An observational study in Database for Intrauterine Adhesion, Risk Factors for Intrauterine Adhesion and Risk Stratification and Prognostic Assessment, sponsored by Hua Duan. Status unknown at 2 sites in China. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-31.
Sponsored by Hua Duan · Observational
241 studies on the registry are indexed under Tissue Adhesions; 29 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 2,200 is above the median of 146 across 49 observational studies indexed under Tissue Adhesions.
Browse Tissue Adhesions studies →This is the only study on the registry with Hua Duan as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Taking α=0.05 and β=0.1, the overall time incidence (pregnancy rate) was taken as the lowest value of P=0.25, the risk factor (uterine adhesion fraction) coefficient was -0.18, and the decision coefficient for the risk factor (uterine adhesion fraction) was 0.8. The PASS software calculated 1622, taking into account the shedding factor (20%) and the randomization requirement of n=2028, based on each center's outpatient volume, the total number of cases to be included in this study database is at least 2200.
Exclusion Criteria:
Hysteroscopy for CSGE, AFS, and endometrial receptivity assessment
Ultrasonography for Uterus size and endometrial thickness
Rate of pregnancy
Time frame: 2 years
Recurrence rate of IUA
Recurrence rate of Intrauterine Adhesion
Time frame: 3 month
Menstrual blood volume
Time frame: 3 month
CSGE
CSGE (Chinese Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy score), scale 0-28, higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 3 month
AFS
AFS(American Fertility Association score), scale 1-12, higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time frame: 3 month
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.