CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05427201Updated Jul 17, 2026Results posted

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

An interventional study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Chronic Pain and Depression, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-17.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
31
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Veterans with comorbid chronic pain and depression are highly prevalent, have poor functional status and low quality of life, are at increased risk of suicide and lack access to effective treatments. To address this problem, the proposed research will examine the feasibility of a novel approach that integrates repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with the overall goal of maximizing functional improvement in Veterans with chronic pain and depression. This is an important first-step in preparation for a future randomized efficacy trial. The investigators will also include two cognitive control tasks with concurrent electroencephalography to explore as a potential objective indicator of treatment response. This application addresses a critical need within the Veterans Health Administration and is closely aligned with the focus area of developing suicide prevention treatments that influence participation in life roles.

Read the detailed description

Comorbid depression is highly prevalent in Veterans with chronic pain and contributes to greater pain severity, functional impairment, and suicide risk relative to those with chronic pain alone. Despite the well-known association between chronic pain and depression, current treatments fall short of producing meaningful improvements in function and quality of life in this population. In this application, the investigators propose to address this problem by a novel intervention that combines repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).

ACT is an evidence-based psychosocial intervention that improves function in Veterans with chronic pain. However, similar to the broader literature, comorbid depression significantly limits the efficacy of ACT, which may be directly related to dysfunctional brain circuits that maintain depression. rTMS is a non-invasive brain stimulation intervention that is FDA-cleared for the treatment of depression. The most commonly targeted stimulation area is the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLFPC), a prefrontal brain region involved in cognitive control and emotion regulation. rTMS over the left DLPFC has also been used to reduce pain intensity in patients with chronic pain, as the DLPFC is implicated in the affective processing of painful stimuli. Importantly, while rTMS has been shown to reduce depression severity and pain intensity, it does not directly address function. Thus, the proposed research will integrate rTMS and ACT with the goal of maximizing functional improvement in Veterans with chronic pain and depression.

The purpose of this application is to examine the feasibility of a future randomized efficacy trial. A total of 24 Veterans with chronic pain and depression will be randomized into DLPFC-rTMS + ACT or sham-rTMS + ACT conditions. Multiple metrics of feasibility will be assessed, including general interest in the study, willingness to participate, enrollment, retention, drop-out, number of adverse events, and participant blindness to condition, as well as ratings of credibility, expectation, and treatment satisfaction. The investigators will also estimate the preliminary impact of DLPFC-rTMS + ACT and sham-rTMS + ACT on function as measured by reductions in pain interference (primary clinical outcome). The intent of preliminary analyses is to obtain an additional indicator for a future large-scale trial, not to verify group differences. Further, the investigators will include two cognitive control tasks, the Emotion Distractor and Attention-to-Breath tasks, with concurrent EEG recording as a potential objective indicator of treatment response. The study team has previously demonstrated the association between depression severity and DLPFC activity on these tasks. In the proposed study, the investigators will explore the associations between treatment-related change in DLPFC activity and treatment outcomes.

Veterans with chronic pain and depression do not have access to effective treatments. To address this need, the investigators seek to examine the feasibility of a novel approach by integrating a somatic and a psychosocial intervention. The investigator's scientific premise is that rTMS over the left DLPFC will remediate hypofunction of prefrontal brain circuits that is necessary to maximize the impact of ACT on function in Veterans with chronic pain and depression. Findings from the proposed research have the potential of substantially increasing the physical and psychosocial functioning of Veterans with chronic pain and depression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain
  • Depression

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Depression
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Acceptance and commitment therapy
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 31 is below the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of a chronic, non-terminal pain condition (pain most days for at least 6 months)
  • Average pain intensity and interference with enjoyment of life and/or general activity rated > 4/10 over the past week, as measured by the PEG
  • Meet clinical criteria for major depression via DSM5 criteria, as assessed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious or unstable medical illness (e.g., cardiovascular disease)
  • Lifetime history of psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • Active substance abuse or psychosocial instability (e.g., homelessness) that could compromise study participation
  • Changes to professionally delivered pain or mood treatment (e.g., no discontinuation of a treatment; no increasing the dose of medication) one month preceding the baseline assessment
  • Significant neurologic disorder, increased risk of seizure for any reason or family/personal history of seizure
  • Contraindications to rTMS treatment as outlined by the Safety of TMS Consensus group, which includes implanted metallic objects above the neck, implanted electrical devices (pacemakers/spinal cord stimulators), and pregnancy
  • Prior trial of rTMS for any condition and/or lack of responsiveness to electroconvulsive therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
31 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DLPFC-rTMS + ACT

    Active DLPFC-rTMS with ACT treatment

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation · Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Sham-rTMS + ACT

    Sham delivered rTMS with ACT treatment

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    rTMS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique designed to alter network function

    Also known as: rTMS

  • BehavioralAcceptance and Commitment Therapy

    ACT is a mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral intervention that has demonstrated efficacy for chronic pain.

    Also known as: ACT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PROMIS Pain Interference Change

    The PROMIS Pain Interference questionnaire consists of 8-items that assess the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life, including mobility, social activity, and mood. Items are scored on a 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very much") scale with a range of 8 - 40. These scores are subsequently transcribed to a T-score. PROMIS measures are reported as standardized T-scores with a population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference. A 10-point difference represents one standard deviation from the reference population mean.

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during ACT intervention, 9 weeks (post-treatment) for total of 10 timepoints

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Change

    The PHQ-9 is a widely used measure of depressive symptoms. Items are scored on a 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day") scale with a range of 0 - 27. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during ACT intervention, 9 weeks (post-treatment) for total of 10 timepoints

  2. PROMIS Pain Intensity Change

    The PROMIS Pain Intensity questionnaire consists of 3 items assessing worst and average pain over the past week, as well as current pain. Items are scored on a 1 ("No pain") to 5 ("Very severe") scale with a range of 3 - 15. Total scores are subsequently converted to T-scores. PROMIS measures are reported as standardized T-scores with a population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. A 10-point difference represents one standard deviation from the reference population mean.

    Time frame: Baseline, weekly during ACT intervention, 9 weeks (post-treatment) for total of 10 timepoints

07

Results

Posted Jul 17, 2026

Participant flow

Enrollment began in May 2023 and concluded in February 2025. Participants were recruited via study flyer and referral from the Neuromodulation Program, Mental Health, Behavioral Medicine, and Primary Care clinics at VA San Diego Healthcare System.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDLPFC-TMS + ACTSham-TMS + ACT
Started109
Completed109
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPROMIS Pain Interference Change

The PROMIS Pain Interference questionnaire consists of 8-items that assess the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life, including mobility, social activity, and mood. Items are scored on a 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very much") scale with a range of 8 - 40. These scores are subsequently transcribed to a T-score. PROMIS measures are reported as standardized T-scores with a population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference. A 10-point difference represents one standard deviation from the reference population mean.

Time frame:
Baseline, weekly during ACT intervention, 9 weeks (post-treatment) for total of 10 timepoints
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
PROMIS Pain Interference Change
T-scoreDLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACT
Baseline68.54 ± 6.8966.30 ± 6.85
Week 166.51 ± 4.5059.67 ± 8.76
Week 265.00 ± 5.2260.62 ± 5.36
Week 366.20 ± 5.7160.50 ± 7.10
Week 466.18 ± 6.9658.59 ± 8.46
Week 563.85 ± 6.0358.33 ± 6.30
Week 663.32 ± 6.3157.81 ± 7.51
Week 762.36 ± 7.1456.33 ± 7.34
Week 863.23 ± 7.3456.07 ± 7.35
Week 9, Post-treatment65.57 ± 7.8557.13 ± 8.07
Statistical analysis
  • DLPFC-rTMS + ACT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.142 · Slope: -0.38 · 95% CI -0.85 to 0.08
  • Sham-rTMS + ACT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.03 · Slope: -0.88 · 95% CI -1.53 to -0.23
SecondaryPatient Health Questionnaire-9 Change

The PHQ-9 is a widely used measure of depressive symptoms. Items are scored on a 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("Nearly every day") scale with a range of 0 - 27. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, weekly during ACT intervention, 9 weeks (post-treatment) for total of 10 timepoints
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Change
units on a scaleDLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACT
Baseline16.80 ± 5.0513.44 ± 4.93
Week 115.00 ± 5.1210.89 ± 5.01
Week 215.10 ± 5.579.78 ± 4.02
Week 313.20 ± 5.5312.00 ± 5.94
Week 415.60 ± 5.1711.11 ± 4.51
Week 513.30 ± 5.509.89 ± 3.76
Week 612.67 ± 6.428.78 ± 5.19
Week 711.63 ± 6.959.50 ± 3.57
Week 811.56 ± 6.237.67 ± 3.97
Week 9, post-treatment12.20 ± 6.138.00 ± 3.71
Statistical analysis
  • DLPFC-rTMS + ACT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = .032 · Slope: -0.48 · 95% CI -0.85 to -0.11
  • Sham-rTMS + ACT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.02 · Slope: -0.53 · 95% CI -0.89 to -0.18
SecondaryPROMIS Pain Intensity Change

The PROMIS Pain Intensity questionnaire consists of 3 items assessing worst and average pain over the past week, as well as current pain. Items are scored on a 1 ("No pain") to 5 ("Very severe") scale with a range of 3 - 15. Total scores are subsequently converted to T-scores. PROMIS measures are reported as standardized T-scores with a population mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. A 10-point difference represents one standard deviation from the reference population mean.

Time frame:
Baseline, weekly during ACT intervention, 9 weeks (post-treatment) for total of 10 timepoints
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
PROMIS Pain Intensity Change
T-scoreDLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACT
Baseline56.20 ± 5.0155.33 ± 3.33
Week 156.19 ± 6.8154.17 ± 4.10
Week 253.23 ± 7.1751.60 ± 4.46
Week 355.15 ± 5.5150.24 ± 6.74
Week 456.43 ± 6.8548.96 ± 6.67
Week 556.06 ± 5.2549.76 ± 6.08
Week 655.06 ± 4.5548.41 ± 5.76
Week 754.99 ± 6.1449.44 ± 5.43
Week 854.82 ± 7.4848.78 ± 6.28
Week 9, post-treatment56.02 ± 8.8648.46 ± 6.73
Statistical analysis
  • DLPFC-rTMS + ACT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.94 · Slope: 0.02 · 95% CI -0.42 to 0.45
  • Sham-rTMS + ACT · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.01 · Slope: -0.73 · 95% CI -1.11 to -0.34

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were assessed at each rTMS session, up to 9 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DLPFC-rTMS + ACT0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)6/10 (60%)
Sham-rTMS + ACT0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)7/9 (77.8%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventDLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACT
HeadacheGeneral disorders5/104/9
FatigueGeneral disorders3/101/9
Tingling around TMS stimulation siteGeneral disorders1/102/9
NauseaGeneral disorders0/102/9
Muscle SorenessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/101/9
Eye twitchGeneral disorders2/100/9
Ringing in earsGeneral disorders0/101/9
DepressionPsychiatric disorders0/101/9
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders0/101/9
ToothacheGeneral disorders0/101/9

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years of age)DLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACTTotal
Mean43.90 ± 10.7542.00 ± 13.0743.00 ± 11.61
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACTTotal
Female437
Male6612
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACTTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White8412
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported112
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DLPFC-rTMS + ACTSham-rTMS + ACTTotal
Hispanic or Latino202
Not Hispanic or Latino8917
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
    San Diego, California 92161-0002, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 18, 2024
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 25, 2025
  • Informed consent form · Apr 17, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A data repository will be created upon completion of the study. Data obtained in this study that has scientific value to other qualified researchers will made available upon request. Interested researches will be able to access de-identified data through a Data Use Agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05427201
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 22, 2022
Start date
May 22, 2023
Primary completion
May 30, 2025
Completion
May 30, 2025
Results posted
Jul 17, 2026
Last update
Jul 17, 2026

Study contacts

Matthew Herbert, PhD
principal investigator · VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion