CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01295112Updated Sep 25, 2025Results posted

Effect of Ozurdex® 0.7 mg on Improvement of Efficacy of Bevacizumab for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Active bevacizumab and Sham dexamethasone and Active bevacizumab and Active dexamethasone in Non-Ischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion, sponsored by Texas Retina Associates. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-25.

Sponsored by Texas Retina Associates · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study designed to determine if the addition of Ozurdex® to bevacizumab (Avastin®) eye injections reduces the need for repeat bevacizumab eye injections in patients with nonischemic central retina vein occlusion.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter clinical study designed to determine if the addition of Ozurdex® injection to bevacizumab (Avastin®) eye injections reduces the need for repeat bevacizumab eye injections in patients with nonischemic central retina vein occlusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Ischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. male or female subjects (aged 18 or older);
  2. provide written informed consent and sign/date a health information release;
  3. women of childbearing potential must be willing to practice effective contraception for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. any systemic disease or clinical evidence of any condition which would make the subject, in the opinion of the investigator, unsuitable for the study or could potentially confound the study results;
  2. use of systemic steroids within 1 month prior to Baseline Visit (Visit 1) or anticipated use at any time during the study (inhaled and intranasal steroids are allowed);
  3. sitting systolic blood pressure equal to or greater than 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure equal to or greater than 100 mmHg at the Baseline Visit (Visit 1);
  4. use of warfarin, heparin, enoxaparin or similar anticoagulants within 2 weeks prior to Baseline Visit (Visit 1) or anticipated use at any time during the study;
  5. known allergy or hypersensitivity to the study medications or their components;
  6. previous enrollment in an Ozurdex® clinical trial or previous use of an Ozurdex® implant.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Group 1

    Active bevacizumab (Avastin®) and Sham Ozurdex®

    Drug: Active bevacizumab and Sham dexamethasone

  • Active comparator
    Group 2

    Active bevacizumab (Avastin®) and Active Ozurdex®

    Drug: Active bevacizumab and Active dexamethasone

Interventions

  • DrugActive bevacizumab and Sham dexamethasone

    Bevacizumab: 25 mg/mL, PRN dosing Sham dexamethasone intravitreal implant: blunt needling of the sclera with no penetration of the globe

    Also known as: Avastin® (bevacizumab), Ozurdex® (dexamethasone intravitreal implant)

  • DrugActive bevacizumab and Active dexamethasone

    Bevacizumab: 25 mg/mL, PRN dosing Dexamethasone intravitreal implant: 0.7 mg, single dose

    Also known as: Avastin® (bevacizumab), Ozurdex® (dexamethasone intravitreal implant)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Total Number of PRN Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injections Through 24 Weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Secondary Efficacy Endpoint is the Visual Acuity Score Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24

    The secondary efficacy endpoint is the visual acuity score based on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at Week 24 Change in BCVA at Week 24 from baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

06

Results

Posted Oct 18, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Limitations of this study included the relatively small size of 68 eyes, however statistical analyses were robust. The sample size was small due to the disease of study being a rare disease of study so the sample size is limited.

Participant flow

A total of 68 participants ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) as determined by fundus photography and fluorescein angiography were enrolled in the study at 5 clinical centers.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1Group 2
Started3533
Completed3533
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Total Number of PRN Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injections Through 24 Weeks
Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Total Number of PRN Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injections Through 24 Weeks
ParticipantsGroup 1Group 2
0 PRN Injections519
1 PRN Injection1311
2 PRN Injections103
3 PRN Injections60
4 PRN Injections10
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1 vs Group 2 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.00002
SecondaryThe Secondary Efficacy Endpoint is the Visual Acuity Score Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24

The secondary efficacy endpoint is the visual acuity score based on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at Week 24 Change in BCVA at Week 24 from baseline

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · letters
The Secondary Efficacy Endpoint is the Visual Acuity Score Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24
lettersGroup 1Group 2
The Secondary Efficacy Endpoint is the Visual Acuity Score Based on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 2416.20 ± 15.4913.55 ± 19.41
Statistical analysis
  • Group 1 vs Group 2 · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.53 (The p-value is assume superiority. The 95% upper confidence (upper end of the 90% Confidence interval) interval for the non-inferiority analysis is provided below.) · Mean difference (final values): 2.51 · 90% CI -4.43 to 9.74

Adverse events

Collected over 24 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 10/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Group 20/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group 1Group 2Total
Mean66.4 ± 15.070.7 ± 12.668.5 ± 14.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Female131629
Male221739
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Asian112
Black213
Caucasian252449
Hispanic5510
Not Reported224
Previous Injections
Previous Injections(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Bevacizumab5813
No Injection222143
Ranibizumab437
Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab112
Bevacizumab and Aflibercept303
Study Eye
Study Eye(Participants)Group 1Group 2Total
Right Eye181533
Left Eye171835
Baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Study Eye
Baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Study Eye(letters)Group 1Group 2Total
Mean49.6 ± 18.255.7 ± 17.252.5 ± 17.8
Baselinen best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Fellow Eye
Baselinen best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Fellow Eye(letters)Group 1Group 2Total
Mean82.0 ± 12.682.2 ± 9.682.1 ± 11.2
Baseline Central Foveal Thickness in Study Eye
Baseline Central Foveal Thickness in Study Eye(microns)Group 1Group 2Total
Mean264.5 ± 68.9262.1 ± 70.0263.3 ± 68.8

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Texas Retina Associates
    Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01295112
Lead sponsor
Texas Retina Associates
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2015
Completion
Oct 2015
Results posted
Oct 18, 2017
Last update
Sep 25, 2025

Study contacts

Karl Csaky, MD
principal investigator · Texas Retina Associates

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion