ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05509218(A-FRAME)Updated Jun 16, 2026Results posted

Alcohol Feedback, Reflection and Morning Evaluation

An interventional study of Mobile-delivered personalized feedback in Youth Drinking and Alcohol Drinking, sponsored by Brown University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 29 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by Brown University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
152
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 29 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose to examine mornings after drinking as an optimal time to provide repeated, personalized feedback, with the goal of reducing hazardous drinking. Specifically, the investigators will further develop and pilot test a novel theory-based personalized feedback intervention (PFI) for heavy drinking young adults. Intervention strategies include personalized feedback (e.g., feedback on prior night blood alcohol concentration, consequences) contrasted with both drinking goals set at baseline and corrective normative feedback (e.g., how last night's drinking compares to peers). Up to 170 participants (50% non-college) will be randomized to one of three groups: PFI with monetary incentives for daily surveys, PFI without monetary incentives, or survey assessment only. The investigators will examine recruitment rates, retention rates, confirmation of intervention content delivery/intake, response rates to daily surveys, data quality, and ratings of intervention value. Investigators will test whether these indicators of engagement differ between those who do and do not receive monetary incentives for daily surveys. Further, baseline, post-test, and 3-month follow-up assessments will allow us to examine differences in drinking behavior between PFI and control. The results of the proposed research will result in a novel and scalable intervention for alcohol misuse among young adults, with potential to have an important impact on the public health problem of high-risk drinking.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will recruit up to 170 participants for a small randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized to four weeks of intervention with or without daily incentives for completing surveys, or assessment-only control, to test feasibility, acceptability, and initial evidence of efficacy.

  1. Baseline assessment and orientation. An orientation meeting will be used to describe all study procedures and obtain informed consent. If informed consent is obtained, participants will then be given one week to complete a baseline survey (\~30 minutes) on their own time, using their own computers. Data needed to personalize the intervention content will be collected during the baseline survey. Participants will be asked to choose from a range of possible goal types (e.g., max drinks per drinking event, drinks per week, weekly frequency of drinking, "skip goals", "delay goals", slow goals", "stop goals"). These goals an be integrated/contrasted with subsequent self-reported behavior on morning reports during the intervention period. After the baseline survey, a research assistant (RA) will review study procedures.
  2. Randomization. Randomization will occur following consent. The pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) will include three conditions (mobile PFI with daily incentive for surveys, mobile PFI without daily incentives, assessment-only). PFI participants (both groups) will also complete (1) orientation and participant training (as described above), (2) four weeks of daily assessment and (3) intervention (as described below), and (4) follow-up surveys.
  3. Daily assessment. Daily assessment + feedback will begin on a Monday for all participants. A link to a web-based morning survey will be sent at 7am, and it will remain available until 2pm. When prior night alcohol use is endorsed, details will be assessed via single item measures about the drinking event.
  4. Personalized Feedback Reports. Following each daily survey on which a participant (in PFI groups) indicates prior day drinking, personalized feedback will be provided on how their most recent behavior (e.g., drinks last night, drinking days so far this week) compare/contrast with personal goals. Participants will then choose whether to receive additional feedback in any of 7 areas: blood alcohol concentration, high risk behaviors, consequences of drinking, caloric intake, spending, how drinking compares to peers, and safe drinking strategies. In addition to day-level feedback, an aggregate feedback report on drinking patterns and related behaviors will be delivered twice, once at the end of each 2-week period. At the end of the 2-week feedback report, participants in the intervention groups will have the opportunity to update/add goals for the next 2 weeks, given what they learned thus far about their personalized behavior-outcome links.
  5. Follow-up surveys. At the end of four weeks, participants in all three groups will complete a 30-minute online survey (post-intervention). The final 30-minute follow-up will take place three months after the end of intervention (four months after baseline) and will assess primary outcomes and mechanisms.
02

Conditions studied

  • Youth Drinking
  • Alcohol Drinking

Keywords

  • young adults
  • personalized feedback intervention
  • mobile intervention
  • alcohol use
03

In context

Underage Drinking

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Underage Drinking; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 152 is below the median of 360 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Underage Drinking.

Browse Underage Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

Brown University is the lead sponsor of 290 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 29 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-29 years
  • Own a smartphone and use it daily
  • Heavy episodic drinking (4+/5+ drinks for women/men) at least weekly in past month
  • At least one of 10 negative consequences assessed
  • at least somewhat willing to consider drinking even a little less than current

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current participation in treatment for an alcohol or other substance use disorder
  • participation in an earlier phase of the study
  • enrollment in ongoing alcohol studies at the same university
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
152 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Personalized feedback plus incentive

    Following each daily survey on which a participant indicates prior day drinking, personalized feedback will be provided. Participants in this group will receive $1 per day for submitting their daily survey.

    Behavioral: Mobile-delivered personalized feedback

  • Experimental
    Personalized feedback without incentive

    Following each daily survey on which a participant indicates prior day drinking, personalized feedback will be provided. Participants in this group will NOT receive $1 per day for submitting their daily survey.

    Behavioral: Mobile-delivered personalized feedback

  • No intervention
    Control

    Participants in this arm will only complete baseline and follow-up surveys.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMobile-delivered personalized feedback

    Following each daily survey on which a participant indicates prior day drinking, personalized feedback will be provided on how their most recent behavior (e.g., drinks last night, drinking days so far this week) compare/contrast with personal goals. Participants will then choose whether to receive additional feedback in any of 7 areas: blood alcohol concentrate on, high risk behaviors, consequences of drinking, caloric intake, spending, how drinking compares to peers, and safe drinking strategies. All participants will receive feedback on drinks consumed, and then be asked to choose at least one additional topic for feedback (following each drinking day). In addition to day-level feedback, an aggregate feedback report on drinking patterns and related behaviors will be delivered twice, once at the end of each 2-week period. Once again, they will have the option to view feedback across the range of topics noted above.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Drinks Per Week Post-test

    drinks per week in the past 30 days

    Time frame: post-test (1 month following baseline; end of intervention period for those in intervention groups)

  2. Heavy Drinking Frequency Post-test

    Number of days drinking 4+ drinks (women) or 5+ drinks (men) in the past 30 days

    Time frame: post-test (end of 4-week intervention for those in intervention groups, and 1 month after baseline)

  3. Negative Alcohol Consequences Post-test

    Number of consequences reported on the 24-item Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ)

    Time frame: post-test (end of 4-week intervention)

  4. Drinks Per Week 3-month Follow-up

    drinks per week in the past 30 days

    Time frame: 3 month follow-up (4 months following baseline)

  5. Heavy Drinking Frequency 3-month Follow-up

    Number of days drinking 4+ drinks (women) or 5+ drinks (men) in the past 30 days

    Time frame: 3 month follow-up (4 months post-baseline)

  6. Negative Alcohol Consequences 3-month Follow-up

    Number of consequences reported on the 24-item Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ)

    Time frame: 3-month follow-up (3 months after end of intervention; 4 months after baseline

07

Results

Posted Jun 16, 2026

Participant flow

Participants were recruited via social media advertisements, outreach to participants from prior studies with documented interest in future studies, and a university listserv. Recruitment occurred between August 2024 and June 2025.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePersonalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControl
Started545246
Completed544946
Not completed030
Withdrew: 3 withdrawn from no incentives group due to ineligibility becoming clear after enrollment030

Outcome measures

PrimaryDrinks Per Week Post-test

drinks per week in the past 30 days

Time frame:
post-test (1 month following baseline; end of intervention period for those in intervention groups)
Reported as:
Mean · drinks per week
Drinks Per Week Post-test
drinks per weekPersonalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControl
Drinks Per Week Post-test15.28 ± 12.0112.76 ± 10.6611.48 ± 7.93
Statistical analysis
  • Personalized Feedback Plus Incentive vs Personalized Feedback Without Incentive vs Control · ANCOVA · p = .452 · F-test from ancova: 0.569
PrimaryHeavy Drinking Frequency Post-test

Number of days drinking 4+ drinks (women) or 5+ drinks (men) in the past 30 days

Time frame:
post-test (end of 4-week intervention for those in intervention groups, and 1 month after baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · number of heavy drinking days
Heavy Drinking Frequency Post-test
number of heavy drinking daysPersonalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControl
Heavy Drinking Frequency Post-test5.75 ± 5.804.91 ± 4.804.16 ± 4.57
Statistical analysis
  • Personalized Feedback Plus Incentive vs Personalized Feedback Without Incentive vs Control · ANCOVA · p = .218 · F-test: 1.529
PrimaryNegative Alcohol Consequences Post-test

Number of consequences reported on the 24-item Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ)

Time frame:
post-test (end of 4-week intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · negative consequences
Negative Alcohol Consequences Post-test
negative consequencesPersonalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControl
Negative Alcohol Consequences Post-test6.28 ± 4.466.82 ± 4.726.11 ± 4.55
Statistical analysis
  • Personalized Feedback Plus Incentive vs Personalized Feedback Without Incentive vs Control · ANCOVA · p = .214 · F-test: 1.558
PrimaryDrinks Per Week 3-month Follow-up

drinks per week in the past 30 days

Time frame:
3 month follow-up (4 months following baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · drinks per week
Drinks Per Week 3-month Follow-up
drinks per weekPersonalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControl
Drinks Per Week 3-month Follow-up11.20 ± 9.629.85 ± 9.1510.18 ± 7.51
Statistical analysis
  • Personalized Feedback Plus Incentive vs Personalized Feedback Without Incentive vs Control · ANCOVA · p = .556 · F-test: 0.349
PrimaryHeavy Drinking Frequency 3-month Follow-up

Number of days drinking 4+ drinks (women) or 5+ drinks (men) in the past 30 days

Time frame:
3 month follow-up (4 months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · number of heavy drinking days
Heavy Drinking Frequency 3-month Follow-up
number of heavy drinking daysPersonalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControl
Heavy Drinking Frequency 3-month Follow-up3.78 ± 4.263.80 ± 4.114.02 ± 4.00
Statistical analysis
  • Personalized Feedback Plus Incentive vs Personalized Feedback Without Incentive vs Control · ANCOVA · p = .498 · F-test: 0.461
PrimaryNegative Alcohol Consequences 3-month Follow-up

Number of consequences reported on the 24-item Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ)

Time frame:
3-month follow-up (3 months after end of intervention; 4 months after baseline
Reported as:
Mean · negative consequences
Negative Alcohol Consequences 3-month Follow-up
negative consequencesPersonalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControl
Negative Alcohol Consequences 3-month Follow-up6.49 ± 5.424.91 ± 4.475.33 ± 4.65
Statistical analysis
  • Personalized Feedback Plus Incentive vs Personalized Feedback Without Incentive vs Control · ANCOVA · p = .859 · F-test: .032

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment to end of follow-up (4 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Personalized Feedback Plus Incentive0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)
Personalized Feedback Without Incentive0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)
Control0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Personalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControlTotal
Mean23.28 ± 2.9223.86 ± 3.2923.22 ± 2.7223.45 ± 2.98
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Personalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControlTotal
Female32291980
Male22202769
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Personalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian127827
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American42410
White32343096
More than one race45413
Unknown or Not Reported2103
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Personalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino48719
Not Hispanic or Latino504139130
Unknown or Not Reported0000
drinks per week
drinks per week(drinks per week)Personalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControlTotal
Mean18.47 ± 13.6717.22 ± 11.1315.24 ± 10.0617.06 ± 11.82
heavy drinking frequency
heavy drinking frequency(days)Personalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControlTotal
Mean6.96 ± 5.927.06 ± 4.056.30 ± 4.866.79 ± 5.02
negative consequences
negative consequences(consequences)Personalized Feedback Plus IncentivePersonalized Feedback Without IncentiveControlTotal
Mean8.52 ± 3.899.67 ± 4.907.33 ± 3.688.53 ± 4.27
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Brown University
    Providence, Rhode Island 02903, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — This study will submit and share data with NIAAA Data Archive, a data repository housed within the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA). Participants complete a baseline survey of participant characteristics and drinking behavior and related constructs, a post-test survey, and a 3-month follow-up assessment to measure drinking behavior post-intervention. Data from these 3 surveys will be shared.

Time frame: Data will be shared on or before the NDA submission due dates (April 1 and October 1 each year). It will remain in the archive as per the archive regulations.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2024 to primary completion in Oct 2025, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2026, 7 months after primary completion.

Of 34 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Underage Drinking, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 38. This study's 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 36 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2022
First posted
Aug 22, 2022
StartActual
Aug 26, 2024
Primary completionActual
Oct 28, 2025
CompletionActual
Oct 28, 2025
Results first posted
Jun 16, 2026
Last update
Jun 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05509218
Lead sponsor
Brown University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2022
Start date
Aug 26, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 28, 2025
Completion
Oct 28, 2025
Results posted
Jun 16, 2026
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Study contacts

Jennifer E Merrill, PhD
principal investigator · Brown University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion