ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07573995Updated Oct 5, 2026

Feasibility and Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training Combined With Blood Flow Restriction for Frail Older Adults

An interventional study of Exercise and Sham Control in Frailty Syndrome, Older Adults and Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Training Effects, sponsored by Taipei Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Oct 5, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial study aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a combined inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and blood flow restriction (BFR) intervention in frail older adults. Outcomes of interest include feasibility, physical function, respiratory muscle strength, handgrip strength, five-times sit-to-stand performance, body composition, frailty level, fall efficacy, blood pressure, and adverse events.

Read the detailed description

This is a parallel randomized controlled trial. 30 participants who are older adults with frailty will be enrolled.

Eligible participants who complete the baseline measurements will be randomly allocated to a combined BFR and IMT intervention group (N=15) or in the control group with BFR and sham IMT (N=15).

Primary outcomes include feasibility and physical function (i.e., the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and Time Up and Go (TUG) test). Secondary outcomes include respiratory muscle strength, handgrip strength, five-times sit-to-stand performance, body composition, frailty level, fall efficacy, blood pressure, and adverse events. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline (T0) and immediately after the 6-week intervention period (T1) in both groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Frailty Syndrome
  • Older Adults
  • Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Training Effects
  • Inspiratory Muscle Training

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • frailty
  • older adults
  • blood flow restriction
  • inspiratory muscle training
03

In context

Frailty

1,284 studies on the registry are indexed under Frailty; 452 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 81 across 767 interventional studies indexed under Frailty.

Browse Frailty studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University is the lead sponsor of 257 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older who are classified as at least "vulnerable" using the Clinical Frailty Scale (score ≥4).
  • Participants must have no cognitive impairment and be able to follow commands, as assessed by the (MMSE).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) are unable to participate in exercise (e.g., due to severe musculoskeletal disorders)
  • (2) have high-risk factors for exercise, such as uncontrolled hypertension (>150 mmHg systolic blood pressure (SBP) / >90 mmHg diastolic blood pressure (DBP), coagulation disorders, and deep venous thrombosis
  • (3) have hematological disorders or are using hematology related-medications
  • (4) have significant comorbidities, including a history of stroke, diabetes with severe complications, or cardiovascular diseases
  • (5) chronic lung conditions (e.g., obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma), and
  • (6) have participated in a structured exercise training program within the past 3 months at a frequency exceeding three sessions per week.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Participants in the experimental group will receive a 6 week combined BFR and IMT intervention

    Behavioral: Exercise

  • Sham comparator
    Control group

    Participants in the control group will receive a 6-week combined combined BFR and sham IMT intervention.

    Behavioral: Sham Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralExercise

    Each session will last approximately 60 minutes and will include three components: (1) an initial 3-minute IMT exercise performed at an intensity corresponding to rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 11-13 on the Borg 6-20 scale, (2) a 50-minute low-intensity exercise program combined with BFR, and (3) a second 3-minute IMT session at the same target intensity. For the IMT, the protocol follows a progressive intensity model, starting with 30% of the maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) in Week 1 to allow participants to become familiar with the technique. The intensity will gradually increase to a target of 60% MIP by Week 6, based on the participants' tolerance. For the BFR, during weeks 1-2, participants will train at constant loads. From weeks 2-6, training loads will be increased. Cuff pressure will be prescribed relative to the calculated arterial occlusion pressure (AOP): 50% in weeks 1-2, 60% in weeks 3-4, and 70% in weeks 5-6 for both lower- and upper-body exercises.

  • BehavioralSham Control

    Participants in the control group will perform the identical BFR exercise protocol as the intervention group. However, IMT will be delivered at 2% of MIP, which is considered a sham condition and has not been shown to improve respiratory muscle function. If the calculated load corresponding to 2% of a participant's baseline S-Index is below the minimum resistance permitted by the POWERbreathe K5, the device's minimum available load of 5 cmH₂O will be applied.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment rate

    The recruitment rate will be calculated by dividing the number of recruited participants by the number of eligible participants

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  2. Attrition rate

    Attrition rate is the proportion of randomized participants who withdraw from the study or are lost to follow-up before completing the final assessment.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  3. Exercise Enjoyment

    Enjoyment will be assessed using a single-item Exercise Enjoyment Scale, which asks participants, "How much did you enjoy the exercise session?). Responses are rated on a 7 Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (extremely)

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  4. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    The SPPB consists of three components-standing balance, gait speed, and repeated chair stands-each scored from 0 to 4 and summed to a total score ranging from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). Lower SPPB scores indicate poorer physical function and a higher risk of adverse outcomes, with scores below 10 predictive of all-cause mortality in older adults.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  5. 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    The 6MWT will be used to assess functional exercise capacity. Participants will be instructed to walk as far as possible along a flat, straight course for 6 minutes, and the total distance is recorded.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  6. Time Up to Go (TUG)

    The TUG test is used to assess functional mobility, balance, and fall risk in older adults, incorporating a series of dynamic activities. Participants will be instructed to rise from a chair, walk three meters at a comfortable pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The total time taken to complete the task is recorded, with longer times indicating poorer functional mobility and higher fall risk

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Respiratory Muscle Strength

    We will use the S-Index Test to evaluate the respiratory muscle function based on maximum dynamic inspiratory pressure, which is a recommended tool developed by POWERbreathe. Participants will be advised to avoid strenuous exercise for 24h and to rest in a sitting position for 15 minutes before the assessment. Then, they performed eight inspiratory maneuvers in a standing position, divided into three to four series of two to three repetitions.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  2. Handgrip Strength

    Handgrip strength will be evaluated to estimate the maximum upper-limb muscle function in older adults. Participants will be seated with the shoulder adducted, the elbow flexed to 90°, and the forearm and wrist in a neutral position. They will then be instructed to squeeze the dynamometer as forcefully as possible.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  3. Five-times sit-to-stand

    The five-times sit-to-stand test is simple to administer and has been widely applied in both clinical and research settings. Participants will sit with their backs against the chair and be instructed to stand and sit five times as quickly as possible.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  4. Frailty level

    The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a 9-point global clinical measure ranging from 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill), used to classify frailty severity in older adults. A traditional Chinese version of the CFS has been validated in Taiwanese older adults, demonstrating acceptable inter-rater reliability and good criterion validity against established frailty measures

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  5. Fall Efficacy

    The short form of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) includes 7 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all concerned) to 4 (very concerned). The total score ranges from 7 to 28, with higher values indicating greater concern about falling

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  6. Adverse events

    The study team will record adverse events during the intervention caused by the exercise, including falls, fractures, exercise-related pain, dizziness, muscle strain, sprains, respiratory and cardiac adverse events, and hospitalization.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  7. Fat mass

    Fat mass will be assessed using a body composition analyzer and recorded in kilograms

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  8. Fat-free mass

    Fat-free mass will be assessed using a body composition analyzer and recorded in kilograms.

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

Other outcomes

  1. The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) Scale

    The Borg RPE scale reflects an individual's subjective perception of exercise intensity, integrating sensations of physical effort, breathlessness, and fatigue. The scale ranges from 6 to 20, where 6 indicates "no exertion at all" and 20 indicates "maximal exertion." This RPE score will be assessed every training session

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

  2. Automated Office Blood Pressure

    Automated Office Blood Pressure will be monitored before and after intervention to minimize cardiovascular risks and ensure that timely medical assistance is available for participants who experience any discomfort. Upon arrival at the lab, participants will be asked to sit for at least 5 minutes before the first blood pressure reading; the average of two readings will be used for that visit

    Time frame: T0 = baseline; T1 = immediately after intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 5, 2026
Sites
Taipei Medical University is now Recruiting
Oct 5, 2026
Start date
Jul 30, 2026→Aug 19, 2026 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Sponsor
Collaborators added: University of Texas at Austin; collaborators removed: The University of Texas at Austin
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Taipei Medical University is now Recruiting
    Start date Jul 30, 2026→Aug 19, 2026 (now actual)
    Sponsor Collaborators added: University of Texas at Austin; collaborators removed: The University of Texas at Austin
    + 2 other changes: oversight details and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07573995
Collaborators
National Taiwan University, University of Texas at Austin
Responsible party
Pei-Shan, Tsai (Professor, Taipei Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 7, 2026
Start date
Aug 19, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Pei-Shan Tsai Professor, PhD
Contact
ptsai@tmu.edu.tw
+886227361661 ext. 6321

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion