ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05401682Updated Aug 8, 2022

Prospective Study of Post Surgical Continued Spinal Pain Patients

An observational study in Low Back Pain, Cervical Pain and Neck Disorder, sponsored by Keiser University College of Chiropractic Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-08.

Sponsored by Keiser University College of Chiropractic Medicine · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
61
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Continued spinal pain following spine surgery is reported in up to 50% of patients. Disability and pain following spine surgery occurs. Repeat back surgery outcomes on Workers Compensation low back patients demonstrated larger number of patients did not come back to work. Such continued pain has biopsychosocial health relationships between the physical and the psychological and social factors that are associated with back pain and disability. Chiropractic consultation by post surgical continued pain (PSCP) patients occurs but the frequency, clinical treatment and outcomes of chiropractic treatment are not sufficiently documented. Conditions reported in continued pscp patients seeking care following spinal fusion are reported as sacroiliac joint pain, internal disc disruption, and zygapohyseal joint pain. Sacroiliac joint pain is more common after fusion, while internal disc disruption is more common in nonfusion patients. Very few studies are available on the outcomes of PSCP patients seen by chiropractic. This study proposes to investigate the clinical outcomes of PSCP patients presenting with pain in lumbar, thoracic, and cervical regions and had prior surgery in the respective regions, seeking care from field Doctors of Chiropractic (DCs) certified in Cox flexion distraction decompression procedures.

Read the detailed description

Continued spinal pain following spine surgery is reported in up to 50% of patients. Disability and pain following spine surgery occurs. Repeat back surgery outcomes on Workers Compensation low back patients demonstrated larger number of patients did not come back to work. Such continued pain has biopsychosocial health relationships between the physical and the psychological and social factors that are associated with back pain and disability. Chiropractic consultation by post surgical continued pain (PSCP) patients occurs but the frequency, clinical treatment and outcomes of chiropractic treatment are not sufficiently documented. Conditions reported in continued pscp patients seeking care following spinal fusion are reported as sacroiliac joint pain, internal disc disruption, and zygapohyseal joint pain. Sacroiliac joint pain is more common after fusion, while internal disc disruption is more common in nonfusion patients. Very few studies are available on the outcomes of PSCP patients seen by chiropractic. This study proposes to investigate the clinical outcomes of PSCP patients presenting with pain in lumbar, thoracic, and cervical regions and had prior surgery in the respective regions, seeking care from field Doctors of Chiropractic (DCs) certified in Cox flexion distraction decompression procedures.

Research questions:

The specific aims of the study are:

Specific Aim 1: Descriptively document the subjective clinical outcomes (at visit one, at 3 months and at 12 months following intervention) regarding pain (using the VAS pain scale) and disability outcomes (using Roland Morris, Neck Disability Index, and PROMIS 29 questionnaires). Descriptively document the objective clinical outcome response (using a proforma exam form). This data will be collected regarding all patients who had undergone surgery to the lumbar, thoracic and/or cervical spines and choose to undergo care in the regions they had surgery with a Cox Certified Flexion-distraction decompression (FDD) practitioner. We expect to include 50 DCs and approximately 500 patients (an average of 10 patients per DC). Specific Aim 2: Descriptively document the treatment received during visits over a maximum of 3-month intervention. Determine the intervention details used by licensed Doctors of Chiropractic (DC) who are certified FDD and providing care to PSCP patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain
  • Cervical Pain
  • Neck Disorder
  • Low Back Disorder
  • Spine Injury

Keywords

  • back pain
  • neck pain
  • chiropractic
  • spine surgery
  • spine function
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,922 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is below the median of 100 across 481 observational studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Keiser University College of Chiropractic Medicine is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who had a prior surgery to the spine and reporting to chiropractic care for spinal pain

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 21 years and older.
  • Have neck pain and associated radiating symptoms,thoracic pain, back pain and/or associated radiating symptoms and have undergone at least one spine surgery in the respective regions.
  • Willing to undergo FDD chiropractic care in the painful regions of the spine.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic arthropathies or other co-morbid conditions that may require care outside study and may affect ability to deliver study treatments or interfere with study ssessments;
  • Inability to read or verbally comprehend English;
  • Intention to move from the area during the next 3 months
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherCox chiropractic care

    Manual distraction of spine in a prone position using specially assisted table

    Also known as: Flexion-distraction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in PROMISE 29 scores from initial visit to 3 months of treatment

    Functional outcome of daily activities

    Time frame: baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in PROMISE 29 scores from initial visit to 12 months with 3 months of treatment

    Functional outcome of daily activities

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  2. change in NDI scores from initial visit to 3 months of treatment

    Functional outcome of daily activities

    Time frame: baseline to 3 months

  3. change in NDI scores from initial visit to 12 months with 3 months of treatment

    Functional outcome of daily activities

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Keiser University
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33411, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Any request for data will be shared according to University protocols

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2019 to primary completion in Nov 2020, 21 months.

Of 175 non-industry observational studies under Low Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48. This study's 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 185 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 28, 2022
First posted
Jun 2, 2022
StartActual
Feb 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Nov 23, 2020
CompletionActual
Nov 23, 2020
Last update
Aug 8, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05401682
Lead sponsor
Keiser University College of Chiropractic Medicine
Responsible party
Maruti Gudavalli (Professor, Keiser University College of Chiropractic Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 2, 2022
Start date
Feb 1, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 23, 2020
Completion
Nov 23, 2020
Last update
Aug 8, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion