ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05517395Updated Jun 4, 2024

The Effectiveness of HBM-based Education Program on Improve Knowledge and Behaviors

An interventional study of health nutrition education and usual care in Undernutrition, Stunting and Wasting, sponsored by Taipei Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-04.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The randomized controlled trial design with one intervention arm (nutrition education and complementary feeding) and one control (usual care) arm (1:1 ratio). Randomization of each participant to the groups will be carried out using Random Allocation Software 1.0 (https://random-allocation-oftware.software.informer.com/1.0/) to intervention or control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The sample size to be recruited is 80 participants.

Read the detailed description

The randomized controlled trial design with one intervention arm (nutrition education and complementary feeding) and one control (usual care) arm (1:1 ratio). will be conducted in the second phase. This trial will be conduct in mothers with children aged under 2 years of age of Nusa Tenggara Barat Province of Indonesia.

Randomization of each participant to the groups will be carried out using Random Allocation Software 1.0 (https://random-allocation-oftware.software.informer.com/1.0/) to intervention or control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The randomization will be performed by a research assistant with no access to participant information and who did not participate in the enrolment process. The permuted block randomization for a block size of four and six will be used in order to maintain an adequate balance in the number of participants allocated to each of the study groups. The person performing the intervention will be blinded to group allocation. Outcome data will be collected by another two blinded research assistants, one for the intervention group and one for the control group. The completed and coded questionnaires will be entered into databases by research assistant who unaware of group allocation.

The eligible participant will include mothers who have children under 2 years of ages with undernutrition categories residences in Lombok Barat or Lombok Tengah District, mothers who are able to speak Bahasa or Sasak languages, mothers who are able to use a telephone. The exclusion criteria will include mothers with impaired cognitive function, and psychiatric diseases, children suffering from severe/chronic diseases, mental retardation, physical disability, and with hospitalization within six months are excluded from participating in this study.

A priori power analysis has been calculated to determine an adequate sample size for the study. Prior data indicates that the application of the health belief model to teach complementary feeding messages in Ethiopia is 56%. Using a level of confidence of .05 and power of 80% the required sample size was 36.85 participants, with the consideration of 10% dropout rate, it was around 40 for one group. In total the investigator will aim for final estimate sample size to be recruited is 80.

02

Conditions studied

  • Undernutrition
  • Stunting
  • Wasting
  • Underweight

Keywords

  • Undernutrition
  • Health belief model
  • Children
03

In context

Malnutrition

1,277 studies on the registry are indexed under Malnutrition; 230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is below the median of 118 across 843 interventional studies indexed under Malnutrition.

Browse Malnutrition studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University is the lead sponsor of 257 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mothers who have children under 2 years of ages with undernutrition categories residences in Lombok Barat or Lombok Tengah District,
  • Mothers who are able to speak Bahasa or Sasak languages,
  • Mothers who are able to use a telephone.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mothers with impaired cognitive function, and psychiatric diseases,
  • Children suffering from severe/chronic diseases, mental retardation, physical disability,
  • Children with hospitalization within six months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    health nutrition education

    The participants in intervention group will receive health nutrition education based on a health belief model including nutrition health education (booklet), and telephone call support.

    Behavioral: health nutrition education

  • Active comparator
    usual care

    Control group will only receive usual care. Usual care is routine measurement of children including height, length, weight, head circumference, monitoring children's activities, and monitoring the immunization status of children.

    Behavioral: usual care

Interventions

  • Behavioralhealth nutrition education

    The participants in intervention group will receive health nutrition education based on a health belief model including nutrition health education (booklet), and telephone call support.

  • Behavioralusual care

    Control group will only receive usual care. Usual care is routine measurement of children including height, length, weight, head circumference, monitoring children's activities, and monitoring the immunization status of children.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge of Undernutrition

    The Mother's Knowledge of Child Undernutrition questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother knowledge related to children undernutrition (Mardani et al., 2014), with Cronbach alpha 0.87. This questionnaire consists of 26 items of questions referring to the definition, types, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, management, and prevention of malnutrition in children. Each question has four answer options (A, B, C, D). A correct answer is scored at one point, while a wrong answer is scored at zero. The sum of answers will be calculated to obtain the total knowledge scores for that participant. The item score ranged from 0 to 26. The higher the score, the greater the understanding related to children's undernutrition

    Time frame: before intervention

  2. Knowledge of Undernutrition

    The Mother's Knowledge of Child Undernutrition questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother knowledge related to children undernutrition (Mardani et al., 2014), with Cronbach alpha 0.87. This questionnaire consists of 26 items of questions referring to the definition, types, signs and symptoms, diagnosis, management, and prevention of malnutrition in children. Each question has four answer options (A, B, C, D). A correct answer is scored at one point, while a wrong answer is scored at zero. The sum of answers will be calculated to obtain the total knowledge scores for that participant. The item score ranged from 0 to 26. The higher the score, the greater the understanding related to children's undernutrition

    Time frame: at two weeks after intervention

  3. Complementary Feeding Practice

    The complementary feeding practice questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother's knowledge and competence related to complementary feeding (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.92. This questionnaire contains 29 questions referring to the practice of breastfeeding/complementary feeding, feeding practices based on food safety, responsive feeding practices, and practice of adequate feeding. The answers to this questionnaire are based on two kinds of interval scales: (1) score 0 = if the answer is not recommended, 1 = recommended; and (2) an interval scale with scores of 1 = never, 2 = rarely (1-2 times/week), 3 = sometimes (3-4 times/week), 4 = frequently (5-6 times/week), and 5 = always (every day). The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children. The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children.

    Time frame: before intervention

  4. Complementary Feeding Practice

    The complementary feeding practice questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess mother's knowledge and competence related to complementary feeding (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.92. This questionnaire contains 29 questions referring to the practice of breastfeeding/complementary feeding, feeding practices based on food safety, responsive feeding practices, and practice of adequate feeding. The answers to this questionnaire are based on two kinds of interval scales: (1) score 0 = if the answer is not recommended, 1 = recommended; and (2) an interval scale with scores of 1 = never, 2 = rarely (1-2 times/week), 3 = sometimes (3-4 times/week), 4 = frequently (5-6 times/week), and 5 = always (every day). The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children. The high score indicates that mothers have greater understanding refer to complementary feeding in children.

    Time frame: at two weeks after intervention

  5. Self-efficacy

    The self-efficacy questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess a mother's self-efficacy in feeding children (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.93. This questionnaire includes 28 questions about a healthy diet and food variety; the amount of food; meal cues; meals based on child development; and general efficacy for feeding children. Each question has scale 0-10. The item score ranged from 0 to 280. The higher the number indicates, the more confident. Research assistants will collect the data before and after the intervention

    Time frame: before intervention

  6. Self-efficacy

    The self-efficacy questionnaire. This questionnaire is used to assess a mother's self-efficacy in feeding children (Hajri et al., 2016), with Cronbach alpha 0.93. This questionnaire includes 28 questions about a healthy diet and food variety; the amount of food; meal cues; meals based on child development; and general efficacy for feeding children. Each question has scale 0-10. The item score ranged from 0 to 280. The higher the number indicates, the more confident. Research assistants will collect the data before and after the intervention

    Time frame: at two weeks after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight)

    Secondary outcomes are undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight). They will be measured using WHO Anthro software version 3.2.2 and expressed as Z-scores for each of the anthropometric indices of undernutrition.

    Time frame: before intervention

  2. Undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight)

    Secondary outcomes are undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight). They will be measured using WHO Anthro software version 3.2.2 and expressed as Z-scores for each of the anthropometric indices of undernutrition.

    Time frame: at three months after intervention

  3. Undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight)

    Secondary outcomes are undernutrition (stunting, wasting, and underweight). They will be measured using WHO Anthro software version 3.2.2 and expressed as Z-scores for each of the anthropometric indices of undernutrition.

    Time frame: at six months after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Taipei Medical University
    Taipei county, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05517395
Responsible party
Huang, Hui-Chuan (Ph.D, Taipei Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 26, 2022
Start date
Sep 10, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2022
Completion
Dec 30, 2022
Last update
Jun 4, 2024

Study contacts

Hui-Chuan Huang, Ph.D
principal investigator · Taipei Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion