ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05500391SUR-CANUpdated Mar 18, 2026

Assessment of Compliance With Monitoring Conducted by a Physician in Person or by a Nurse in Remote Monitoring

A Phase 2 interventional study of Oncological Follow-up in Stage I Testicular Seminoma, Stage I Testicular Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, sponsored by Centre Oscar Lambret. Recruiting at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-18.

Sponsored by Centre Oscar Lambret · Phase 2, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2024; still recruiting 2 years 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, interventional, randomized study among adult patients recently diagnosed with a rare tumor (\<12 months). The study will aim to compare compliance with the personalized post-treatment surveillance plan, established for each patient according to national guidelines, when the surveillance is conducted in person by a hospital-based physician (control arm) or remotely by a trained nurse (experimental arm).

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to compare 2-year compliance with the personalized post-treatment surveillance plan between the two arms.

The secondary objectives are to compare between the two arms :

  • Long-term compliance (5-year follow-up)
  • Use of care
  • Oncological events and their management
  • Supportive care needs

The exploratory objectives are to :

  • Evaluate the costs in terms of medical transportation
  • Evaluate and compare patients' satisfaction and psychological well-being (in terms of anxiety/depression)
  • Evaluate the homogeneity of the impact of the intervention according to covariates (gender, tumor pathology, occupational status, and center)
  • Evaluate the reasons for recruitment failures
02

Conditions studied

  • Stage I Testicular Seminoma
  • Stage I Testicular Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor
  • Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
  • Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor
  • Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell
  • Borderline Ovarian Tumor
  • Sex Cord-Stromal Tumor
  • Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Ovary
  • Carcinoma, Small Cell
  • Carcinosarcoma, Ovarian
  • Serous Tumor of Ovary
  • Glioma
  • Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Aggressive Fibromatosis of Abdominal Wall (Disorder)
03

In context

Seminoma

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Seminoma; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 88 is above the median of 50 across 47 interventional studies indexed under Seminoma.

Browse Seminoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Oscar Lambret is the lead sponsor of 130 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Positive diagnosis (anatomopathology) of tumor within 12 months
  • Patient 18 years of age or older
  • Patient with one of the following conditions:

    1. Desmoid fibromatosis of the abdominal wall operated on or under active surveillance
    2. Stage I testicular seminoma (whether or not treated with carboplatin AUC7)
    3. Stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (with or without BEP chemotherapy)
    4. Operated GIST with low risk of relapse
    5. Rare gynecological tumors (sex cord and stromal tumors; germ cell tumors of the ovary, clear cell adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary, borderline tumors, small cell carcinoma, ovarian and uterine carcinosarcoma, low grade serous tumors), operated
    6. Low-grade glioma, operated
    7. Low-grade neuroendocrine tumor, treated by surgery alone
  • Patient who has given consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to imaging tests required for the surveillance plan
  • No telephone
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Telesurveillance by a nurse

    Other: Oncological Follow-up

  • Other
    Control

    On-site surveillance by a hospital physician

    Other: Oncological Follow-up

Interventions

  • OtherOncological Follow-up

    Post-cancer surveillance (including biological, clinical and imaging exams depending on the condition)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year compliance to the customized surveillance plan

    Compliance is defined by completion of all scheduled examinations (telephone contact, biological, clinical examination and imaging examination) with a margin of + or - 30 days from the scheduled date

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. 5-year compliance to the customized surveillance plan

    Compliance is defined by completion of all scheduled examinations (telephone contact, biological, clinical examination and imaging examination) with a margin of + or - 30 days from the scheduled date

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Drop-out rate

    Rate of patients lost to follow-up or quitting the surveillance program

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Description of the use of care

    * number of physical consultations at the investigator site * number of emergency room visits for oncological reasons * number of extra-hospital consultations for oncological reasons

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Occurrence and management of oncological events

    Occurence and type of oncological event : relapse/progression. The management of oncological events will be evaluated according to three criteria : * completion of an oncological surgery * implementation of a treatment by radiotherapy * implementation of a systemic therapy such as chemotherapy

    Time frame: 5 years

  5. Progression-free survival

    Time from randomization to first oncological event (progression/relapse) or death from any cause.

    Time frame: 5 years

  6. Overall survival

    Time from randomization to death from any cause

    Time frame: 5 years

  7. Support care needs identified

    Support care needs include : * algology consultation * nutrition/diet consultation * psycho-oncology consultation * social worker consultation * job retention consultation

    Time frame: 2 years (early termination in case of relapse of the disease)

Other outcomes

  1. Costs in terms of medical transport use

    Medical transport includes light medical vehicles and ambulances

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Salary mass mobilized from a hospital perspective in both arms

    Salary mass mobilized from a hospital perspective in both arms

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Patient satisfaction

    Patients will answer a satisfaction survey (French Version of the Princess Margaret Hospital Satisfaction With Doctor) at different points of the study depending on their pathology

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Patient reported outcomes

    Patient reported outcomes will be evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire at different points of the study depending on their pathology. The questionnaire consists of a list of questions to determine the level of anxiety and depression experienced by the patients. Each question is scored from 0-3 and this means that a person can score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression: A score equal to or less than 7 indicates no symptoms, A score of 8 - 10 indicates a questionable symptoms, A score of 11 and above confirms of the presence of anxiety and/or depression symptoms.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Evaluation of the causes of recruitment failures

    In each investigating site, a screening log will be completed to find out the reasons for recruitment failures

    Time frame: During the recruiting period (18 months)

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kimman ML, Bloebaum MM, Dirksen CD, Houben RM, Lambin P, Boersma LJ. Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow-up after curative treatment for breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010 Apr 30;10:174. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-174. PubMed 20429948 ↗
  • Moloney J, Partridge C, Delanty S, Lloyd D, Nguyen MH. High efficacy and patient satisfaction with a nurse-led colorectal cancer surveillance programme with 10-year follow-up. ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1286-1290. doi: 10.1111/ans.15333. Epub 2019 Jul 7. PubMed 31280494 ↗
  • Martin E, Persaud S, Corr J, Casey R, Pillai R. Nurse-led active surveillance for prostate cancer is safe, effective and associated with high rates of patient satisfaction-results of an audit in the East of England. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Jul 25;12:854. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.854. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30093916 ↗
  • Keshava HB, Tan KS, Dycoco J, Huang J, Berkowitz A, Sumner D, Devigne A, Adusumilli P, Bains M, Bott M, Isbell J, Downey R, Molena D, Park B, Rocco G, Sihag S, Jones DR, Rusch VW. Long-term assessment of efficacy with a novel Thoracic Survivorship Program for patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May;163(5):1645-1653.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.026. Epub 2021 Nov 20. PubMed 34922758 ↗
  • Ferrua M, Minvielle E, Fourcade A, Lalloue B, Sicotte C, Di Palma M, Mir O. How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 19;20(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05293-4. PubMed 32429987 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 32 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 10, 2022
First posted
Aug 15, 2022
StartActual
Feb 28, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 2032
Last update
Mar 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05500391
Collaborators
Canceropôle Nord Ouest, Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 15, 2022
Start date
Feb 28, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 18, 2026

Study contacts

Laurence ROTSAERT
Contact
l-rotsaert@o-lambret.fr
0320295860 / 0320295918
Fanny BEN OUNE
Contact
f-benoune@o-lambret.fr
0320295918 ext. +33
PENEL Nicolas, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Centre Oscar Lambret

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion