ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05496491Updated Aug 26, 2026

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Rectal Neoplasms, sponsored by Larissa University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-26.

Sponsored by Larissa University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this protocol is to compare neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus consolidation chemotherapy before surgical resection with the standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is estimated that 10% of cancer mortality is attributed to malignant neoplasms of the colon and rectum. More specifically, in the United States alone, 53,200 colorectal cancer deaths were reported.

The current treatment of choice for locally advanced rectal cancer (Stage II/ III) is the combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical surgical resection based on the principles of total mesorectal excision (TME) after a 8-12 weeks period. Therapy is usually completed with the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy based on oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines. This combined approach allowed the reduction of local recurrence at levels around 5%. Despite the impressive results in local control, the same was not confirmed for the long-term, overall survival. Possible explanations to that are: a) the compliance and completion of the treatment schemes during the postoperative period were low and b) there was a delay in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy; both could lead to subclinical metastatic disease progression.

On the basis of achieving both goals, (i.e., local control through neoadjuvant radiotherapy and metastatic disease control through systemic chemotherapy) the administration of the two therapies in the preoperative period was proposed, in the form of combined or total neoadjuvant therapy.

Additional theoretical benefits of total neoadjuvant therapy is faster defunctioning stoma reversal, as well as, the possibility of a more accurate evaluation of the tumor biological behavior, thus enabling a safer staging for patients who would be candidates for a watch and wait protocol. Furthermore, for patients who will eventually undergo surgery, total neoadjuvant therapy could probably increase R0 resection and sphincter-preservation rates.

However, many researchers question the safety and efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy. First, the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increases the risk of severe toxicity from cytotoxic agents. At the same time, according to the results of one of the largest prospective randomized trials, the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy into the treatment algorithm did not offer any advantage in the pathological response, 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Finally, there is considerable heterogeneity in the current literature, most likely reflecting the different schemes used in different trials regarding the radiotherapy regimen, the chemotherapy regimen as well as the sequence of each one in each protocol.

The investigators believe that it is difficult to interpret any differences in results when multiple parameters have been changed in a comparative trial. For this reason when testing the current standard neoadjuvant protocol to the new trend of total neoadjuvant therapy it was decided to keep the same scheme and timing for the experimental group while the only parameter which was different was the use of the classic chemotherapy scheme during the waiting period following chemoradiation and before surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Neoplasms

Keywords

  • rectal
  • cancer
  • neoadjuvant
  • radiotherapy
  • chemotherapy
  • mesorectal
  • excision
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 65 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Larissa University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma
  • cT3, cT4, threatened CRM / MRF, EMVI (+), ≥N1
  • Multidisciplinary tumor board decision for treatment
  • Tumor distance from the anal verge \<15 cm based on endoscopy or magnetic resonance imaging
  • Patient 18 to 80 years old
  • General health condition status WHO 0-1
  • Absence of co-morbidities that may affect treatment
  • Neutrophils >1,500 / mm3, >100,000 / mm3, > 10 g / dL, normal creatinine, and > 50 mL / min
  • Signed of the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Distant
  • Non-resectable cancer
  • for the administration of chemotherapy
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • History of inflammatory bowel disorders
  • History of angina, acute myocardial infarction or heart failure
  • Active sepsis or systemic infection
  • Untreated physical and mental disability
  • Synchronous
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Lack of compliance with the protocol process
  • Non-granting of signed
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Consolidation Chemotherapy

    The experimental group will receive the standard 5-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Thereafter, all patients will commence consolidation chemotherapy. At the 6th week after the end of CRT, patients will undergo MRI re-staging: In case of non-response (mrTRG 5) they will be submitted immediately to surgery, and, subsequently, excluded from the trial. In case of response (mrTRG 2-4) they will receive consolidation chemotherapy for the whole waiting period between the end of CRT and surgery - 12 weeks.

    Radiation: Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy · Drug: Consolidation Chemotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy

    The control group will receive the standard 5-week neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen. Six weeks after completion the patient will be re-staged with rectal MRI and depending on the response will be operated (TME): immediately in case of non-response (mrTRG 5) or after an additional 6-week delay (overall 12 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy) in case of partial response (mrTRG 2-4). Adjuvant chemotherapy will be, also, administered.

    Radiation: Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy · Drug: Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Interventions

  • RadiationNeoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

    5-week neoadjuvant radiotherapy regimen (28 x 1.8 Gy) combined with Capecitabine (bid 800 mg/m2, twice daily, on days 1-33-38)

    Also known as: nCRT

  • DrugAdjuvant Chemotherapy

    8 cycles of CAPOX (Capecitabine bid 1000 mg/m2, twice daily, day 1-14, every 3 weeks and Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, day 1, every 3 weeks) or alternatively, 12 cycles of folinate, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)

    Also known as: AC

  • DrugConsolidation Chemotherapy

    CAPOX (Capecitabine bid1000 mg/m2 and Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, day 1, every 3 weeks) or alternatively FOLFOX

    Also known as: CC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease Free Survival

    Occurence of Disease Free Survival. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 3 years postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complete Pathological Response

    Occurence of Complete Pathological Response. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 1 month postoperatively

  2. Postoperative Complication

    Occurence of postoperative complications based on the Clavien Dindo Classification. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 1 month postoperatively

  3. Length of Hospital Stay

    Postoperative time that the patient can be safely discharged. Measurement unit: days. The patient will be discharged, when it is ensured that is medically safe to be released. In particular, as the exit time of the patient, will be regarded the time that the patient will fulfil the Clinical Discharge Criteria

    Time frame: Maximum time frame 39 days postoperatively

  4. Readmission

    Occurence of postoperative readmission. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 1 month postoperatively

  5. Negative Resection Margin

    Occurence of Negative Resection Margin. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 1 month postoperatively

  6. Overall Survival

    Occurence of Overall Survival. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 3 years postoperatively

  7. Chemotherapy Toxicity

    Occurence of Chemotherapy Toxicity. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 3 years postoperatively

  8. Local Recurrence

    Occurence of Local Recurrence. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 3 years postoperatively

  9. Treatment Compliance

    Occurence of Treatment Compliance. If such an episode occurs, then it will be defined as=1 'YES' If such an episode does not occur, then it will be defined as=0 'NO'

    Time frame: 3 years postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa
    Larissa, 41110, Greece
    Recruiting
    • Konstantinos Perivoliotis, MD · Contactkperi19@gmail.com · 00302413501000
    • George Tzovaras, Professor · Contactgtzovaras@hotmail.com · 00302413502804
    • Konstantinos Perivoliotis, MD · Principal investigator
    • Ioannis Baloyiannis, Prof · Sub investigator
    • Ioannis Samaras, MD · Sub investigator
    • Athanasios Kotsakis, Prof · Sub investigator
    • Georgios Kyrgias, Prof · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Liu S, Jiang T, Xiao L, Yang S, Liu Q, Gao Y, Chen G, Xiao W. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):e1555-e1566. doi: 10.1002/onco.13824. Epub 2021 Jun 7. PubMed 33987952 ↗
  • Kasi A, Abbasi S, Handa S, Al-Rajabi R, Saeed A, Baranda J, Sun W. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs Standard Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2030097. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30097. PubMed 33326026 ↗
  • Sutera P, Solomina J, Wegner RE, Abel S, Monga D, Finley G, McCormick J, Kirichenko AV. Post-Operative Morbidity and Mortality Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Conventional Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Sep;52(3):976-982. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00401-3. PubMed 32936391 ↗
  • Chang H, Jiang W, Ye WJ, Tao YL, Wang QX, Xiao WW, Gao YH. Is long interval from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery optimal for rectal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy?: a prospective observational study. Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Sep 21;11:6129-6138. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S169985. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30288048 ↗
  • Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Roodvoets AGH, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RGH, Blomqvist LK, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes A, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30555-6. Epub 2020 Dec 7. PubMed 33301740 ↗
  • Giunta EF, Bregni G, Pretta A, Deleporte A, Liberale G, Bali AM, Moretti L, Troiani T, Ciardiello F, Hendlisz A, Sclafani F. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Making sense of the results from the RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23 trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 May;96:102177. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102177. Epub 2021 Mar 16. PubMed 33798955 ↗
  • Shi DD, Mamon HJ. Playing With Dynamite? A Cautious Assessment of TNT. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 10;39(2):103-106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02199. Epub 2020 Oct 14. No abstract available. PubMed 33052753 ↗
  • Ludmir EB, Palta M, Willett CG, Czito BG. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: An emerging option. Cancer. 2017 May 1;123(9):1497-1506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30600. Epub 2017 Mar 10. PubMed 28295220 ↗
  • Petrelli F, Trevisan F, Cabiddu M, Sgroi G, Bruschieri L, Rausa E, Ghidini M, Turati L. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Outcomes. Ann Surg. 2020 Mar;271(3):440-448. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003471. PubMed 31318794 ↗
  • Conroy T, Bosset JF, Etienne PL, Rio E, Francois E, Mesgouez-Nebout N, Vendrely V, Artignan X, Bouche O, Gargot D, Boige V, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Louvet C, Morand C, de la Fouchardiere C, Lamfichekh N, Juzyna B, Jouffroy-Zeller C, Rullier E, Marchal F, Gourgou S, Castan F, Borg C; Unicancer Gastrointestinal Group and Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive (PRODIGE) Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):702-715. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00079-6. Epub 2021 Apr 13. PubMed 33862000 ↗
  • Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Quezada-Diaz F, Hameed I, Kalabin A, Patil S, Smith JJ, Garcia-Aguilar J. Organ Preservation in Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Dec 1;64(12):1463-1470. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002122. PubMed 34508014 ↗
  • Bauer PS, Chapman WC Jr, Atallah C, Makhdoom BA, Damle A, Smith RK, Wise PE, Glasgow SC, Silviera ML, Hunt SR, Mutch MG. Perioperative Complications After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Does Neoadjuvant Regimen Matter? Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):e428-e432. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003885. PubMed 32209914 ↗
  • Sclafani F, Corro C, Koessler T. Debating Pros and Cons of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 18;13(24):6361. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246361. PubMed 34944980 ↗
  • Fernandez-Martos C, Garcia-Albeniz X, Pericay C, Maurel J, Aparicio J, Montagut C, Safont MJ, Salud A, Vera R, Massuti B, Escudero P, Alonso V, Bosch C, Martin M, Minsky BD. Chemoradiation, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery: long-term results of the Spanish GCR-3 phase II randomized trialdagger. Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1722-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv223. Epub 2015 May 8. PubMed 25957330 ↗
  • Marco MR, Zhou L, Patil S, Marcet JE, Varma MG, Oommen S, Cataldo PA, Hunt SR, Kumar A, Herzig DO, Fichera A, Polite BN, Hyman NH, Ternent CA, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A, Dietz D, Yakunina Y, Pelossof R, Garcia-Aguilar J; Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium. Consolidation mFOLFOX6 Chemotherapy After Chemoradiotherapy Improves Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Oct;61(10):1146-1155. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001207. PubMed 30192323 ↗
  • Fang Y, Sheng C, Ding F, Zhao W, Guan G, Liu X. Adding Consolidation Capecitabine to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Study. Front Surg. 2022 Jan 27;8:770767. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.770767. eCollection 2021. PubMed 35155545 ↗
  • Chakrabarti D, Rajan S, Akhtar N, Qayoom S, Gupta S, Verma M, Srivastava K, Kumar V, Bhatt MLB, Gupta R. Short-course radiotherapy with consolidation chemotherapy versus conventionally fractionated long-course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2021 May 27;108(5):511-520. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab020. PubMed 33724296 ↗
  • Wu H, Fan C, Fang C, Huang L, Li Y, Zhou Z. Preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy for treatment with locally advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jan 24;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01974-4. PubMed 35073940 ↗
  • Seo N, Kim H, Cho MS, Lim JS. Response Assessment with MRI after Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidences. Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jul;20(7):1003-1018. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0611. PubMed 31270972 ↗
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2. PubMed 19638912 ↗
  • Chung F, Chan VW, Ong D. A post-anesthetic discharge scoring system for home readiness after ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Sep;7(6):500-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00130-a. PubMed 8534468 ↗
  • Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y. PubMed 30426190 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to share individual patient data

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2028, 72 months after the start.

Of 329 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Rectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 51 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78. This study's planned 72 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 336 studies reached it within 51 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 9, 2022
First posted
Aug 11, 2022
StartActual
Aug 30, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Aug 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Aug 30, 2029
Last update
Aug 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05496491
Lead sponsor
Larissa University Hospital
Responsible party
Perivoliotis Konstantinos (Perivoliotis Konstantinos, Principal Investigator, Larissa University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2022
Start date
Aug 30, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 26, 2026

Study contacts

Konstantinos Perivoliotis, MD
Contact
kperi19@gmail.com
2413501000 ext. 0030
George Tzovaras, Prof
Contact
gtzovaras@hotmail.com
2413502804 ext. 0030
Konstantinos Perivoliotis, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital of Larissa
George Tzovaras, Prof
study director · University Hospital of Larissa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion