and Functional Outcomes (Frankel Grade and Modified Rankin Scale).Time frame: Clinical Monitoring (12 months)
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    Posted results revised
    Secondary outcomes 1 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • RemovedCorrelation of Perfusion Changes Measured by Intra-operative Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound With Neurologic Outcomes Measured by Serial Neurologic Exams and Functional Outcomes (Frankel Grade and Modified Rankin Scale).Time frame: Clinical Monitoring (12 months)
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05530798
Collaborators
South Carolina Spinal Cord Injury Research Fund
Responsible party
Stephen Kalhorn (Professor-Faculty, Medical University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 7, 2022
Start date
Dec 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2025
Completion
Aug 1, 2025
Results posted
Sep 4, 2026
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Brian F Saway, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina
Stephen Kalhorn, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina
Jessica Barley, PhD
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion