A Phase 1 interventional study of Navitoclax and Venetoclax in Myeloid Malignancy, Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelofibrosis, sponsored by Jacqueline Garcia, MD. Active, not recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.
Sponsored by Jacqueline Garcia, MD · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this research study is to test the safety of a new three drug combination of navitoclax, decitabine, and venetoclax to treat advanced myeloid malignancies.
The names of the drugs involved in this study are:
This is a phase 1 study to determine the safety, dosing schedule and recommended phase 2 dose of a triplet therapy with navitoclax, venetoclax, and decitabine for patients with the four high-risk myeloid malignancy subgroups of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) and myelofibrosis accelerated phase (MF-AP).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved the combination of venetoclax, navitoclax, and decitabine navitoclax as a treatment for any disease.The FDA has approved the combination of venetoclax and decitabine for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and decitabine given alone is approved for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
The research study procedures include screening for eligibility, study treatments, and blood tests and bone marrow biopsies to assess response to treatment.
Participants will receive the study treatment regimen as long as it is effective.
It is expected that about 36 people will take part in this research study.
AbbVie, a pharmaceutical company, is supporting this research study by providing funding and the study drugs navitoclax and venetoclax.
Subjects must have a diagnosis of one of the following:
Subjects must have adequate organ function as defined below:
If female, subject must be either :
Exclusion Criteria:
Evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled condition(s) including, but not limited to:
Administration or consumption of any of the following within 3 days prior to the first dose of study drug:
Active and known SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Dose Level 0 \[AML and Non-AML\] Decitabine \[intravenously (IV) preferred\] Venetoclax Cycle 1: ramp-up days 1-2 and days 3-14 absence of strong/moderate CYP3A inhibitor and reduced doses dependent on presence of moderate or strong CYP3A inhibitor Cycle 2+: dosing days 1-14 Navitoclax Cycle 1: dosing days 3-14; Cycle 2+: dosing on days 1-14 Cycle length=28 days Participants are treated indefinitely until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal for other reasons.
Drug: Navitoclax · Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Decitabine
Dose Level 1 \[AML and Non-AML\] Decitabine \[intravenously (IV) preferred\] Cycle 1+: dosing on days 1-5 Venetoclax \[orally\] Cycle 1: ramp-up starting on day 1-2 then days 3-14 continued dosing in absence of strong/moderate CYP3A inhibitor and reduced doses dependent on presence of moderate or strong CYP3A inhibitor Cycle 2+: dosing days 1-14 Navitoclax \[orally\] Cycle 1: Dosing days 3-14 Cycle 2+: dosing on days 1-14 Cycle length=28 days Participants are treated indefinitely until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal for other reasons.
Drug: Navitoclax · Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Decitabine
Dose Level 2 \[AML\] Decitabine \[intravenously (IV) preferred\] Cycle 1+: dosing on days 1-5 Venetoclax \[orally\] Cycle 1: ramp-up on day 1-2, days 3-21 continued dosing in absence of strong/moderate CYP3A inhibitor and reduced doses dependent on presence of moderate or strong CYP3A inhibitor Cycle 2+: dosing on days 1-21 Navitoclax \[orally\] Cycle 1: dosing on days 3-14 Cycle 2+: dosing on days 1-14 Cycle length=28 days Participants are treated indefinitely until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal for other reasons.
Drug: Navitoclax · Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Decitabine
Dose Level -1 \[Non-AML\] Decitabine \[intravenously (IV) preferred\] Cycle 1+:dosing \[intravenously (IV) preferred\] on days 1-3 Venetoclax \[orally\] Cycle 1: ramp-up of starting day 1-2 then days 3-7 continued dosing in absence of strong/moderate CYP3A inhibitor and reduced doses dependent on presence of moderate or strong CYP3A inhibitor Cycle 2+: dosing on days 1-7 Navitoclax \[orally\] Cycle 1: Dosing days 3-14 Cycle 2+: continued dosing on days 1-14 Cycle length=28 days Participants are treated indefinitely until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal for other reasons.
Drug: Navitoclax · Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Decitabine
RP2D \[AML and Non-AML\] Decitabine \[intravenously (IV) preferred\] To be determined based on dose escalation design. Venetoclax \[orally\] To be determined based on dose escalation design. Navitoclax \[orally\] To be determined based on dose escalation design. Cycle length=28 days Participants are treated indefinitely until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal for other reasons.
Drug: Navitoclax · Drug: Venetoclax · Drug: Decitabine
See Arm Description
Also known as: ABT-263
See Arm Description
Also known as: Venclexta
See Arm Description
Also known as: Dacogen
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
The RP2D is the minimally safe and biologically effective dose. The minimally safe dose is the highest dose level at which \<2 of 6 participants experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See subsequent primary outcome for the DLT definition. With respect to safety, the RP2D will also consider laboratory evidence of platelet recovery. Evaluation of efficacy will be done in real time prioritizing full complete response (see subsequent secondary outcome for the objective response criteria) when possible for AML/MDS/MDS-MPN and transfusion independence/blast reduction/TSS improvement/splenic reduction for myelofibrosis.
Time frame: The observation period for RP2D evaluation was the first 28 days (cycle 1) of treatment.
Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
DLT is defined by hematologic or non-hematologic adverse event (AE) per protocol (section 5.4); A treatment-related death is a DLT; AEs are graded based on NCI CTCAE v5.0 and must be considered unrelated to the underlying disease or co-morbidity to be a DLT.
Time frame: The observation period for DLT evaluation was the first 28 days (cycle 1) of treatment.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Response criteria follows consensus guidelines set forth by international working groups for MF, MDS (MDS: CR, marrow CR, PR, HI), MDS/MPN overlap syndromes, and AML. ORR, evaluated by disease type, is defined as the proportion of participants achieving objective response per protocol (section 11.1) on treatment: * AP/BP-MF: CR, PR, Clinical Improvement * MDS: CR, marrow CR, PR, HI * CMML: CR, PR, marrow CR * s-AML: CR, CRi, CRp
Time frame: Bone marrow evaluation for disease response is performed end of C1, C2, every 2 cycles until CR/CRi and then every 3 cycles. Each cycle is 28 days. Time frame is indefinite as based on maximum treatment duration which is not fixed.
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study treatment to evidence of progression (for MDS per IWG 2006 criteria; for AML per ELN 2017 criteria; for MF per IWG criteria, defined per protocol section 11.1) or at death due to any cause including underlying disease. Participants alive without disease progression are censored at date of last follow up.
Time frame: Bone marrow evaluation for disease response is performed days 22-28 of C1, end of C2, every 2 cycles (cycle end) until CR/CRi and then every 3 cycles. Off treatment, disease is assessed every 4 months up to 2 years.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study entry to death or censored at date last known alive.
Time frame: Survival is assessed in long-term follow-up every 4 months up to 2 years.
Navitoclax Target Dose Rate
The navitoclax target dose rate is the proportion of participants without navitoclax dose modifications on treatment per protocol.
Time frame: While on study treatment for up 1 year
Plan to share: Yes — The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: \[contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee\]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Jacqueline Garcia, MD