CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05382039Updated May 21, 2024Results posted

Effects of Electrotherapy on Pain, Anxiety, Motion and Disability in Adults With Neck or Upper Body Pain.

An interventional study of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain, sponsored by Loma Linda University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by Loma Linda University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial with sixty adults, 20 to 40 years of age. There will be three groups as follows: the normal group, control group, and intervention group where subjects will receive instructions for home use of TENS for pain reduction. The aim is for an equal distribution of males and females in each group.

Read the detailed description

This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial with sixty adults, 20 to 40 years of age. There will be three groups as follows: twenty subjects with no pain in the normal group; forty subjects with chronic subclinical neck or upper quadrant pain will be randomized into two groups: twenty subjects in the control group, and twenty subjects in the intervention group. The aim is for an equal distribution of males and females in each group.

Data will be collected for each subject using the NORAXON® myoMOTION™ System, the visual analog scale (VAS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Neck Disability Index (NDI); all assessments will be made by a clinician.

Normal group (20 subjects): Initial assessment on day one and post assessments on day eight and on day thirty. Control group (20 subjects): Initial assessment on day one and post assessments on day eight and on day thirty. Intervention group (20 subjects): Initial assessment on day one pre-intervention and post-intervention assessment of high-frequency sensory TENS (gate control theory of pain) for thirty minutes followed by post-assessments in day eight and day thirty.

The intervention group will receive a thirty-minute high frequency TENS (gate control theory of pain) once a day for seven days and twenty-one days after the initial seven days to measure immediate and short-term effects on the dependent variables further described below. Subjects will be educated on TENS usage by a licensed physical therapist. A daily log will be given to all subjects in the intervention group to assure compliance with treatment. In addition, the TENS device will keep track of date, time and day of usage, and TENS parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neck, upper quadrant, upper body, chronic pain, sub-clinical pain, mild pain
03

In context

Chronic Pain

2,930 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Pain; 701 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 60 across 2,161 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Pain.

Browse Chronic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Loma Linda University is the lead sponsor of 297 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for Subjects without Pain Group:

  • > 19 and \<41 years of age
  • Currently enrolled as students at Loma Linda University.
  • No pain

Exclusion Criteria for Control Group:

  • Neck and/or upper quadrant pain
  • \<20 years or >40 years of age

Inclusion Criteria for Subjects with Pain Groups:

  • >19 and \<41 years of age
  • Currently enrolled as students at Loma Linda University
  • No acute pain
  • With neck and/or upper quadrant chronic pain
  • With \<5/10 pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Exclusion Criteria for Subjects with Pain Groups:

  • \<20 years or >40 years of age
  • Acute pain
  • With >5/10 pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Currently receiving clinical pain treatment
  • Pain medications within six hours of data collection
  • Contraindications for the use of electrotherapy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Subjects without Pain

    This group will include twenty participants with no neck and/or upper quadrant pain that will not receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment.

  • No intervention
    Subjects with Pain and No Intervention

    This group will include twenty participants with neck and/or upper quadrant pain that will not receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment.

  • Experimental
    Subjects with Pain and Intervention

    This group will include twenty participants with neck and/or upper quadrant pain that will receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment.

    Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

    High frequency sensory transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Decrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain

    Assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which is a subjective measure of pain intensity consisting of a 10 centimeter (cm) line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and extreme pain on the right. Pain scores will be determined by measuring the distance in cm from "no pain" or 0 cm to the participant's anchor point.

    Time frame: Change between baseline and two weeks from time of enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck Proprioception

    Measurements assessed with NORAXON® myoMOTION™ System that is a composite measurement through an instrument that utilizes inertial measurement units (IMUs) to measure angles of motion in joints via sensors place on the head and neck. This system will measure cervical spine proprioception utilizing the joint position error (JPE) test by indicating the ability of a blindfolded subject to accurately reposition their head back to a predetermined neutral point after head movement.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Level of Anxiety

    Assessed with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-form Y (STAI) which is a definitive clinical composite measure of state and trait anxiety in adults. Form Y has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety which will indicate how the subject feels "right now"/"at this moment" and how the subject "generally feels." All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always") for a potential total of 80 points. A score of zero points represents no anxiety. A score of 80 points represents severe anxiety.

    Time frame: Change between baseline and two weeks post-enrollment

07

Results

Posted May 21, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSubjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and Intervention
Started211212
Completed161210
Not completed502
Withdrew: Score on pain scale was not zero. subjects randomized to this arm had to have zero pain.500
Withdrew: One subject unable to return for reassessment as required by protocol timeline.001
Withdrew: Waiting for confirmation001

Outcome measures

PrimaryDecrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain

Assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which is a subjective measure of pain intensity consisting of a 10 centimeter (cm) line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and extreme pain on the right. Pain scores will be determined by measuring the distance in cm from "no pain" or 0 cm to the participant's anchor point.

Time frame:
Change between baseline and two weeks from time of enrollment
Reported as:
Median · cm
Decrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain
cmSubjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and Intervention
Decrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain0 (0 to 0)2.0 (0.1 to 3.8)2.0 (0.1 to 3.8)
SecondaryNeck Proprioception

Measurements assessed with NORAXON® myoMOTION™ System that is a composite measurement through an instrument that utilizes inertial measurement units (IMUs) to measure angles of motion in joints via sensors place on the head and neck. This system will measure cervical spine proprioception utilizing the joint position error (JPE) test by indicating the ability of a blindfolded subject to accurately reposition their head back to a predetermined neutral point after head movement.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Neck Proprioception
degreesSubjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and Intervention
Neck Proprioception4.2 ± 2.34.7 ± 4.24.7 ± 4.2
SecondaryLevel of Anxiety

Assessed with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-form Y (STAI) which is a definitive clinical composite measure of state and trait anxiety in adults. Form Y has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety which will indicate how the subject feels "right now"/"at this moment" and how the subject "generally feels." All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always") for a potential total of 80 points. A score of zero points represents no anxiety. A score of 80 points represents severe anxiety.

Time frame:
Change between baseline and two weeks post-enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Level of Anxiety
score on a scaleSubjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and Intervention
Level of Anxiety13.5 ± 4.818.0 ± 7.018.0 ± 7.0

Adverse events

Collected over 2 weeks post enrollment. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Subjects Without Pain0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)
Subjects With Pain and No Intervention0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Subjects With Pain and Intervention0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Unable to analyze 7 subjects due to: * 1 subject (pain and intervention) unable to return after two weeks for reassessment. * 1 subject (pain and intervention) unable to complete data collection due to a pain score VAS \>4/10. * 1 subject (no pain) unable to complete data due to lightheadedness. * 4 subjects (no pain) excluded due to a pain score \>0/10.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Subjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and InterventionTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years16121038
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Subjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and InterventionTotal
Female1211528
Male41510
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Subjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and InterventionTotal
Count of participants———0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Subjects Without PainSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and InterventionTotal
United States16121038
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Loma Linda University Health
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 29, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 29, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05382039
Lead sponsor
Loma Linda University
Responsible party
Eric Johnson (Associate Director, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program & Director, Neuroscience Research Laboratory, Loma Linda University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2022
Start date
Feb 3, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 17, 2023
Completion
Mar 17, 2023
Results posted
May 21, 2024
Last update
May 21, 2024

Study contacts

Eric Johnson, DSc
principal investigator · Loma Linda University Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion