An interventional study of Multimodal affect recognition training and Attention Training in Brain Injury and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-02.
Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Poor emotion recognition has been associated with poor quality of interpersonal relationships, loss of employment, behavioral problems, reduced social reintegration, social isolation and even suicide. Deficits in emotion recognition are common in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but these deficits have not been well studied in Veterans with both mild TBI (mTBI) and PTSD. Currently there are no interventions for emotion recognition in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, and interventions for severe TBI have lacked training of both facial and vocal emotion recognition. In a preliminary study of an innovative combination of facial and vocal modalities, a multimodal affect recognition training (MMART) showed promise but lacked attention training that is an essential component in recognizing emotions in our daily lives. Given the need to improve relationships and productivity in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, a study is needed to determine the effectiveness of a MMART combined with attention training.
Background. Deficits in emotion recognition are common in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but these deficits have not been well studied in Veterans with both mild TBI (mTBI) and PTSD. Poor emotion recognition has been associated with poor quality of interpersonal relationships, loss of employment, behavioral problems, reduced social reintegration, social isolation and even suicide. Currently there are no interventions for emotion recognition deficits in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, and interventions conducted in civilians with severe TBI have lacked training of both facial and vocal emotion recognition. In a preliminary study of an innovative combination of facial and vocal modalities, a multimodal affect recognition training (MMART) showed promise with significant improvement on the Florida Affect Battery (FAB) but lacked attention training that is an essential component in recognizing rapidly changing emotions in our everyday lives. Attention training using Brain HQ targets the required attention factors underlying emotion recognition. Given the need to improve relationships and productivity in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, a randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the effectiveness of an innovative MMART combined with attention training to improve emotion recognition and everyday function.
Objective \& Hypotheses. The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the treatment effect of a MultiModal Affect Recognition Training (MMART) combined with attention training in Veterans with TBI/PTSD.
Hypothesis 1. MMART combined with attention training will significantly improve performance on tests of emotion recognition.
Hypothesis 2: Treatment gains will translate to functional activities. Primary measures. Florida Affect Battery (FAB) and the Community Reintegration in Service members (CRIS).
Secondary measures. Emotion Recognition Task (ERT), attention index of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), the Continuous Performance Task and the TBI Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities.
Methods. 20 Veterans with mTBI and PTSD will be randomized to either the combined training or an inactive control group. Both groups will attend 16, one-hour in-person sessions over 8 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at pre-, post-, 3 month-post-treatment. A linear regression will be used to determine significant improvement of the treatment group over the control group, with t-tests to demonstrate within group improvement. Effect size calculations will be used to determine the power needed for a future Merit proposal.
2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.
Browse Brain Injuries studies →VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.
Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Training to recognize affect and prosodic expressions of emotions combined with attention training.
Behavioral: Multimodal affect recognition training · Behavioral: Attention Training
an inactive arm that matches sessions of intervention. BHW is education about the brain and cognition. National Geographic movies are viewed with the clinician and the participant answers questions about the movies.
Behavioral: Brain Health Workshop · Behavioral: National Geographic Movies
8 session, trains participants to recognize expression of emotion from a variety of stimuli, including dynamic stimuli (e.g., video instead of still pictures) and it employs both facial and vocal examples of emotion expression.
Also known as: MMART
computerized attention drill training
Also known as: Brain HQ
an education presentation on brain function and cognitive principles of learning with homework and quizzes on information covered.
Also known as: BHW
participant will watch movies and answer questions after
Also known as: movies
Florida Affect Battery (FAB), assessing change
A standardized assessment of emotional affect and prosody recognition. normative scores range from 0-100 for each of the 12 subscales. Higher scores indicate better emotion recognition.
Time frame: week 1, week 11, week 22
Community Reintegration of Service Members, assessing change
Satisfaction questionnaire of community participation. Scores range from .43 to 2.15. 43 items with five rating options of 1-5. Higher scores indicate better community participation.
Time frame: week 1, week 11, week 22
Emotion Recognition Task, assessing change
Computerized assessment of emotional affect recognition. Correct responses range from 0-48 (higher scores indicate better emotion recognition) and correct response time ranges from 0 to infinity (lower scores indicate quicker response time).
Time frame: week 1, week 11, week 22
Continuous Performance Task, assessing change
Computerized measures of sustained attention. 100 trials with accuracy ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicate better attention) and response time from 0-60 (lower scores indicate quicker response time).
Time frame: week 1, week 11, week 22
Attention Index of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, assessing change
Digit span and symbol digit to assess attention. Scaled scores range from 1-19, with higher scores indicating better attention.
Time frame: week 1, week 11, week 22
Traumatic Brain injury quality of life
Quality of life questionnaire about community participation. 59 items with scores ranging from 59-295, with higher scores indicating better community participation.
Time frame: week 1, week 11, week 22
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Final data sets will be maintained locally and a de-identified, anonymized dataset will be made available in response to specific requests that meet the criteria described within this document and to data repositories i.e. FITBIR.
Supporting information: Analytic code
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
VA Office of Research and Development