ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05348330Updated Dec 3, 2024

Mid-point to Pleura Transverse Process Block Versus Thoracic Intervertebral Foramen Block

An interventional study of Thoracic intervertebral foramen block and Mid-point to pleura transverse process block in Pain, Acute, Rib Fractures and Polytrauma, sponsored by San Salvatore Hospital of L'Aquila. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-03.

Sponsored by San Salvatore Hospital of L'Aquila · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The analgesic effect of continuous mid-point to pleura transverse process block compared to the analgesic effect of continuous thoracic intervertebral foramen block, in patients with multiple rib fractures.

Read the detailed description

The analgesic effect of continuous mid-point to pleura transverse process block will be compared to the analgesic effect of continuous thoracic intervertebral foramen block, in patients with multiple rib fractures, by using the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Acute
  • Rib Fractures
  • Polytrauma

Keywords

  • Analgesia
  • Local anesthetics
  • Myofascial block
  • Ultrasound guidance
03

In context

Acute Pain

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 166 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 86 across 902 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

San Salvatore Hospital of L'Aquila is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ribs fracture after polytrauma

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • allergy to anesthetics
  • head trauma
  • history of neurological impairment (primary or secondary)
  • history of cancer
  • history of
  • infections of skin close to the block site
  • systemic infections
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Thoracic intervertebral foramen block

    Under ultrasound guidance the continuous thoracic intervertebral foramen block, will be provided to achieve analgesia in polytraumatic patients with rib fractures. A set for continuous peripheral nerve block will be used. The infusion rate of analgesic solution (levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with dexamethasone 16 mg) will be titrated to patient perceived pain.

    Procedure: Thoracic intervertebral foramen block

  • Active comparator
    Mid-point to pleura transverse process block

    Under ultrasound guidance the continuous mid-point to pleura transverse process block, will be provided to achieve analgesia in polytraumatic patients with rib fractures. A set for continuous peripheral nerve block will be used. The infusion rate of analgesic solution (levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with dexamethasone 16 mg) will be titrated to patient perceived pain.

    Procedure: Mid-point to pleura transverse process block

Interventions

  • ProcedureThoracic intervertebral foramen block

    Under ultrasound guidance the continuous thoracic intervertebral foramen block, will be provided to achieve analgesia in polytraumatic patients with rib fractures. A set for continuous peripheral nerve block will be used. The infusion rate of analgesic solution (levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with dexamethasone 16 mg) will be titrated to patient perceived pain. The block will be performed close, by considering the level of rib fractures.

  • ProcedureMid-point to pleura transverse process block

    Under ultrasound guidance the continuous mid-point to pleura transverse process block, will be provided to achieve analgesia in polytraumatic patients with rib fractures. A set for continuous peripheral nerve block will be used. The infusion rate of analgesic solution (levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with dexamethasone 16 mg) will be titrated to patient perceived pain. The block will be performed close, by considering the level of rib fractures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diaphragmatic motion

    The percentage of diaphragmatic thickening measured as thickness at end-inspiration-thickness at end-expiration divided by thickness at end-expiration

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

  2. Arterial blood gas analysis

    Fraction of inspired oxygen to partial pressure of oxygen ratio

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

  3. Airflow rate

    Patient airflow rate measured in mL/second, by using an incentive spirometer with three balls

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

  4. Blood pressure

    Invasive blood pressure (systolic and diastolic pressure in mmHg)

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

  5. Sensory block

    Response to the stimulus (yes or no), by using a piece of cotton, and ice in a finger of surgical glove on the patient's skin.

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

  6. Request of analgesic drugs

    Consumption of analgesic drugs (equivalent mg of morphine)

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

  7. Anesthetic spread

    Thoracic paravertebral space spread (yes or no), evaluated with ultrasonography

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

  8. Complication

    Number of pneumothorax, hemothorax, hematoma, pain, infection, and neurological impairment by the block

    Time frame: First 72 hours from the block

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Emiliano
    L'Aquila, 67100, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2022 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 22 months.

Of 424 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Acute Pain, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23. This study's 22 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 430 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 2, 2022
First posted
Apr 27, 2022
StartActual
Dec 4, 2022
Primary completionActual
Oct 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 28, 2024
Last update
Dec 3, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05348330
Lead sponsor
San Salvatore Hospital of L'Aquila
Responsible party
Emiliano Petrucci (Medical Doctor, San Salvatore Hospital of L'Aquila) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2022
Start date
Dec 4, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2024
Completion
Nov 28, 2024
Last update
Dec 3, 2024

Study contacts

Emiliano Petrucci, MD
principal investigator · San Salvatore Acadec Hospital of L'Aquila (Italy)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion