ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05415553Updated Jul 29, 2022

IOBT Versus IO-Rec for Hypertropia With IOOA (IIHIOOA)

An interventional study of IOBT and IO-Rec in Hypertropia and Inferior Oblique Overaction, sponsored by Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 4 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-29.

Sponsored by Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multi-center, randomized double-blind controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of IOBT with IO-Rec for the treatment of hypertropia with IOOA.

Specific Aim 1 (Primary): To study the suboptimal surgical rates between IOBT and IO-Rec for the treatment of hypertropia with IOOA.

Specific Aim 2 (Secondary): To compare the surgical successful rate of IOBT with IO-Rec for the treatment of hypertropia with IOOA.

Read the detailed description

Using conventional surgical procedures, such as myectomy or recession of inferior oblique muscle, higher postoperative vertical overcorrection due to contralateral concealed IOOA were observed in mild primary position hypertropia with unilateral IOOA.

To achieve better outcome, IOBT was introduced. Yang et al. firstly reported that IOBT might be a useful alternative surgical treatment for patients with primary position hypertropia of less than 5△ that was associated with IOOA. Recently, our study has reported that IOBT achieved satisfactory outcomes in patients with mild primary position vertical deviation (≤10△) with unilateral IOOA, without any risk of overcorrection of vertical deviation and contralateral IOOA. Although our results are promising, there is no enough evidence to recommend IOBT for primary position hypertropia with inferior oblique overaction. A large randomized trial is needed to compare the surgical successful rate and suboptimal surgical outcomes of IOBT with IO-Rec for primary position hypertropia with inferior oblique overaction.

The proposed trial will be conducted in 9 different study sites working in the field of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. Each site will have one certified surgeon to do all surgeries. For IOBT, the whole belly of inferior oblique muscle is secured with a 6-0 absorbable suture, and then anchors to the sclera 5 mm behind the temporal insertion of the inferior rectus muscle. For IO-Rec, the insertion of inferior oblique muscle is excised and secured with a 6-0 absorbable suture, and then anchors to the sclera 4 mm behind and 2 mm beside the temporal insertion of the inferior rectus muscle.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertropia
  • Inferior Oblique Overaction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Inferior oblique muscle belly transposition
  • Inferior oblique muscle recession
  • Inferior oblique overaction
03

In context

Strabismus

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Strabismus; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 190 is above the median of 60 across 82 interventional studies indexed under Strabismus.

Browse Strabismus studies →

Lead sponsor

Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 4 years at the time of surgery;
  • Vertical deviation (VD) in primary position (5△ ≤ VD ≤ 10△)
  • IOOA for three following situations:

    1. IOOA +1 for the operative eye and IOOA - for the follow eye;
    2. IOOA +2 for the operative eye and IOOA ± for the follow eye;
    3. IOOA +2 for the operative eye and IOOA +1 for the follow eye;
  • Without amblyopia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Histories of strabismus surgery or botulinum toxin injection;
  • Histories of intraocular surgery or refractive surgery;
  • Restrictive or paralytic strabismus;
  • Ocular disease other than strabismus or refractive error;
  • Craniofacial malformations affecting the orbits;
  • Significant neurological disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
190 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IOBT group

    For IOBT, the whole belly of inferior oblique muscle is anchored to the sclera 5 mm behind the temporal insertion of the inferior rectus muscle.

    Procedure: IOBT

  • Active comparator
    IO-Rec group

    For IO-Rec, the insertion of inferior oblique muscle is excised and anchored to the sclera 4 mm behind and 2 mm beside the temporal insertion of the inferior rectus muscle.

    Procedure: IO-Rec

Interventions

  • ProcedureIOBT

    Surgery of inferior oblique muscle belly transposition for treatment of primary position hypertropia with inferior oblique overaction

  • ProcedureIO-Rec

    Surgery of inferior oblique muscle recession for treatment of primary position hypertropia with inferior oblique overaction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suboptimal surgical rate

    Suboptimal surgical cases/total cases. Suboptimal surgical outcomes include vertical undercorrection, vertical overcorrection and antielevation syndrome.

    Time frame: at 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Surgical successful rate

    Surgical successful cases/total cases. The successful criterion is without any vertical deviation in primary position at distance and without IOOA postoperatively.

    Time frame: at 12 month

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bahl RS, Marcotty A, Rychwalski PJ, Traboulsi EI. Comparison of inferior oblique myectomy to recession for the treatment of superior oblique palsy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;97(2):184-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301485. Epub 2012 Nov 30. PubMed 23203704 ↗
  • Alajbegovic-Halimic J, Zvizdic D, Sahbegovic-Holcner A, Kulanic-Kuduzovic A. Recession Vs Myotomy-Comparative Analysis of Two Surgical Procedures of Weakening Inferior Oblique Muscle Overaction. Med Arch. 2015 Jun;69(3):165-8. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.165-168. Epub 2015 Jun 10. PubMed 26261384 ↗
  • Nabie R, Raoufi S, Hassanpour E, Nikniaz L, Kharrazi B, Mamaghani S. Comparing graded anterior transposition with myectomy in primary inferior oblique overaction - A clinical trial. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 May 8;31(4):422-425. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.04.002. eCollection 2019 Dec. PubMed 31844794 ↗
  • Akbari MR, Sadrkhanlou S, Mirmohammadsadeghi A. Surgical Outcome of Single Inferior Oblique Myectomy in Small and Large Hypertropia of Unilateral Superior Oblique Palsy. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019 Jan 23;56(1):23-27. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20180925-03. Epub 2018 Oct 26. PubMed 30371917 ↗
  • Hendler K, Pineles SL, Demer JL, Rosenbaum AL, Velez G, Velez FG. Does inferior oblique recession cause overcorrections in laterally incomitant small hypertropias due to superior oblique palsy? Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan;97(1):88-91. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302006. Epub 2012 Nov 10. PubMed 23143910 ↗
  • Bhatta S, Auger G, Ung T, Burke J. Underacting inferior oblique muscle following myectomy or recession for unilateral inferior oblique overaction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012 Jan-Feb;49(1):43-8. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20110208-02. Epub 2011 Feb 15. PubMed 21323243 ↗
  • Yang S, Guo X, Tien DR. Inferior Oblique Belly Transposition for Small Angle Hypertropia With Inferior Oblique Overaction: A Pilot Study. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018 Jan 1;55(1):43-46. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20170801-04. Epub 2017 Oct 9. PubMed 28991348 ↗
  • Zhu W, Wang X, Jiang C, Ling L, Wu L, Zhao C. Effect of inferior oblique muscle belly transposition on versions and vertical alignment in primary position. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;259(11):3461-3468. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05240-x. Epub 2021 Jun 18. PubMed 34142185 ↗
  • Tomarchio S, Sabetti L, Tomarchio M, Berarducci A. New surgical intervention for the weakening of the inferior oblique muscle: equatorial scleral anchor. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Jan-Feb;52(1):58-60. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20141230-09. PubMed 25643372 ↗
  • Kasem M, Metwally H, El-Adawy IT, Abdelhameed AG. Retro-equatorial inferior oblique myopexy for treatment of inferior oblique overaction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;258(9):1991-1997. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04742-4. Epub 2020 May 27. PubMed 32462341 ↗
  • Shipman T, Burke J. Unilateral inferior oblique muscle myectomy and recession in the treatment of inferior oblique muscle overaction: a longitudinal study. Eye (Lond). 2003 Nov;17(9):1013-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700488. PubMed 14704751 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We concerns about patient privacy issues and it's better to protect the publication potential.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 35 months after the start.

Of 35 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Strabismus, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 35 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2022
First posted
Jun 13, 2022
StartActual
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 29, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05415553
Collaborators
Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Xiamen Eye Center of Xiamen University, Kunming Aier Eye Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 13, 2022
Start date
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2022

Study contacts

Chen Zhao
Contact
dr_zhaochen@163.com
+86-021-6437-7134
Wenqing Zhu
Contact

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion