ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05414695Updated Jun 10, 2022

Effect of Acupuncture on Craniomandibular Pain of Myofascial Origin.

An interventional study of real acupuncture and Placebo acupuncture in Myofascial Pain and Craniofacial Pain, sponsored by Universidad de la Republica. Status unknown at 1 site in Uruguay. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-10.

Sponsored by Universidad de la Republica · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2022), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Myofascial pain is one of the most prevalent conditions within temporomandibular disorders. Despite its high prevalence, health systems pay insufficient attention to it. Patients frequently receive multiple unnecessary and sometimes aggressive treatments. In this context, acupuncture has been studied as a plausible therapy for these conditions. However, researchers have encountered various methodological difficulties when demonstrating its actual effect. The main historical challenge in this area involves the difficulties inherent to using appropriate acupuncture controls such as placebos that allow for double blinding and cause minimum tactile stimulation.

In a previous study, a validated an improved novel placebo acupuncture non-penetrating device with double blinding capability was presented. This project will allow to test the performance of this new placebo acupuncture device in a clinical experimental setting. The study will try to determine the actual effectiveness of acupuncture in treating craniomandibular pain of myofascial origin. The design will be a randomized, triple blind, placebo controlled, crossover clinical trial. The protocol follows the STRICTA (Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture) recommendations, and ethical approval was obtained.

The central hypothesis is that acupuncture will be more effective than a placebo. Another hypothesis is that neither patients nor acupuncturists will be able to distinguish real acupuncture devices from placebo devices.

The study will include consecutive patients diagnosed with pain in the craniomandibular region of muscular/myofascial origin according to accepted criteria. Sample size calculations were made with the assumption of an 80% power and a statistical difference accepted at the 5% level. A total of 60 patients will be included.

Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: real acupuncture or placebo. Five sessions will be performed on each patient on a weekly basis. The total time for each intervention will be 30 minutes. A crossover design will be applied after a "washout" period of 14 days.

Outcome measures will include pain, stress levels, quality of life, and mandibular dynamics, using validated and published criteria. Baseline measurements will be taken pre-treatment and at each treatment session. Follow-up outcomes will be measured after three and six months.

A strict protocol for bias control will be followed. The triple-blind design will prevent the patient, the acupuncturist, and the person performing the statistical analysis from knowing what type of treatment each patient receives each time. Examiners will be calibrated and blinded to the treatment status.

Data will be analyzed using a generalized mixed model framework and logistic regression models. Also, Fisher's exact test will be used to analyze the devices' blinding capability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myofascial Pain
  • Craniofacial Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • acupuncture
  • myofascial pain
  • placebo
  • facial pain
03

In context

Facial Pain

182 studies on the registry are indexed under Facial Pain; 61 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 132 interventional studies indexed under Facial Pain.

Browse Facial Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de la Republica is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of miofascial pain in the craniomandibular/temporomandibular region (DC-TMD published criteria).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman
  • Recent history of facial trauma
  • Systemic diseases that can affect the musculoskeletal system (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, etc).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Real acupuncture

    The patient receives five sessions (weekly) of real acupuncture treatment in the acupuncture points LI4, S6, S7 and SI18. Each session lasts 30 minutes.

    Device: real acupuncture

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo acupuncture

    The patient receives five sessions (weekly) of placebo acupuncture in the same acupuncture points LI4, S6, S7 and SI18. Each session lasts 30 minutes. The placebo and real acupuncture devices have the same visual features but in the placebo device the needle does not even touch the skin.

    Device: Placebo acupuncture

Interventions

  • Devicereal acupuncture

    Device with acupuncture needles 25 × 0.22 mm, Cloud \& Dragon Medical Device Co, Ltd, China. Needle penetrates the skin 4 mm

  • DevicePlacebo acupuncture

    Device with acupuncture needles 25 × 0.22 mm, Cloud \& Dragon Medical Device Co, Ltd, China. Needle does not touch the skin.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity change from baseline to follow-up.

    A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which consists of a 100mm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 100 ('worst pain').

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Graded Chronic Pain Scale Version 2.0

    Validated instrument for assessment of chronic pain in epidemiological and health services research

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. Muscle pain upon palpation.

    Performed by calibrated and blind researchers following the DC-TMD criteria (www.rdc-tmdinternational.org/)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  3. Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale

    The stress VAS consisted of a 100mm line, with two end points representing 0 ('none') and 100 ('as bad as it could be').

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universidad de la República, School of Dentistry
    Montevideo, 11400, Uruguay
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, List T, Svensson P, Gonzalez Y, Lobbezoo F, Michelotti A, Brooks SL, Ceusters W, Drangsholt M, Ettlin D, Gaul C, Goldberg LJ, Haythornthwaite JA, Hollender L, Jensen R, John MT, De Laat A, de Leeuw R, Maixner W, van der Meulen M, Murray GM, Nixdorf DR, Palla S, Petersson A, Pionchon P, Smith B, Visscher CM, Zakrzewska J, Dworkin SF; International RDC/TMD Consortium Network, International association for Dental Research; Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group, International Association for the Study of Pain. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Groupdagger. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014 Winter;28(1):6-27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151. PubMed 24482784 ↗
  • Lesage FX, Berjot S, Deschamps F. Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;62(8):600-5. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqs140. Epub 2012 Sep 10. PubMed 22965867 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD that underlie results in a publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Starting one month after publication and for one year.

Access criteria: IPD and any additional supporting information will be shared to researchers worldwide upon direct request to the Principal Investigator (Marcelo Kreiner).

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2022, 7 months after the start.

Of 53 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Facial Pain, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 57 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 2, 2022
First posted
Jun 10, 2022
StartActual
Mar 14, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 2022
Last update
Jun 10, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05414695
Lead sponsor
Universidad de la Republica
Responsible party
Marcelo Kreiner (Professor and Chair, Oral Physiology, Universidad de la Republica) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 10, 2022
Start date
Mar 14, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2022

Study contacts

Marcelo Kreiner, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad de la Republica

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion