An interventional study of primary RPLND for low-stage metasatatic seminoma and 3 courses of chemotherapy; Blemocin, Etoposide and Platinum (BEP) in Testicular Cancer, Seminoma and Quality of Life, sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.
Sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this prospective observational study is to learn about the short- and long-term effects of treating men over the age of 18 with good prognosis metastatic testicular cancer with either primary retropertioneal lymph node dissection, RPLND, (for low-stage metastastic seminoma) or three doses of chemotherapy for metastastic seminoma or nonseminoma. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does primary RPLND lower the risk of side-effects compared to receiving chemotherapy?
The current SWENOTECA guidelines from 2020 state that patients with seminoma stage IIA-IIB with \<3 lymph nodes \<30 mm in any dimension should be recommended a primary RPLND rather than the previously considered standard treatment, chemotherapy. The rationale behind this change is to reduce the number of patients at risk of acute and long-term side effects from chemotherapy. We aim to perform a quality-of-life assessment to determine whether the change from chemotherapy to surgery is justified regarding short- and long-term (2 years) quality-of-life.
Two study groups are formed:
Patients will be recrutied at eight study centers in Sweden and Norway. Since RPLND is centralized in Sweden and Norway, the study will be population-based.
Primary outcome is:
Changes across study-groups in global HRQOL after treatment as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 with the testicular cancer-specific supplement EORTC QLQ-TC26.
Secondary outcomes are:
Data will be assessed at baseline, at 3 months after start of treatment, at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.
295 studies on the registry are indexed under Testicular Neoplasms; 51 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 50 across 190 interventional studies indexed under Testicular Neoplasms.
Browse Testicular Neoplasms studies →Sahlgrenska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 263 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Adjuvant and neoadjuvant
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Undergoing primary RPLND
Procedure: primary RPLND for low-stage metasatatic seminoma
Receiving chemotherapy
Drug: 3 courses of chemotherapy; Blemocin, Etoposide and Platinum (BEP)
surgical lymph node dissection
systemic tretament for good prognosis metastastic testicular cancer
Also known as: Systemic chemotherapy, Bleomycin, Etoposide, Platinum
HRQOL after treatment as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 with the testicular cancer-specific supplement EORTC QLQ-TC26
Changes across study-groups in global HRQOL after treatment as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 with the testicular cancer-specific supplement EORTC QLQ-TC26 The QLQ-C30 comprises both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time frame: 2 years
Fatigue after RPLND vs. chemotherapy
Differences in fatigue across study-groups as measured by the Fatigue Questionnaire (FQ). The FQ is an established, self-report fatigue questionnaire comprising 14 items that assess the intensity of fatigue-related symptoms. Each item was rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 'better than usual', 1 'no more than usual', 2 'worse than usual', 3 'much worse than usual'). The FQ score is the sum of all items' scores (range 0-42).
Time frame: 2 years
Ejaculation problems
Differences across study-groups in patient-reported prevalence of retrograde ejaculation as assessed by two "supplementary" questions. These questions concern difficulties achieving ejaculation following sexual stimulation and whether the amount of semen is considered a problem. Answers are given on 4-point scales (no sexual stimulation has occurred, big difficulties (achieving ejaculation), small difficulties, no difficulties, and no sexual stimulation has occurred, large problem (amount of semen), small problem, no problem, respectively).
Time frame: 2 years
Treatment related complications
Rate of doctor-reported complications related to treatment in the study-groups. Journals are reviewed to gather information regarding the time and type of complication. Surgery group: Surgical complications are classified according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) system, a standardised, 5-grade system used to grade surgical complications based on the level of therapeutic intervention required to manage them. Chemotherapy group: Complications following chemotherapy are classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, using a 1-5 scale to grade the severity of the event.
Time frame: 2 years
Healt economy
Differences in quality-adjusted life years across study groups as measured by the EQ-5D-5L tool, consisting of an index varying from 1 (full health) to 0 (dead), with scores below 0 indicating states worse than being dead. The index is evaluated at baseline (before start of treatment) and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter.
Time frame: 2 years
PFS
Progression-free survival (PFS) are evaluated in both study groups. Medical records and national registers are used to identify recurrences of testicular cancer. Patients who do not have elevated markers or radiological evidence of disease recurrence or progression are considered free of recurrence or progression. The outcome will be dated and dicomotized (progression: yes/no).
Time frame: 10 years
Plan to share: Yes — all IPD that underlie results in a publication
Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report
Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results
Access criteria: Other researchers interested in a collaboration can contact SWENOTECA via PI Anna Grenabo Bergdahl (anna.grenabo@vgregion.se) or head of SWENOTECA Torgrim Tandstad (torgrimtandstad@gmail.com). A data sharing agreement must be signed, and documents can be submitted via e-mail to the above-mentioned contacts.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital →