ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05369169Updated Apr 20, 2026

Afferent Neurocardiac Signals, Cue Reactivity, and Cognitive Control

An interventional study of Resonance breathing and Low demand cognitive task in Binge Drinking, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-20.

Sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Conscious attempts to regulate alcohol use are often undermined by automatic attention and arousal processes activated by alcohol cues, as well as by diminished ability to inhibit in-the-moment behaviors. The current study will examine whether a brief behavioral intervention of slow breathing paced at a resonance frequency of the cardiovascular system can interrupt automatic alcohol cue reactivity and enhance cognitive control in binge drinkers. Results from the proposed study may provide new prevention and intervention targets to interrupt unhealthy drinking behaviors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Binge Drinking

Keywords

  • Alcohol Consumption
  • Baroreflex
  • Arousal
  • Breathing
  • Cardiovascular System
  • Cognition
  • Electrophysiology
  • Event-Related Potentials
  • Heavy Drinking
  • Attention
  • Individual Differences
  • Alcohol Cue
  • Brief Intervention
  • Cognitive Control
  • Cue Reactivity
  • Drinking Behavior
  • Young Adult
  • Heart Rate Variability
03

In context

Binge Drinking

71 studies on the registry are indexed under Binge Drinking; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 120 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Binge Drinking.

Browse Binge Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 131 are open to participants now.

Of its 39 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 31 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must report at least 2 binge drinking episodes in the past month
  • Have normal or corrected-to-normal vision

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or presence of serious psychiatric disorders, neurological disorders, or head injury resulting in a loss of consciousness
  • Presence of any serious medical condition
  • Report of more than a few occasions (3-4) of illicit drug use, except for cannabis, in the preceding year
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Resonance paced breathing

    Active resonance breathing task consisting of synchronizing breathing with a visual pacer (E-Z Air, Thought Technology, Ltd., Plattsburgh, NY) that moves up (inhale) and down (exhale) at the rate of 0.1 Hz (6 breaths per min)

    Behavioral: Resonance breathing

  • Active comparator
    Low demand vanilla control

    A low-demand cognitive "vanilla" task wherein different colored rectangles are presented for 10 sec each, and participants are instructed to silently count the number of blue rectangles

    Behavioral: Low demand cognitive task

Interventions

  • BehavioralResonance breathing

    Participants will synchronize their breathing with a visual pacer (E-Z Air, Thought Technology, Ltd., Plattsburgh, NY) that moves up (inhale) and down (exhale) at the rate of 0.1 Hz (6 breaths per min)

  • BehavioralLow demand cognitive task

    Different colored rectangles are presented for 10 sec each, and participants are instructed to silently count the number of blue rectangles

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. N2 ERP amplitude (in microvolts) elicited from an Alcohol Cued Go/No-Go task

    The N2 component (in microvolts) of the event-related potential occurring 250-350 ms after stimulus presentation at frontal and central electrode sites during an Alcohol Cued Go/No-Go task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  2. N2pc ERP amplitude (in microvolts) elicited from a visual dot probe detection task

    The N2pc component of the event-related potential occurring 200-275 ms after stimulus presentation at parietal and occipital electrode sites (ipsilateral minus contralateral hemisphere activity) during a modified visual dot probe detection task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  3. P3b ERP amplitude (in microvolts) elicited from a picture-viewing task

    The P3b component of the event-related potential occurring 300-600 ms after stimulus presentation at central and parietal electrode sites during a picture viewing task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  4. N2 ERP latency (in milliseconds) elicited from an Alcohol Cued Go/No-Go task

    The latency of the N2 component of the event-related potential from frontal and central electrode sites during a picture viewing task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task. Latency will be determined using 50% area latency from a difference wave between task conditions

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  5. N2pc ERP latency (in milliseconds) elicited from a visual dot probe detection task

    The latency of the N2pc component of the event-related potential from parietal and occipital electrode sites during a visual dot probe detection task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task. Latency will be determined using 50% area latency from a difference wave between task conditions

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  6. P3b ERP latency (in milliseconds) elicited from a picture-viewing task

    The latency of the P3b component of the event-related potential from central and parietal electrode sites during a picture viewing task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task. Latency will be determined using 50% area latency from a difference wave between task conditions

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  7. Task accuracy from the behavioral response during the Alcohol Cued Go/No-Go task

    Task accuracy as a percentage of correct behavioral responses to the task during the Alcohol Cued Go/No-Go ERP task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  8. Reaction time from the behavioral response during the Alcohol Cued Go/No-Go task

    Reaction time for the correct behavioral responses to the task measured in milliseconds during the Alcohol Cued Go/No-Go ERP task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  9. Task accuracy from the behavioral response during the visual dot probe detection task

    Task accuracy as a percentage of correct behavioral responses to the task during the visual dot probe detection task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

  10. Reaction time from the behavioral response during the visual dot probe detection task

    Reaction time for the correct behavioral responses to the task measured in milliseconds during the visual dot probe ERP task following a 5-minute course of resonance breathing compared to a low-demand control task

    Time frame: Immediate; Difference between the active resonance breathing compared to the low demand cognitive task occurring one week apart

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We plan to share data via the NIAAA Data Archive (NIAAADA) repository within the larger National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA). Data generated by the proposed project include the following information on participants (male and female) aged 18-35 years: Surveys: Basic Demographics (Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicity, Height/Weight) Current Alcohol and Substance Use Alcohol Use Questionnaire (AUQ), Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS), and Alcohol Sensitivity Questionnaire Electrophysiological Data: N2pc, P3b, and N2 components of the human event-related brain potential (ERP) Collected during three cognitive tasks of cue reactivity (2) and inhibitory control (1)

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: At the conclusion of data collection and no later than 24 months after the NIH award end date or 6 months post-publication of the final data set (whichever date occurs first). There is no restriction for how long the data will be available.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05369169
Responsible party
Brandon Alderman, Ph.D. (Associate Professor and Chair, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2022
Start date
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
Jun 30, 2024
Last update
Apr 20, 2026

Study contacts

Brandon L Alderman, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Marsha E Bates, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion