CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05520320HOPE-REALUpdated Apr 22, 2024

Long-term Outcomes After Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion of Donor Livers Using Real-world Data

An observational study in Organ Preservation, Liver Transplantation and Hypothermic Machine Perfusion, sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-22.

Sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,202
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

End-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) of human donor livers mitigates ischemia-reperfusion injury, resulting in a reduction of post-reperfusion syndrome, early allograft dysfunction and biliary complications, when compared with static cold storage. According to IDEAL-D (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long term study-Framework for Devices), with several published randomized controlled trials on short-to-medium term outcomes, scientific evidence for HOPE has currently reached stage 3. Assessment of long-term outcomes after HOPE preservation based on real-world data (i.e., IDEAL-D stage 4) is currently still lacking. Therefore, we aim to conduct an international, multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study to assess long-term outcomes after transplantation of donor livers preserved by hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE).

02

Conditions studied

  • Organ Preservation
  • Liver Transplantation
  • Hypothermic Machine Perfusion

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hypothermia

498 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypothermia; 53 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,202 is above the median of 97 across 126 observational studies indexed under Hypothermia.

Browse Hypothermia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Groningen is the lead sponsor of 609 studies on the registry; 174 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients (>18 years) undergoing liver transplantation of donor livers preserved with end-ischemic HOPE.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (>18 years) who underwent liver transplantation of donor livers preserved with end-ischemic HOPE (including donation after normothermic regional perfusion) between 01.01.2012 and 31.12.2021.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Simultaneous multiorgan transplantations, sequential normothermic machine perfusion (e.g., DHOPE-COR-NMP, but not NRP), living partial liver donation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,202 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceHypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (any device)

    After static cold storage, all grafts included in this study are subjected to \>1 hour of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion at 4-12°C with an acellular perfusion solution.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Death-censored graft survival, assessed by survival analysis methods

    Defined as time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or death due to graft dysfunction

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall graft survival

    Defined as time from liver transplantation until re-transplantation or all-cause death

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  2. Overall patient survival

    Defined as time from liver transplantation until all-cause death

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  3. Arterial and biliary complication-free survival (ABCFS)

    Defined as time from liver transplantation until occurrence of an arterial or biliary complication of Dindo-Clavien grade ≥3, dated at the time of interventional, endoscopic, or surgical treatment required to correct it (Savier E, De Rycke Y, Lim C, et al. Novel Composite Endpoint for Assessing Outcomes in Liver Transplantation: Arterial and Biliary Complication-Free Survival. Liver Transpl. 2022;28(1):75-87. doi:10.1002/lt.26269)

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  4. Incidence of biliary complications

    Defined as a composite of: * Non-anastomotic biliary strictures: any irregularity or narrowing of the lumen of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic donor bile ducts, excluding the biliary anastomosis, diagnosed with the use of cholangiography in combination with clinical symptoms (e.g., jaundice or cholangitis) or an elevation of cholestatic laboratory variables, in the presence of a patent hepatic artery * Anastomotic biliary strictures: strictures occurring at the anastomosis of donor choledochal duct and recipient choledochal duct or jejunal Roux-limb * Biliary leakage: fluid with an elevated (\>3x serum) bilirubin level in the abdominal drain or intra-abdominal fluid on or after post-operative day 3 or the need for radiological intervention (i.e. interventional drainage) owing to biliary collections or re-laparotomy due to biliary peritonitis

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  5. Incidence of vascular complications

    Defined as a composite of: * Hepatic arterial thrombosis: radiologically or surgically proven thrombosis of the hepatic artery * Portal vein thrombosis: radiologically or surgically proven thrombosis of the portal vein * Venous outflow tract obstruction: radiologically or surgically proven thrombosis of the main hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  6. Incidence of acute cellular rejection

    Defined as biopsy proven Banff grade 2 or 3 rejection (Demetris AJ, Bellamy C, Hübscher SG, et al. 2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(10):2816-2835. doi:10.1111/ajt.13909)

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  7. Incidence of chronic rejection

    Defined as histopathological evidence of immunologic injury with irreversible damage to the bile ducts, arteries, and veins (Demetris A, Adams D, Bellamy C, et al. Update of the International Banff Schema for Liver Allograft Rejection: working recommendations for the histopathologic staging and reporting of chronic rejection. An International Panel. Hepatology. 2000;31(3):792-799. doi:10.1002/hep.510310337)

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  8. Incidence of re-transplantation

    Defined as proportion of patients who underwent liver re-transplantation for any cause

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  9. Incidence of recurrence of primary disease (including recurrence of malignancies)

    Defined as histological or radiologically confirmed recurrence

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  10. Incidence of new-onset chronic kidney disease

    Defined as renal impairment (kidney morphology, pathology, imaging, blood or urine composition abnormalities) persisting for \>3 months with or without eGFR decrease, and/or eGFR \<60 for \>3 months with or without renal impairment (Levey AS, Eckardt K-U, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and Classification of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Position Statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005 Jun;67(6):2089-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x)

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

  11. Incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplantation

    Defined as symptoms of diabetes plus casual plasma glucose levels ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) or 2 hours plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L during an oral glucose tolerance testing (Davidson J, Wilkinson A, Dantal J, et al. New-onset diabetes after transplantation: 2003 International consensus guidelines. Proceedings of an international expert panel meeting. Barcelona, Spain, 19 February 2003. Transplantation. 2003;75(10 Suppl):SS3-24. doi:10.1097/01.TP.0000069952.49242.3E)

    Time frame: Up to 5-years

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University Medical Center Groningen
    Groningen, Netherlands
  • University Hospital Zürich
    Zürich, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05520320
Lead sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen
Collaborators
University of Zurich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 29, 2022
Start date
Aug 24, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2022
Completion
Aug 1, 2023
Last update
Apr 22, 2024

Study contacts

Vincent E de Meijer, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Medical Center Groningen

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion