ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05380180Updated May 19, 2026Results posted

Enhancing Quality of Life for Older Adults With and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Through Social Engagement Over Video Technology

An interventional study of OneClick Social Engagement Intervention and OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Extension in Aging, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Aging Well, sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 1,418 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in United States — 328 open to participants now, 432 under way, 13 of them phase 3. Cognitive Dysfunction · United States.

Enrollment
377th of 1,143
99 · median 58
Started
2022
with 106 others
No phase
713 of 1,418
181 open now
Registered
970th of 1,418
by date

Among the 1,418 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in United States, this one is the 377th largest by enrollment of the 1,143 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 107 that started in 2022, is one of 713 with no phase, and was the 970th registered.

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,119 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is above the median of 64 across 2,794 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Open to participants now

328 of the 1,418 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in United States are open now, in 12 countries. Each count lists the studies.

All 328 open studies →

Who these studies take

Of the 750 Cognitive Dysfunction studies recruiting now, 362 (48%) set no upper age limit and 143 (19%) stop at 75 or younger; 46 take children under 18; 259 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 65 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 1,418 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to rigorously assess the efficacy of an 8-week social engagement OneClick intervention. A total of 120 older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (60 per group) will be randomized after a baseline assessment to the social engagement OneClick intervention group or the waitlist control group. Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive the social engagement OneClick intervention for 8 weeks, and will complete a mid-assessment at week 4, and a post-assessment at week 8. Participants assigned to the waitlist control group will receive no intervention for the first 8 weeks and will complete assessments at week 4 and week 8. Subsequently, as an extension to this study, participants assigned to the waitlist control group will have an opportunity to participate in 8 weeks of social engagement OneClick intervention.

03

Conditions studied

  • Aging
  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Aging Well

Keywords

  • videoconferencing
  • social engagement
  • loneliness
  • social isolation
  • quality of life
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65+
  • Fluent in English
  • Adequate visual and auditory acuity
  • Passing score on Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status - Modified (TICS-M) of 22 and above included
  • Passing score on (MoCA) of 20 and above included
  • Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score of less than 9
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Access to and ability to use necessary resources for participating in technology-based intervention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dementia
  • Live in assisted living facility or skilled nursing facility
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group

    Intervention group participants will receive the social engagement OneClick intervention for 8 weeks, and will complete a mid-assessment at week 4, and a post-assessment at week 8.

    Other: OneClick Social Engagement Intervention

  • Other
    OneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group

    Waitlist control group participants will receive no intervention for the first 8 weeks and will complete assessments at week 4 and week 8. Following the completion of the 8-week controlled portion, waitlist participants will be provided with the opportunity to participate in the OneClick social engagement intervention through the intervention extension.

    Other: OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Extension

Interventions

  • OtherOneClick Social Engagement Intervention

    Intervention group participants will receive the social engagement OneClick intervention for 8 weeks, and will complete a mid-assessment at week 4, and a post-assessment at week 8. Participants will use a computer or tablet to participate in two social engagement events per week. The intervention events will be delivered through the OneClick video conferencing platform. During each session participants will watch a short slideshow around a series of topics (e.g., nature, technology, hobbies) and get to engage in conversations surround the topics presented, which will be held in breakout rooms. Breakout room discussions will be set for 30 minutes, and participants will be provided with questions surrounding the topics to help stimulate conversation.

  • OtherOneClick Social Engagement Intervention Extension

    Waitlist control group participants will receive no intervention for the first 8 weeks and will complete assessments at week 4 and week 8. Following the completion of the 8-week controlled portion, waitlist participants will be provided with the opportunity to participate in the OneClick social engagement intervention through the intervention extension. Waitlist participants will use a computer or tablet to participate in two social engagement events per week. The intervention events will be delivered through the OneClick video conferencing platform over the span of 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale

    Measures six dimensions that contribute to social isolation. Lower scores indicate lower extent of social isolation. Range (0-24)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  2. Change in Loneliness Measured by University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

    Measures the respondents' subjective feeling of loneliness. Higher scores indicate a greater feeling of loneliness. Range (20-80).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  3. Change in Quality of Life Measured by Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease

    Measures quality of life indicators such as physical health, energy, family, and money. Lower scores indicate a lower quality of life. Range (13-52).

    Time frame: Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Social Network Measured by Lubben Social Network Index

    Measures social network size for both family and friends and also the frequency of interaction with them. Higher scores indicate higher level of social engagement. Range (0-30).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

  2. Change in Social Activity Measured by Social Activity Frequency

    Measures how often during the past year participants have engaged in various social activities. Lower scores indicate less engagement in social activities. Range (10-50).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

Other outcomes

  1. Change in System Usability Measured by System Usability Scale

    Measures the respondents' perception of usability of the OneClick system. Higher scores indicate higher ease of use and usefulness, and lower scores indicate more difficulty to use the system and decreased usefulness. Range (0-100).

    Time frame: Week 4 of intervention, Week 8 of intervention

  2. Change in Technology Acceptance Measured by Technology Acceptance Survey

    Measure of technology acceptance: perceived ease of use. Lower scores indicate lower perception of ease of use. Range (1-7).

    Time frame: Week 4 of intervention, Week 8 of intervention

  3. Change in Computer Proficiency Measure by Computer Proficiency Questionnaire (Short -Form)

    Measures the ability to perform a number of tasks using a computer. Tasks include computer basics, printing, communication, internet, scheduling, and multimedia. Higher scores indicated higher rates of proficiency. Range (6-30).

    Time frame: Week 4 of intervention, Week 8 of intervention

07

Results

Posted Jan 16, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group
Started5049
Completed4146
Not completed93

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale

Measures six dimensions that contribute to social isolation. Lower scores indicate lower extent of social isolation. Range (0-24)

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Social Isolation Measured by Friendship Scale
score on a scaleOneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group
Baseline20.37 ± 3.2620.54 ± 3.30
Week 420.05 ± 3.3120.23 ± 3.35
Week 820.39 ± 3.0519.54 ± 4.34
Statistical analysis
  • OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group vs OneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05
PrimaryChange in Loneliness Measured by University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale

Measures the respondents' subjective feeling of loneliness. Higher scores indicate a greater feeling of loneliness. Range (20-80).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Loneliness Measured by University of California - Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale
score on a scaleOneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group
Baseline37.93 ± 8.9437.08 ± 9.35
Week 440.34 ± 8.8838.60 ± 9.35
Week 838.05 ± 8.9239.00 ± 9.62
Statistical analysis
  • OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group vs OneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05
PrimaryChange in Quality of Life Measured by Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease

Measures quality of life indicators such as physical health, energy, family, and money. Lower scores indicate a lower quality of life. Range (13-52).

Time frame:
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Measured by Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease
score on a scaleOneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group
Baseline37.52 ± 5.2137.81 ± 5.11
Week 436.88 ± 5.5636.63 ± 5.52
Week 837.44 ± 5.4836.54 ± 5.57
Statistical analysis
  • OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group vs OneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05
SecondaryChange in Social Network Measured by Lubben Social Network Index

Measures social network size for both family and friends and also the frequency of interaction with them. Higher scores indicate higher level of social engagement. Range (0-30).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Social Network Measured by Lubben Social Network Index
score on a scaleOneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group
Baseline18.75 ± 4.4319.08 ± 4.55
Week 417.59 ± 5.5017.28 ± 4.90
Week 817.51 ± 4.5017.54 ± 4.74
Statistical analysis
  • OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group vs OneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05
SecondaryChange in Social Activity Measured by Social Activity Frequency

Measures how often during the past year participants have engaged in various social activities. Lower scores indicate less engagement in social activities. Range (10-50).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Social Activity Measured by Social Activity Frequency
score on a scaleOneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group
Baseline26.84 ± 4.0127.98 ± 3.98
Week 427.63 ± 4.0827.89 ± 5.05
Week 828.07 ± 4.6927.30 ± 4.44
Statistical analysis
  • OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group vs OneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <.05
Other pre-specifiedChange in System Usability Measured by System Usability Scale

Measures the respondents' perception of usability of the OneClick system. Higher scores indicate higher ease of use and usefulness, and lower scores indicate more difficulty to use the system and decreased usefulness. Range (0-100).

Time frame:
Week 4 of intervention, Week 8 of intervention
Reported as:
Mean · Raw Score
Change in System Usability Measured by System Usability Scale
Raw ScoreOneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group
Change Score at Week 463.80 ± 18.7
Change Score at Week 868.20 ± 18.6
Other pre-specifiedChange in Technology Acceptance Measured by Technology Acceptance Survey

Measure of technology acceptance: perceived ease of use. Lower scores indicate lower perception of ease of use. Range (1-7).

Time frame:
Week 4 of intervention, Week 8 of intervention
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Technology Acceptance Measured by Technology Acceptance Survey
score on a scaleOneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group
Change Score at Week 45.40 ± 1.4
Change Score at Week 85.70 ± 1.2
Other pre-specifiedChange in Computer Proficiency Measure by Computer Proficiency Questionnaire (Short -Form)

Measures the ability to perform a number of tasks using a computer. Tasks include computer basics, printing, communication, internet, scheduling, and multimedia. Higher scores indicated higher rates of proficiency. Range (6-30).

Time frame:
Week 4 of intervention, Week 8 of intervention
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Computer Proficiency Measure by Computer Proficiency Questionnaire (Short -Form)
score on a scaleOneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group
Change Score at Week 427.60 ± 2.8
Change Score at Week 828.10 ± 2.6

Adverse events

Collected over up to 16 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OneClick Social Engagement Intervention Group0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
OneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control Group0/49 (0%)0/49 (0%)0/49 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)OneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control GroupTotal
Mean73.5 ± 6.374.6 ± 7.174.05 ± 6.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control GroupTotal
Female384381
Male12618
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)OneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American257
White464086
More than one race145
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)OneClick Social Engagement Intervention GroupOneClick Social Engagement Waitlist Control GroupTotal
United States504999
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign
    Champaign, Illinois 61821, United States
  • CJE Senior Living
    Chicago, Illinois 60645, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mois G, Lydon EA, Mathias VF, Jones SE, Mudar RA, Rogers WA. Best practices for implementing a technology-based intervention protocol: Participant and researcher considerations. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Jul;122:105373. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105373. Epub 2024 Feb 19. PubMed 38460265 ↗
  • Lydon EA, Mois G, Shende SA, Myers D, Danilovich MK, Rogers WA, Mudar RA. Methods and baseline characteristics for a social engagement technology-based randomized controlled trial for older adults. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 May 13;39:101308. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101308. eCollection 2024 Jun. PubMed 38841566 ↗
  • Mois G, Lydon EA, Danilovich MK, Myers D, Chen XS, Mudar RA, Rogers WA. A social engagement technology-based randomized controlled trial for older adults: Outcomes and lessons learned. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jul 28;47:101529. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101529. eCollection 2025 Oct. PubMed 40822701 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 11 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2026, 2 years 9 months after primary completion.

Of 1,442 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cognitive Dysfunction, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 51. This study's 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,511 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 12, 2022
First posted
May 18, 2022
StartActual
Apr 15, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 6, 2023
CompletionActual
Jun 6, 2023
Results first posted
Jan 16, 2026
Last update
May 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05380180
Responsible party
Wendy Rogers (Khan Professor of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2022
Start date
Apr 15, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 6, 2023
Completion
Jun 6, 2023
Results posted
Jan 16, 2026
Last update
May 19, 2026

Study contacts

Wendy A Rogers, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion