CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05512039RELIEFUpdated Feb 3, 2026

Reduced-dose Botox for Urgency Incontinence Among Elder Females

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Botox 50 Unit Injection and Botox 100 Unit Injection in Overactive Bladder, Urinary Incontinence in Old Age and Urgency Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 7 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-03.

Sponsored by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
376
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to study the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), specifically among women 70 years and older, by comparing reduced versus standard dose of onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX; trade name BOTOX(c)) injection in the bladder.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this quadruple-masked, randomized-controlled study is to study the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) specifically among older women with low- versus standard-dose of onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) via: symptom-specific and health-related quality of life (QOL; Aim 1), patient-reported and clinical outcome measures including adverse events (Aim 2), qualitative experience with focused interviews (Aim 3) and cost burden and economic impact (Aim 4). This study is an active collaboration between researchers in Gynecology, Urology, and Geriatrics at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) and at 6 other centers; University of Alabama (UAB), University of Pittsburgh (U Pitt), University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW), Kaiser Permanente of Southern California (KPSCP), Oregon Health \& Sciences University (OHSU), and University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC; joined January 2025). The investigators also have collaborators at Stanford University and University of Connecticut, though those sites are not recruiting participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder
  • Urinary Incontinence in Old Age
  • Urgency Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Urgency Urinary Incontinence
  • Overactive Bladder
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

855 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 376 is above the median of 72 across 652 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Overactive.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Overactive studies →

Lead sponsor

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 472 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult female at least 70 years old at date of enrollment
  2. Urgency urinary incontinence (urge incontinence > stress incontinence per screening criteria)
  3. On average 2 or more urgency or insensible incontinence episodes per day per patient report
  4. Refractory urinary urgency incontinence, defined as

    1. Persistent symptoms despite trial of one or more conservative treatments (e.g. behavioral therapy, physical therapy, home Kegel exercises); participants not required to have attempted first line therapies if deemed not feasible or appropriate by provider with input of participant/caregiver.
    2. Persistent symptoms despite the use of anticholinergic and/or beta-3 agonist medication; or inability to tolerate medication due to side effects, or has a contraindication to taking medication, or is unable to afford the cost of the medication.
  5. Currently not on an anticholinergic or beta-3 agonist medication or is willing to stop medication for 3 weeks prior to completing baseline bladder tally, with plan to remain off medication through duration of the study. Currently not actively using sacral neuromodulation therapy (either has not tried, or unit has been off for 4 weeks prior to baseline bladder tally and will remain turned off for the duration of the study). It is permissible for participants to continue self-led conservative therapies during participation in the study, including Kegel exercises, avoidance of bladder irritants, and urge suppression.
  6. Willing and able to complete all study-related items, with assistance of caregiver(s) if needed.
  7. Demonstrates awareness of possible need for catheterization in event of post-injection urinary retention \& acknowledges risks of catheterization. Participant does not need to demonstrate ability to perform self-catheterization.
  8. Grossly neurologically normal on exam and no gross systemic neurologic conditions believed to affect urinary function. Patients with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease or diabetes may be eligible provided they have a grossly normal neurologic exam and otherwise fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lack of capacity to provide consent. Will be assessed if needed per judgment of the site PI and study staff, with use of optional questionnaire.
  2. Baseline persistently elevated post-void residual [PVR] (>150mL on 2 occasions in the 6 weeks prior to enrollment). If the PVR was obtained via bladder scanner with measurements differing by more than 100mL, or if there is concern about the accuracy of the scanner, it will be confirmed via catheterization which will be considered the gold standard.
  3. Need for BTX injection to take place in the Operating Room or under sedation. (Of note, for repeat injection under the protocol, patients may have OR injection if indicated due to pain with initial BTX injection.)
  4. Previous treatment with intravesical BTX in the last 12 months or use of sacral neuromodulation therapy within the past 4 weeks (unit may remain implanted, but should remain off for duration of the study).
  5. Untreated symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI). Eligible once UTI treatment complete and symptoms resolved.
  6. Known bladder abnormality, including current or prior bladder malignancy, carcinoma in situ or untreatable cystitis (e.g. eosinophilic cystitis); prior major bladder surgery that would alter the detrusor muscle, such as augmentation cystoplasty; or hematuria that has not been evaluated.
  7. Neurogenic detrusor overactivity or neurologic disease that may impact bladder function, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy, spinal cord injury. Conditions such as Parkinson's disease and diabetes are acceptable provided normal bladder emptying and grossly normal neurologic function.
  8. Concurrent BTX use for other indication, participants cannot exceed 300 units BTX in a 3 month period. Participants who may have conflict between study BTX administration and administration for other purposes may be excluded from participation if there is concern that study drug administration will be compromised. Concurrent use of BTX for another indication that would not exceed 300 units in a 3 month period, or that can have time of administration of the other BTX adjusted to avoid excessive dose, is acceptable; for instance, for migraines.
  9. Greater than stage 2 pelvic floor prolapse, uncorrected or persistent despite pessary use (leading edge of prolapse not greater than 1cm beyond the hymen). Ongoing pessary use is permissible. Patients may have had a prior repair for pelvic organ prolapse. (see chart review of recent exam or perform brief exam while collecting post-void residual)
  10. Planned prolapse or stress incontinence surgery; would defer enrollment to >3 months post-operative.
  11. Allergy or intolerance to lidocaine or BTX.
  12. Participation in another research study that could conflict with the RELIEF study, in estimation of the site PI.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
376 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Botox: Standard dose

    The standard dose of 100 units of botox will be injected into the bladder.

    Drug: Botox 100 Unit Injection

  • Experimental
    Botox: Low dose

    A lower dose of 50 units of botox will be injected into the bladder.

    Drug: Botox 50 Unit Injection

Interventions

  • DrugBotox 50 Unit Injection

    Participants will be randomized to either receive a standard dose (100 units) or reduced dose (50 units) of onabotulinumtoxinA. If a participant has decreased symptom relief they may receive repeat treatment up to twice during the 12 month follow-up period, with minimum 4 month intervals between treatments.

    Also known as: OnabotulinumtoxinA 50 Unit Injection

  • DrugBotox 100 Unit Injection

    Participants will be randomized to either receive a standard dose (100 units) or reduced dose (50 units) of onabotulinumtoxinA. If a participant has decreased symptom relief they may receive repeat injection up to twice during the 12 month follow-up period, with minimum 4 month intervals between treatments.

    Also known as: OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 Unit

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in symptom specific quality of life and bother over time.

    The Overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq-SF), is a validated and reliable patient-centered quality of life questionnaire. The OABq-SF is based on a continuous sore of 0-100, with higher score translating to greater bother.

    Time frame: Baseline, monthly post-injection through 12 months post-injection; primary outcome is at 3 months post-injection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Symptom severity

    Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6). The UDI-6 has a cut off score of 33.33 to distinguish women who are symptomatic versus asymptomatic. UDI-6 scores that are greater than 33.33 indicated higher distress caused by urinary incontinence symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, & 12 months post injection. Results will be compared at the end of the 12 months.

  2. Symptom bother

    Incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ). The IIQ has a cut off score of 9.52. This score distinguish women who are symptomatic and asymptomatic.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, & 12 months post injection. Results will be compared at the end of the 12 months.

  3. Change in number of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes per day.

    Participants will keep a bladder tally for 3 days and results will be compared from baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months post injected to determine if there has been a change in the number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes.

    Time frame: Baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months post injection

  4. Change in Global Symptom Improvement

    Participants will be asked to complete the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. The PGI-I scale is a one item assessment with responses ranging from "very much better" to "very much worse".

    Time frame: Baseline,3, 6, & 12 months post injection

  5. Goal setting and attainment

    Participants will express 3-5 goals and goal attainment will be assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Survey (PGI-I Scale). The PGI-I scale is a one item assessment with responses ranging from "very much better" to "very much worse".

    Time frame: Baseline & 3 months post injection.

  6. Change in general health-related quality of life as measure by the Health Utility Index-3

    Participants will complete the Health Utilities Index (HUI). The HUI measure health status, reporting health-related quality of life, and producing utility scores. The score ranges from 0.00 (dead) to 1.00 (perfect health).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 6 and 12 months

  7. Depression

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 10 item scale with scores ranging from 1(minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months post injection. Results will be compared at the end of the 3 month post injection.

  8. Procedural discomfort and adverse events

    Urinary retention, post-void residual \& duration of voiding dysfunction; urinary tract infection, unscheduled clinic/emergency department visits and any adverse events assessed using the Clavien-Dindo scale,which has been validated for use in urology setting.

    Time frame: Day of injection and monthly through 12 months

  9. Qualitative experience of BTX treatment and adverse events

    Using novel focused interview for a subset of participants. Participants will be interviewed before injection and 3 months post injection.

    Time frame: Baseline & 3 months post injection

  10. Survey of economic burden

    Incontinence Resource Use Questionnaire measures the amount of use of various incontinence products. Questions include the number of incontinence protection items used per week.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 & 12 months. Results will be compared at the end of the 12 months.

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • University of Alabama - Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Medical Group
    San Diego, California 92110, United States
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03766, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Amundsen CL, Komesu YM, Chermansky C, Gregory WT, Myers DL, Honeycutt EF, Vasavada SP, Nguyen JN, Wilson TS, Harvie HS, Wallace D; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Two-Year Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Trial. Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 24. PubMed 29482936 ↗
  • Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, Vasavada SP; American Urological Association; Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1572-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.087. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PubMed 25623739 ↗
  • Drake MJ, Nitti VW, Ginsberg DA, Brucker BM, Hepp Z, McCool R, Glanville JM, Fleetwood K, James D, Chapple CR. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):611-622. doi: 10.1111/bju.13945. Epub 2017 Aug 2. PubMed 28670786 ↗
  • Coyne KS, Payne C, Bhattacharyya SK, Revicki DA, Thompson C, Corey R, Hunt TL. The impact of urinary urgency and frequency on health-related quality of life in overactive bladder: results from a national community survey. Value Health. 2004 Jul-Aug;7(4):455-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.74008.x. PubMed 15449637 ↗
  • Monz B, Pons ME, Hampel C, Hunskaar S, Quail D, Samsioe G, Sykes D, Wagg A, Papanicolaou S. Patient-reported impact of urinary incontinence--results from treatment seeking women in 14 European countries. Maturitas. 2005 Nov 30;52 Suppl 2:S24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Nov 16. PubMed 16297579 ↗
  • Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):375-84. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002092. PubMed 11491197 ↗
  • Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Oct 16;1:54. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-54. PubMed 14613568 ↗
  • Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379. PubMed 12861145 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Yes, per PCORI data sharing policy. Details TBD.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05512039
Lead sponsor
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Dartmouth College, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Pittsburgh, University of Texas, Kaiser Permanente, Oregon Health and Science University, Stanford University, University of Connecticut, University of Nebraska
Responsible party
Anne C. Cooper, MD MA (Principal Investigator, Assistant Professor, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 23, 2022
Start date
May 12, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 3, 2026

Study contacts

Anne C Cooper, MD, MA
principal investigator · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
E A Gormley, MD
principal investigator · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion