An interventional study of Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and Cyclophosphamide/ATG in Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, sponsored by Scripps Health. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 58 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-09.
Sponsored by Scripps Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study is designed to compare two non-myeloablative conditioning regimens (combination of chemotherapy and immune specific proteins against immune cells) for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The two conditioning regimens are the most commonly used world wide in clinical practice for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The first investigational conditioning regimen is cyclophosphamide (chemotherapy) and rATG (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, a protein against immune cells). The second investigational conditioning regimen includes the same dose of cyclophosphamide (chemotherapy) and rituximab (a protein against immune cells). Both cyclophosphamide and either rATG or rituximab are given to kill immune cells that are thought to be causing MS, followed by return of one's own previously collected blood stem cells (autologous stem cell transplant) to hasten recovery. The goal of this study is to assess the difference of these treatments in terms of toxicity and efficacy.
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) halts disease progression, improves neurologic disability and quality of life, and provides a prolonged drug-free remission. A "position paper" by neurologists and hematologists under the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) has recommended autologous HSCT as standard of care, clinical evidence available, for treatment-refractory relapsing MS with high risk of future disability. Similarly, the EBMT has recommended the use of HSCT as "standard or care" for patients with highly active RRMS failing at least one DMT. Currently, the optimal conditioning regimen in terms of safety and efficacy is unknown. Herein, we will compare the two most commonly used regimens cyclophosphamide/ATG, or cyclophosphamide/rituximab in terms of safety and efficacy.
615 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; 80 are open to participants now.
Browse Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting studies →Scripps Health is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
RRMS with a history of:
Exclusion Criteria:
Hepatic:
Pulmonary:
Renal:
Cardiac:
Hematology
Infection:
d) active infection at time of hospital admission (except UTI)
Cyclophosphamide (200 mg /kg) / rabbit antithymocyte globulin (6.0 mg/kg)
Other: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Drug: Cyclophosphamide/ATG
Cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) / rituximab (1000 mg).
Other: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation · Drug: Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Drug pages: Cyclophosphamide · Antilymphocyte Serum
Cyclophosphamide/ATG
Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab
Durability of remission between two arms
Defined as the time to first confirmed acute relapse or 5 years after treatment which ever comes first
Time frame: Time to first confirmed acute relapse or 5 years after treatment which ever comes first
Neurologic Disability
Defined by change in EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale, ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 normal and 10 worst)
Time frame: From initiation of study to completion, up until 5 years after treatment
Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 54 months after the start.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drugs tested here: Cyclophosphamide · Antilymphocyte Serum
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting →
Scripps Health