ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05413616FITFOODUpdated Jul 24, 2025

The Effect of a Combined Personalized Nutritional Intervention and a Personalized Graded Activity Functional Training Program on Physical Performance in Hospitalized Older Patients, Compared to Usual Care

An interventional study of FITFOOD lifestyle intervention in Old Age; Atrophy, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Primary conditionAtrophy(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Atrophy is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project aims to improve physical performance in older patients, by offering a personalized combined nutritional intervention with a physical activity training program. The intervention starts at hospital admittance and is continued after discharge in the home care setting, supported by an e-health application.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: The older hospitalized population is growing and specifically at risk for decreased muscle mass and physical functioning and has a negative influence on activities of daily living, independence, quality of life, re-admissions, and nursing home placement. Current knowledge shows that a physical activity training programs consisting of tailored resistance and endurance exercise can improve muscle mass in healthy elderly. Nutritional interventions in conjunction with physical activity based on individual protein requirements, high quality protein and timing of protein intake can further stimulate muscle protein synthesis. The effect of a combined nutritional intervention with physical activity in healthy individuals and athletes has been studied before, but not in older hospitalized patients. A personalized combined physical activity program and a nutritional intervention could be a solution and is an exciting emerging field of research with the potential to dramatically improve patient outcomes.

The average hospital admittance is 4 to 5 days in which the prevention of the decline in muscle mass and physical performance can be initiated but not improved. Thus, the translation of a prolonged combined intervention to home care is essential. To support the combined personalized nutritional intervention and physical exercise intervention during hospitalization and home care, an eHealth application for and with older patients can be beneficial.

Objective: This project aims to improve physical performance in older patients, by offering a personalized combined nutritional intervention with a physical activity training program. The intervention starts at hospital admittance, and is continued after discharge in the home care setting, supported by an e-health application.

Study design: The study will be performed as a randomized clinical trial. Study population: The study population hospitalized adult patients of ≥65 years, living in the Nijmegen area within the Radboud University Medical Centre.

Intervention: One group receives a personalized nutritional intervention by a dietician combines with a functional training program by physical therapists. The nutritional intervention focuses on adequate protein intake, type, and timing of protein. The exercise program will make use of goal setting throughout the intervention period to optimize the training effect . The control group will receive usual care.

Study parameters: The primary study outcome is based on the difference in change in physical performance between baseline and after 3 months of intervention of the intervention and the control group (usual care). This will be analyzed using multilevel mixed model corrected by potential confounders, measured by the Timed up \& Go test (TUG), a sensitive tool to measure physical performance in elderly.

Secondary: As a secondary outcome, the effect on short physical performance battery, muscle strength, muscle mass, nutritional status, movement, independence, quality of life, clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be studied.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit, and group relatedness: Study measurements are non-invasive. This study will not confer any no additional risks. The intervention will start at hospital admittance and will be continued after discharge in the home setting by a dietician and physiotherapist in their nearby home, which keeps the burden for the patient relatively low and is an extra service for the patient. Protein supplementation will be delivered within the save amounts. Possible serious reactions to the intervention will be noted as SAE's.

02

Conditions studied

  • Old Age; Atrophy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • nutrition
  • protein
  • exercise
  • sarcopenia
  • older people
  • vitamin D
03

In context

Atrophy Unverified

125 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrophy; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 136 is above the median of 36 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Atrophy.

Browse Atrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Compared within Atrophy, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥65 years
  • Living within the Nijmegen area (within 40km)
  • Admitted to clinical ward of Radboudumc or CWZ
  • Understanding and speaking of the Dutch language
  • Mentally competent
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complete use of tube feeding or parenteral nutrition
  • Renal insufficiency (-GFR \< 30ml/min)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
136 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard care
  • Experimental
    FITFOOD lifestyle intervention

    Lifestyle intervention consisting of both a nutritional and exercise intervention.

    Behavioral: FITFOOD lifestyle intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralFITFOOD lifestyle intervention

    Lifestyle intervention with a nutritional and exercise component.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Timed Up & Go

    TUG

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 4 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Short Physical Performance Battery

    Short Physical Performance Battery (scale: 0-12, a high score indicates no disability, a low score means disabilities may be present or developing).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 4 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  2. Change in muscle strength

    Handgrip strength

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  3. Change in muscle mass

    BIA

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  4. Change in nutritional status

    Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Scale: 0-49 (low score: no intervention needed. Score\>9: serious indication for intervention)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 4 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  5. Change in nutritional intake (energy, protein).

    Food diary.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 4 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  6. Change in movement according to actometer

    Activ8 measurement will assess movement during 1 week for each measurement point

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  7. Change in activities of daily living

    LLFDI-CAT (Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument Computer Adaptive Test). LLFDI-CAT scores are transformed to a scale with mean = 50 and standard deviation =10. Lower scores correspond to more limitation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  8. Change in quality of life

    EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5-level five-dimensional questionnaire). Scores 1-5 where 1 is good and 5 indicates issues or problems.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

  9. Clinical outcomes: length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 24 weeks after baseline

  10. Clinical outcomes: re-admission

    Re-admission

    Time frame: 24 weeks after baseline

  11. Clinical outcomes: complications

    Complications

    Time frame: 24 weeks after baseline

  12. Clinical outcomes: mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: 24 weeks after baseline

  13. Medical consumption

    iMCQ: iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire. Medical consumption will be measured using iMCQ and costs are calculated using Dutch reference values.

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Medical consumption

    iMCQ: iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire. Medical consumption will be measured using iMCQ and costs are calculated using Dutch reference values.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline

  15. Risk for Sarcopenia

    SARC-F: Strength, Assistance with walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs (scored 0-1-, higher score means higher risk for sarcopenia) and Falls

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 day before hospital release, 4 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, 24 weeks after baseline.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van Exter SH, Koenders N, van der Wees PJ, Drenth JPH, van den Berg MGA. Lessons learned from a combined, personalized lifestyle intervention in hospitalized patients at risk for sarcopenia: a feasibility study. Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jul;47(14):3679-3686. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2426685. Epub 2024 Nov 12. PubMed 39530465 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 51 months after the start.

Of 43 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Atrophy, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 51 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 49 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 19, 2022
First posted
Jun 10, 2022
StartActual
Jul 4, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
Last update
Jul 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05413616
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2022
Start date
Jul 4, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion