ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05362292TRIUMPHUpdated Mar 6, 2026

TReating Incontinence for Underlying Mental and Physical Health

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tolterodine Tartrate ER and Mirabegron in Urinary Incontinence, Urge, Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-06.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
270
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 135 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Urge with a site in United States — 20 open to participants now, 27 under way, none of them phase 3. Urinary Incontinence, Urge · United States.

Planned enrollment
22nd of 119
270 · median 75
Started
2022
with 8 others
Phase 4
19 of 135
4 open now
Primary completion
2027-05
later than 20 of 26 live
Registered
105th of 135
by date
Lead sponsor
6 of 135
University of California, San Francisco

Among the 135 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Urge with a site in United States, this one is the 22nd largest by planned enrollment of the 119 interventional ones, is one of 9 that started in 2022, is one of 19 in phase 4, reaches primary completion later than 20 of the 26 other live ones, and was the 105th registered.

By phase

135 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase72 · 11 open
Phase 4this study19 · 4 open
Observational15 · 4 open
Phase 314 · 0 open
Phase 29 · 1 open
Phase 15 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2003; this study’s year is marked. 9 started in 2022.

Size and results

Median enrollment 75 across the 119 interventional studies, 47 across the 15 observational. Of the 96 that completed or were terminated, 51 (53%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 135 studies in Urinary Incontinence, Urge with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The TRIUMPH study is a randomized, double-blinded, 3-arm, parallel-group trial designed to compare the effects of anticholinergic bladder therapy versus a) beta-3-adrenergic agonist bladder therapy and b) no bladder pharmacotherapy on cognitive, urinary, and other aging-related functional outcomes in ambulatory older women with urgency-predominant urinary incontinence and either normal or mildly impaired cognitive function at baseline.

03

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence, Urge
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Overactive Bladder
  • Incontinence, Urge
  • Incontinence, Urinary
  • Incontinence
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 60 years or older at the time of enrollment
  • Female sex at birth, without surgical or hormonal gender re-assignment therapy
  • Able to walk to the bathroom and use the toilet without assistance
  • Report urinary incontinence starting at least 3 months prior to screening
  • Report that at least half of incontinence episodes occur with a sudden or strong sensation of urgency
  • Report 2 or more urgency incontinence episodes over a 7-day period
  • Willing to provide and adhere to study procedures throughout the length of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior clinician diagnosis of dementia, or a (MOCA) score of 17 or lower on screening cognitive evaluation
  • Current use of anticholinergic, beta-3-adrenergic agonist, or other medication designed to improve urgency incontinence symptoms, or use in the past 1 month
  • Initiation, discontinuation, or dose change of dementia medications (such as donepezil, galantamine, memantine, rivastigmine) in the past 1 month (but candidates on stable doses are eligible)
  • Initiation, discontinuation, or dose change of other drugs with strong anticholinergic effects (based on the Beers List) in the past 1 month (but candidates on stable doses are eligible)
  • Initiation, discontinuation, or dose change of other drugs that can affect urinary frequency, including diuretics, in the past 1 month (but candidates on stable doses are eligible)
  • Current urinary tract infection (UTI) based on screening urinalysis and culture (but candidates can re-present for re-screening after undergoing treatment for UTI)
  • History of allergy or sensitivity to either of the study medications or an ingredient in the placebo or study medication capsule
  • Severe hepatic impairment ( score B or greater) or renal impairment ( \<30 mL/min) as a to both study medications
  • Current bladder obstruction or urinary retention (defined by symptoms suggesting difficulty emptying the bladder in addition to postvoid residual urine volume greater than 150 cc by portable bladder ultrasound)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (based on measured systolic blood pressure greater than 180 or diastolic blood pressure greater than 110 mmHg) as a contraindication to beta-3-adrenergic therapy
  • Self-reported history of gastric retention, uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, severe ulcerative colitis, or toxic megacolon as contraindications for anticholinergic bladder therapy
  • Use of drugs with adverse interactions with one of the study medications in the past 1 month, including potent inhibitors, hepatic enzyme metabolism inducers, narrow therapeutic index drugs metabolized by CYP2D6, or intention to start taking one of these medications during the study treatment period
  • History of bladder surgery, invasive intra-vesical therapy, or bulk bladder injections in the past 3 months (more remote surgery will not be exclusionary), or intention to undergo one of these procedures in the study treatment period
  • Use of other specialized incontinence therapy (electrostimulation, pelvic physiotherapy, formal behavioral therapy overseen by certified practitioners) in the past 3 months (more remote therapy will not be exclusionary), or intention to undergo one of these procedures in the study treatment period
  • Inability to sign or complete questionnaires, interviews, or study testing in English
  • Other condition that would prevent the participant from completing study procedures, in the opinion of the investigators (e.g., uncontrolled psychosis)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
270 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Anticholinergic bladder medication plus behavioral self-management education

    Tolterodine tartrate is a muscarinic receptor antagonist designed to treat urgency incontinence, urgency, and frequency associated with overactive bladder. Behavioral self-management education includes written education about timed urination, lifestyle changes, pelvic floor muscle exercises, and urge suppression.

    Drug: Tolterodine Tartrate ER

  • Active comparator
    Beta-3-adrenergic agonist medication plus behavioral self-management education

    Mirabegron, currently sold under the brand name Mybetriq by Astellas Pharma, is a selective beta-3-adrenergic receptor agonist approved for treatment of urgency urinary incontinence, urgency, and frequency associated with overactive bladder. Behavioral self-management education includes written education about timed urination, lifestyle changes, pelvic floor muscle exercises, and urge suppression.

    Drug: Mirabegron

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo medication plus behavioral self-management education

    Microcrystalline cellulose placebo encapsulated to appear identical to tolterodine and mirabegron medication will be prepared by a compounding pharmacy. Behavioral self-management education includes written education about timed urination, lifestyle changes, pelvic floor muscle exercises, and urge suppression.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in composite cognitive function over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment, using a composite cognitive score that incorporates normalized data from all domain-specific cognitive tests.

    The composite cognitive score will be calculated as the average of Z-scores from the following individual cognitive tests: a) Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT); b) Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT) part A; c) OTMT part B; d) Digit Span Test; and e) Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). The normative mean of each cognitive test will be subtracted from each participant's component test score, and this difference will be divided by the standard deviation for the appropriate normative sample. After scores from individual tests are transformed to Z scores as a common metric based on normative data, the average Z score from all available tests will be calculated to provide a composite Z score.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in composite cognitive function over 9 months (36 weeks), using a composite cognitive score that incorporates normalized data from all domain-specific cognitive tests.

    The composite cognitive score will be calculated as the average of Z-scores from the following individual cognitive tests: a) Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT); b) Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT) part A; c) OTMT part B; d) Digit Span Test; and e) Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). The normative mean of each cognitive test will be subtracted from each participant's component test score, and this difference will be divided by the standard deviation for the appropriate normative sample. After scores from individual tests are transformed to Z scores as a common metric based on normative data, the average Z score from all available tests will be calculated to provide a composite Z score.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  2. Change in Auditory Verbal Learning Test total learning score assessed over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment

    The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), a widely used test of immediate and delayed verbal learning with established norms in older adults and multiple alternate forms. The total learning score is the sum of words learned from trials 1-5.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  3. Change in Auditory Verbal Learning Test total learning score assessed over 9 months (36 weeks).

    The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), a widely used test of immediate and delayed verbal learning with established norms in older adults and multiple alternate forms. The total learning score is the sum of words learned from trials 1-5.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  4. Change Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed free recall score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), a widely used test of immediate and delayed verbal learning with established norms in older adults and multiple alternate forms. Score range of 0-15.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  5. Change Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed free recall score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), a widely used test of immediate and delayed verbal learning with established norms in older adults and multiple alternate forms. Score range of 0-15.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  6. Change in Oral Trail Making A score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    The oral version of the Trail Making Test (OTMT), a timed measure of attention (part A) and executive function (part B) adapted from the written TMT, with established norms for participants across a wide range of ages. Range of 1-150 seconds

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  7. Change in Oral Trail Making A score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    The oral version of the Trail Making Test (OTMT), a timed measure of attention (part A) and executive function (part B) adapted from the written TMT, with established norms for participants across a wide range of ages. Range of 1-150 seconds

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  8. Change in Oral Trail Making B score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    The oral version of the Trail Making Test (OTMT), a timed measure of attention (part A) and executive function (part B) adapted from the written TMT, with established norms for participants across a wide range of ages. Range of 1-300 seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  9. Change in Oral Trail Making B score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    The oral version of the Trail Making Test (OTMT), a timed measure of attention (part A) and executive function (part B) adapted from the written TMT, with established norms for participants across a wide range of ages. Range of 1-300 seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  10. Change in Digit Span reverse component (total correct trials) over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    The Digit Span Reverse (total correct trials), a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence and Memory Scales, a test of attention and short-term verbal memory, with reliability across in-person and videoconference platforms. Range of 0-14.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  11. Change in Digit Span reverse component (total correct trials) over 9 months (36 weeks).

    The Digit Span Reverse (total correct trials), a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence and Memory Scales, a test of attention and short-term verbal memory, with reliability across in-person and videoconference platforms. Range of 0-14.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  12. Change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), a timed, written test assessing incidental memory, visual scanning, and processing speed, in which subjects translate numbers into symbols using a key. Range of 1-133.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  13. Change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), a timed, written test assessing incidental memory, visual scanning, and processing speed, in which subjects translate numbers into symbols using a key. Range of 1-133.

    Time frame: Baseline 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  14. Change in frequency of urgency-type incontinence (episodes/week) over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Frequency and type of incontinence will be assessed using a standardized, 7-day voiding diary.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  15. Change in frequency of urgency-type incontinence (episodes/week) over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Frequency and type of incontinence will be assessed using a standardized, 7-day voiding diary.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  16. Change in frequency of any-type incontinence (episodes/week) over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Frequency and type of incontinence will be assessed using a standardized, 7-day voiding diary.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  17. Change in frequency of any-type incontinence (episodes/week) over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Frequency and type of incontinence will be assessed using a standardized, 7-day voiding diary.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  18. Resolution of urinary incontinence from baseline to 6 months (24 weeks).

    Frequency and type of incontinence will be assessed using a standardized, 7-day voiding diary.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  19. Resolution of urinary incontinence from baseline to 9 months (36 weeks).

    Frequency and type of incontinence will be assessed using a standardized, 7-day voiding diary.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  20. Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short-Form (OAB-Q SF) Symptom Bother domain score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Bothersomeness and impact of overactive bladder symptoms (such as urgency, incontinence, and nocturia) will be assessed using the short-form of the OAB-Q, which generates both a Symptom Bother domain and a Health-Related Quality of Life domain score.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  21. Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short-Form (OAB-Q SF) Symptom Bother domain score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Bothersomeness and impact of overactive bladder symptoms (such as urgency, incontinence, and nocturia) will be assessed using the short-form of the OAB-Q, which generates both a Symptom Bother domain and a Health-Related Quality of Life domain score.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  22. Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short-Form (OAB-Q SF) Health-Related Quality of Life domain score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Bothersomeness and impact of overactive bladder symptoms (such as urgency, incontinence, and nocturia) will be assessed using the short-form of the OAB-Q, which generates both a Symptom Bother domain and a Health-Related Quality of Life domain score.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  23. Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short-Form (OAB-Q SF) Health-Related Quality of Life domain score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Bothersomeness and impact of overactive bladder symptoms (such as urgency, incontinence, and nocturia) will be assessed using the short-form of the OAB-Q, which generates both a Symptom Bother domain and a Health-Related Quality of Life domain score.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  24. Change in global sleep quality score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Perceived sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), an 18-item validated questionnaire designed to assess sleep quality, latency, efficiency, and problems over a one-week period.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  25. Change in global sleep quality score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Perceived sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), an 18-item validated questionnaire designed to assess sleep quality, latency, efficiency, and problems over a one-week period.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  26. Change in daytime sleepiness score over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Daytime sleepiness will be assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), an 8-item questionnaire assessing the level of general sleepiness during real life situations in order to distinguish excessive daytime sleepiness from normal daytime sleepiness.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  27. Change in daytime sleepiness score over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Daytime sleepiness will be assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), an 8-item questionnaire assessing the level of general sleepiness during real life situations in order to distinguish excessive daytime sleepiness from normal daytime sleepiness.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  28. Change in perceived physical function over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Perceived physical function will be assessed using the PROMIS 10B Adult Physical Function Scale, a 10-item measure that assesses the extent to which daily activities are limited by function of the extremities and central regions.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  29. Change in perceived physical function over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Perceived physical function will be assessed using the PROMIS 10B Adult Physical Function Scale, a 10-item measure that assesses the extent to which daily activities are limited by function of the extremities and central regions.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  30. Change in confidence in maintaining balance over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Confidence in maintaining balance will be assessed using the 15-item Activities Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-S), in which participants self-rate their confidence in keeping balance with performing daily living tasks.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  31. Change in confidence in maintaining balance over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Confidence in maintaining balance will be assessed using the 15-item Activities Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-S), in which participants self-rate their confidence in keeping balance with performing daily living tasks.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  32. Change in overall physical performance over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Physical function will be directly assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), involving: 1) side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem balance tests; 2) a 4-meter walk test; and 3) 5 chair stands, in which participants will be asked to stand up repeatedly from a standard chair to a full extended standing position.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  33. Change in overall physical performance over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Physical function will be directly assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), involving: 1) side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem balance tests; 2) a 4-meter walk test; and 3) 5 chair stands, in which participants will be asked to stand up repeatedly from a standard chair to a full extended standing position.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  34. Change in static balance over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Static balance will additionally be assessed by asking participants to attempt to assume a one-legged stand for 30 seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  35. Change in static balance from over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Static balance will additionally be assessed by asking participants to attempt to assume a one-legged stand for 30 seconds.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  36. Change in lower extremity strength measured by chair stand testing over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Physical strength will be assessed 30-second chair stand, by asking participants to stand up as many times as possible within 30 seconds, with higher number indicating more strength or power.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  37. Change in lower extremity strength measured by chair stand testing over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Physical strength will be assessed 30-second chair stand, by asking participants to stand up as many times as possible within 30 seconds, with higher number indicating more strength or power.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  38. Change in depression symptoms over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Depression symptoms will be assessed using the 15-item short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), which assesses symptoms of depression over a 1-week period.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  39. Change in depression symptoms over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Depression symptoms will be assessed using the 15-item short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), which assesses symptoms of depression over a 1-week period.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  40. Change in anxiety symptoms over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Anxiety symptoms will be assessing using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7), 7-item short form, questionnaire to assess severity of anxiety symptoms over a 2-week period.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  41. Change in anxiety symptoms over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Anxiety symptoms will be assessing using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7), 7-item short form, questionnaire to assess severity of anxiety symptoms over a 2-week period.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  42. Change in constipation symptoms over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Symptoms of constipation as a possible side effect of anticholinergic therapy will be assessed by the 9-item PROMIS Constipation scale of the PROMIS Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Constipation Scale.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  43. Change in constipation symptoms over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Symptoms of constipation as a possible side effect of anticholinergic therapy will be assessed by the 9-item PROMIS Constipation scale of the PROMIS Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Constipation Scale.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

  44. Change in bowel incontinence symptoms over 6 months (24 weeks) of treatment.

    Bowel incontinence as a syndrome that frequently overlaps with urinary incontinence will be assessed using the 4-item PROMIS Bowel Incontinence scale.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months (end of treatment)

  45. Change in bowel incontinence symptoms over 9 months (36 weeks).

    Bowel incontinence as a syndrome that frequently overlaps with urinary incontinence will be assessed using the 4-item PROMIS Bowel Incontinence scale.

    Time frame: Baseline to 9 months (3 months after end of treatment)

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Huang AJ, Walter LC, Yaffe K, Vittinghoff E, Kornblith E, Schembri M, Chang A, Subak LL. TReating Incontinence for Underlying Mental and Physical Health (TRIUMPH): a study protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, 3-arm trial to evaluate the multisystem effects of pharmacologic treatment strategies for urgency-predominant urinary incontinence in ambulatory older women. Trials. 2023 Apr 21;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07279-z. PubMed 37085880 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The investigative team will make publicly available de-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the publication. This will include data about the baseline characteristics of enrolled participants and any primary or secondary trial outcomes presented in the publication. To gain access, data requestors will be asked to sign a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Informed consent form

Time frame: Starting no later than 6 months following publication of the main trial results (including on-line publication), the investigative team will make publicly available de-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the publication. This will include data about the baseline characteristics of the study participants and any primary or secondary trial outcomes presented in the publication.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 54 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 2, 2022
First posted
May 5, 2022
StartActual
Oct 4, 2022
Primary completionEst.
May 2, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2, 2027
Last update
Mar 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05362292
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 5, 2022
Start date
Oct 4, 2022
Primary completion
May 2, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 6, 2026

Study contacts

Alison Huang, MD, MAS, MPhil
Contact
alison.huang@ucsf.edu
415-514-8697
Ann Chang
Contact
ann.chang@ucsf.edu
Alison Huang, MD, MAS, MPhil
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Tolterodine · Mirabegron

Start the discussion