ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05486468TYNIUpdated Oct 5, 2026

The Use of Two YUTIQ Versus Sham for Treatment of Chronic Non Infectious Intraocular Inflammation Affecting the Posterior Segment

A Phase 3 interventional study of Yutiq 0.18 MG Drug Implant and Sham Injection in Uveitis, Uveitis, Posterior and Uveitis, Anterior, sponsored by Texas Retina Associates. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Texas Retina Associates · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 5, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Use of Two YUTIQ versus Sham for Treatment of Chronic Non Infectious Intraocular Inflammation Affecting the Posterior Segment (TYNI Trial)

Read the detailed description

1.0 RATIONALE AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Primary Eyepoint Drug(s): YUTIQ

Study Rationale:

The current data shows that in eyes from patients with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis(NIPU), a single YUTIQ implant decreases the number of uveitis recurrences, led to less necessary adjunctive treatments, demonstrated less visual acuity loss, and had an acceptable side effect profile. Naturally, we asked whether two YUTIQ implants at the time of treatment would lead to an improved level of control of intraocular inflammation. We propose to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two YUTIQ implants versus two sham injections to manage inflammation associated with NIPU.

Needs Assessment:

Chronic noninfectious uveitis of the posterior segment of the eye is a visually debilitating disease to patients affected with it. Untreated or undertreated recurrent episodes of inflammation in these patients lead to permanent damage to the intraocular structures of the eye resulting in irreversible vision loss. Recent data has shown that a single YUTIQ implant demonstrated an improved level of control of intraocular inflammation, decreased frequency of uveitis flare ups, and led to less visual acuity loss compared to sham. However, there were still patients in the treatment group who had suboptimal control of their intraocular inflammation, experienced uveitis flares, and had a decrease in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). A study evaluating two YUTIQ implants for chronic NIPU would provide data to address whether this treatment paradigm would lead to superior outcomes and reduced treatment burden. There are currently no published prospective trials that have evaluated primary therapy with two YUTIQ implants.

In this study, we aim to compare the recurrence rate of uveitis by month 6 of two YUTIQ intravitreal implants to sha m. The clinical definition of intraocular inflammation recurrence is ( a 2 step or more increase in number of cells in the anterior chamber per high powered field (x1.6 using a 1 mm beam), ( a 2 step or more increase in vitreous haze, or ( a deterioration in BCVA of 15 letters or more. We expect a decreased rate of uveitis recurrences compared to sham. We also expect a decrease in inflammatory recurrences and increased time to first recurrence compared to prior data evaluating the use of a single YUTI Q implant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uveitis
  • Uveitis, Posterior
  • Uveitis, Anterior
  • Uveitis, Intermediate
03

In context

Uveitis

299 studies on the registry are indexed under Uveitis; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 30 across 175 interventional studies indexed under Uveitis.

Browse Uveitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Texas Retina Associates is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or non-pregnant female in good general health at least 18 years of age, understands the language of the , and is willing and able to provide written informed consent and sign/date a health information release (HIPAA form) before any study procedures are performed.
  2. Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures.

Ocular Inclusion Criteria (Study Eye):

  1. Diagnosed with chronic unilateral or bilateral noninfectious posterior segment inflammation (with or without anterior uveitis) that demonstrated a clinical response to ≥1 previous treatment of any localized type (eg, topical steroid 2 to 4 times per day or intra- or peri-ocular injection) or systemic corticosteroid/ treatment with recurrence following treatment indicating chronicity according to the Investigator's judgment.
  2. Presence of active posterior segment inflammation as determined by the Investigator.
  3. Vitreous haze grade ≥ 2 based on the standardization of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) criteria.
  4. Less than 10 anterior chamber cells/high power field determined by slit lamp examination.
  5. Not planning to undergo elective ocular surgery during the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with known to any components of YUTIQ.
  2. Female subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  3. Has any acute or chronic medical disease or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude participation in the study or put the subject at risk due to study treatment or procedures.

Ocular Exclusion Criteria (Study Eye):

  1. History of anterior uveitis only (without associated uveitis that affected the posterior segment).
  2. Presence of a vitreous hemorrhage.
  3. Uveitis with infectious etiology.
  4. Intraocular inflammation associated with a condition other than non-infectious uveitis (e.g., intraocular lymphoma).
  5. Current infectious diseases of the cornea and conjunctiva, mycobacterial infections of the eye, or fungal diseases of ocular structures.
  6. Subjects with ACIOL (Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens) or rupture of the posterior lens capsule.
  7. Diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension at screening, unless the study eye is being treated with ≤2 intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications and/or has been previously treated with an incisional surgical procedure resulting in stable IOP in the normal range (10 to 21 mmHg).
  8. Intraocular pressure >21 mmHg or concurrent therapy at screening with >2 IOP-lowering pharmacologic agents in the study eye.
  9. Any eye surgery within 12 weeks prior to Day 1 of the study.
  10. Subjects who are unable to attend scheduled follow-up visits throughout the 12-month study.
  11. Has a significant media opacity precluding evaluation of retina and vitreous in the study eye.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Arm

    This group will receive two YUTIQ implants at day 1.

    Drug: Yutiq 0.18 MG Drug Implant

  • Sham comparator
    Control Arm

    This group will receive two sham injections at day 1.

    Other: Sham Injection

Interventions

  • YUTIQ ® (fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant) 0.18 mg, for intravitreal injection

  • OtherSham Injection

    Sham injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence rate of uveitis will be assessed at the 6-month visit

    The primary endpoint of recurrence rate of uveitis will be assessed at the 6-month visit. The clinical definition of intraocular inflammation recurrence is (1) a 2-step or more increase in number of cells in the anterior chamber per high-powered field (x1.6 using a 1-mm beam), (2) a 2-step or more increase in vitreous haze, or (3) a deterioration in BCVA of 15 letters or more. In each case, the etiology of the change must be only due to noninfectious uveitis.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence rate of uveitis at the 12-month visit

    The secondary endpoints include determining the recurrence rate of uveitis at the 12-month visit, time to first uveitis recurrence, change in BCVA from baseline by ETDRS letters read at the 12-month visit, total number of necessary adjunctive treatments necessary, mean changes in CST as measured by SD-OCT, and mean changes from baseline in BCVA by ETDRS letters read. A final secondary endpoint will be to evaluate the changes in vascular leakage on FA, which will qualitatively be determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Texas Retina Associates
    Plano, Texas 75075, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2026→Mar 31, 2026 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Study completion
Dec 2026→Mar 31, 2026 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Enrollment
30 (estimated)→10 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Jul 2026→Mar 31, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 2026→Mar 31, 2026 (now actual)
    Enrollment 30 (estimated)→10 (actual)
    + 3 other changes: verification date, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05486468
Lead sponsor
Texas Retina Associates
Collaborators
Eye Point Pharmaceuticals, ANI Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2022
Start date
Oct 5, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2026
Completion
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fluocinolone Acetonide

Start the discussion