ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05476003Updated Aug 1, 2022

Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block After Thyroid Surgery

An interventional study of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block and Midazolam in Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block, Thyroid Surgery and Enhanced Recovery, sponsored by Tanta University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-01.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluating ultrasound guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block as a part of enhanced recovery after thyroid surgery using Quality of Recovery-15 scale as a method for assessment of quality of recovery.

Read the detailed description

Surgery of the thyroid gland is increasingly popular performed as ambulatory procedures in many countries. Postoperative wound pain is a common complication, especially within 24 hr after thyroid surgery, which may delay discharge or even unplanned readmissions following day surgery.

Several strategies, including local and regional anesthesia, are now performed as core components of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain. Adequate postoperative pain relief is imperative to improve functional outcome, accelerate early ambulation and discharge from the hospital.

Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block was introduced by Tran et al . The main advantages of Ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block include: provide real-time visualization of anatomical structures, reduced volumes of local anesthetics, and avoid inadvertent damage or accidental puncture of vessels.

Owing to its feasibility and efficacy, ultrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block is a technique for providing adequate regional analgesia during thyroidectomy with improvement of patient recovery.

Quality of recovery after anesthesia is an important measure of the early postoperative health status of patients. Based on extensive clinical and research experience with the 40-item Quality of Recovery-40, the strongest psychometrically performing items from each of the five dimensions of the Quality of Recovery-40 were selected to create a short-form version. The Quality of Recovery-15 provides a valid, extensive, and yet efficient evaluation of postoperative Quality of Recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bilateral Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block
  • Thyroid Surgery
  • Enhanced Recovery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 987 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 21 to 65 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II.
  • Scheduled for elective thyroid surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to participate.
  • Patients with history of allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Patients with history of chronic use of pain killers .
  • Patients presented with mental dysfunction.
  • Patients with coagulation disorders.
  • Patients presented with skin or soft tissue infection at the proposed site of needle Insertion.
  • Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Body Mass Index more than 40.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Technique

    Patients will receive general anesthesia plus Ultrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with injection of 10 ml normal saline bilaterally.

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block · Drug: Midazolam

  • Active comparator
    Ultrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block

    Patients will receive general anesthesia plus Ultrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block with injection of total volume 10 ml containing Bupivacaine 0.25% (5 ml Bupivacaine 0.5 % and 5 ml normal saline).

    Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block · Drug: Midazolam

Interventions

  • ProcedureUltrasound-guided Bilateral superficial cervical plexus block

    This nerve block is typically performed in the supine or semi-sitting position, with the head turned slightly away from the side to be blocked to facilitate operator access. Under strict aseptic condition, the linear ultrasound transducer should be placed on the lateral neck, overlying the sternocleidomastoid muscle at the level of its midpoint (approximately the level of the cricoid cartilage). Once the sternocleidomastoid muscle has been identified, the transducer is moved posteriorly until the tapering posterior edge is positioned in the middle of the screen. Once the plexus has been identified and using In-Plane approach, the needle is passed from medial to lateral through the skin, platysma and investing layer of deep cervical fascia and the tip is placed adjacent to the plexus. Following negative aspiration, 1 mL of local anesthetic is injected to confirm the proper injection site. The remainder of the local anesthetic (5ml) is administered to envelop the plexus.

  • All patients will be premedicated with Midazolam (0.02mg/Kg).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of recovery

    Improvement of the quality of recovery assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire. The Quality of Recovery-15 included 15 items 1-Breathing 2-Food 3-Rest 4-Sleep 5-Hygiene 6-Communication 7-Support 8-Return to work 9-Feeling comfortable and in control 10-Feeling of general well-being 10-Moderate pain 12-Severe pain 13-Nausea/Vomitting 14-Worry/Anxiety 15-Feeling sad or depressed . Each item will be assessed using a10-point numerical rating scale. The total score of Quality of Recovery-15 ranges from 0 (extremely poor recovery) to 150 (all excellent recovery).

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative analgesia

    Postoperative analgesia defined by the visual analogue scale score 30 min after arrival to recovery room then after 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hr. If visual analogue scale˃ 3 , morphine 3 mg will be given .

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  2. Opioid consumption

    Total post operative opioid requirement will be recorded

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  3. Diaphragmatic Excursion

    Diaphragmatic Excursion assessed by Ultrasound

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05476003
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Fatma Elsamahy (Dr, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 27, 2022
Start date
Aug 15, 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 15, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 1, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Midazolam

Start the discussion