ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05346536CTC-AXL-PANCUpdated Jun 22, 2026

Liquid Biopsy and Pancreas Cancer: Detection of AXL(+) CTCs (CTC-AXL-PANC)

An interventional study of Detection of circulating tumor cells expressing Axl: CTC-AXL(+) in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer and Circulating Tumor Cell, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In solid cancers, some more aggressive tumor cells actively detach from the primary lesion and then travel through the circulating compartment to reach distant organs and form micro-metastases. These circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that have become disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) flourish in their new environments and may remain dormant for many years after the complete resection of the primary tumor. Detecting CTCs in the blood is also relevant for assessing tumor progression, prognosis and therapeutic follow-up. The non-invasive, highly sensitive for CTCs analysis is called "liquid biopsy". Pancreatic adenocarcinoma and breast cancer remain among cancers of very poor prognosis and thus represent a major therapeutic challenge. In recent years, the Axl membrane tyrosine kinase receptor has been the target of growing interest. Activation of the Gas6/Axl signaling pathway is associated with, among other things, tumor cell growth and survival, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) or drug resistances. In addition, Axl overexpression is frequently identified in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and is associated with a poor prognosis. For example, the Laboratoire des Cellules Circulantes Rares Humaines (LCCRH) at the CHU and the University of Montpellier has developed two new "CTC-AXL" tests to detect CTCs expressing Axl: one using the CellSearch® (gold standard and FDA-approved) system and the other using the EPIDROP technique. The purpose of this research project is to assess the concordance of the "CTC-AXL" measurement by the innovative EPIDROP technique and the CellSearch® technique in patients with metastatic pancreatic or breast cancer.

Read the detailed description

In solid cancers, after the formation and growth of the primary tumor, some more aggressive tumor cells actively detach from it and then travel through the circulating compartment to reach distant organs (bone marrow - liver - lung - brain…) and constitute new foci or micro-metastases. These circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that have become disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) flourish in their new environments and may remain dormant for many years after the complete resection of the primary tumor. Due to events not fully elucidated, DTCs can develop on site giving rise to macroscopic metastases but also join again the circulating compartment in the form of CTCs, swarm, colonize other organs and cause secondary metastases.

Detecting CTCs in the blood is very relevant for assessing tumor progression but also promising in terms of cancer disease prognosis and therapeutic follow-up. This new approach, published for the first time in 2010 under the term liquid biopsy, is therefore defined as a non-invasive blood test, extremely sensitive, achievable in real time and that allows the analysis of CTCs.

Currently, the choice of targeted therapies for a given patient is made after analyzing the primary tumor for expression and/or genomic status of specific molecular targets.

Many studies show that metastatic cells have phenotypic and genotypic characteristics distinct from those of most of the primary tumor. This can be explained either because metastatic cells acquire new genomic skills over time, or because a subset of metastatic sub-clone pre-exists within the primary tumor but has escaped detection by standard tissue biopsy techniques.

A direct analysis of CTCs could provide important additional information to prevent patients from inappropriate, costly treatments and harmful side effects.

For several years, the AXL protein, a tyrosine kinase receptor, has emerged as a new strategic target in oncology. Over-expression of AXL has been frequently identified in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. AXL is a member of the Tyro3-Axl-Mer family, like its ligand protein Gas-6 (growth arrest-specific). An activation of the Gas6/AXL signaling pathway results in the activation of several effector pathways such as RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK or PI3K/AKT and is associated with, among other things, tumor cell growth and survival, metastatic formation and dissemination, Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) or drug resistances. It has been shown clinically that the AXL protein is a factor of poor prognosis and resistance to reference treatments (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or targeted therapy). Thus, many therapeutic strategies have been proposed and developed to inhibit the AXL pathway, ranging from chemical molecules, blocking its kinase activity and therefore the underlying signaling pathways, to nucleotide aptamers, AXL fusion proteins, and monoclonal antibodies.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the 4th leading of cancer related deaths, remains among cancers of very poor prognosis and thus represents a major therapeutic challenge. The median overall survival is 11.1 months after optimal treatment (FOLFIRINOX). The clinical relevance and oncogenic potential of AXL in the progression of different types of tumors have been largely evidenced. Indeed, 50% to 75% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples have overexpression of AXL and the level of expression of AXL is correlated with clinical parameters indicating tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis such as frequency of distant metastases or the survival.

In this context, the LCCRH lab, which has specialized in the detection and analysis of CTCs for 20 years, has developed a CTC-AXL detection test using the CellSearch® system. The CellSearch® system is the only method approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the detection of CTC in colorectal, breast and metastatic prostate cancers. In addition, the LCCRH holds a patent for another technology for the detection and characterization of live and functional CTCs, called EPIDROP. The implementation of the AXL research is already done for AXL labelling on CTCs in EPIDROP as well as the visualization of the AXL cleavage by live CTC.

Thanks to this unique functional test of CTCs, it is easy to imagine offering an oncology 'oncogram' by testing in real time the effectiveness of drugs on CTCs and personalized medicine to patients.

This real-time liquid biopsy proposal on functional CTCs is quite innovative in Oncology.

To date, there are no studies on the study of functional CTCs related to AXL.

Primary objective:

- Evaluate the concordance of the CTC-AXL measurement (inclusive) by the innovative EPIDROP technique and the CellSearch technique®

Secondary objectives:

  • Evaluate the accuracy of the CTC-AXL measurement (inclusive) between EPIDROP and CellSearch®
  • Assess the degree of agreement between CTC-AXL measurement (inclusive) by EPIDROP and CellSearch®
  • Evaluate the overall survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer based on the number of circulating tumour cells carrying the AXL marker measured by EPIDROP or CellSearch® at inclusion
  • Evaluate the progression-free survival of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer based on the number of circulating tumour cells carrying the AXL marker measured by EPIDROP or CellSearch® at inclusion
  • Culture CTCs from the blood sample (EDTA 10mL)
  • Creation of a single liquid biopsy bio-bank for pancreatic cancer involving only plasma storage

    • Study the expression of PD-L1 (at inclusion) and detect the CTC subgroup expressing PD-L1 using EPIDROP and CellSearch® techniques;
    • Study the circulating immune system in this cohort of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer by performing immunological analysis on blood mononuclear cells;
    • Determine if there is a significant correlation between the detection of CTC and CTC-PD-L1 and the circulating immune system (T cells, NK cells, B cells, macrophages, immune checkpoints, platelets);
    • To assess the correlation between CTC, CTC-PD-L1 and immune cells and the clinical outcomes (progression-free survival, overall survival) of these patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
  • Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
  • Circulating Tumor Cell

Keywords

  • Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
  • Circulating Tumor Cell
  • AXL
  • CellSearch
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,896 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 1,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 63 is above the median of 47 across 2,932 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,261 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient is at least 18 years old;
  • Patients with pancreatic cancer with remote , naïve of any treatment, that is, eligible for a of treatment;
  • Patients with oral consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-affiliation or non-beneficiary of a Social Security regimen;
  • Frailty persons according to Article L1121-6 of the CSP;
  • Adult protected or unable to give consent as per Article L1121-8 of the CPMP;
  • Pregnant or lactating women as per MSC L1121-5.
  • Not included for monitoring difficulties (mutation, insufficient motivation, predictable poor compliance, priority associated pathology in care, etc.)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Metastatic pancreatic cancer treatment-naive patients

    Newly diagnosed major patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, naïve of any treatment for metastatic disease

    Other: Detection of circulating tumor cells expressing Axl: CTC-AXL(+)

Interventions

  • OtherDetection of circulating tumor cells expressing Axl: CTC-AXL(+)

    Detection of CTC-AXL(+) using 2 techniques: * CellSearch®, FDA-USA approved technology * EPIDROP System CellSearch® (Menarini Company) The current gold-standard CellSearch® technique requires the use of CellSave tubes. This technique allows the isolation of fixed CTCs. This technique uses a positive (CellSearch® Epithelial Cell Kit) enrichment method from total blood using magnetic beads coupled to an EpCAM capture antibody. CTCs are then detected (anti-panCK antibodies, DAPI, anti-CD45 and characterized (anti-AXL antibody) by immunofluorescence (IF). EPIDROP It requires the use of EDTA tubes. This technique is based on a method of negative enrichment of CTCs from total blood using a cocktail of tetrameric antibodies to eliminate unwanted blood cells and to preserve only purified tumor cells (RosetteSep - StemCell Technology).Then, cells are loaded in a microfluidic chip. The detection and characterization is done by IF to the single cell in micro-droplets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CTC-AXL measurement concordance rate

    CTC-AXL measurement concordance rate by EPIDROP (AXL(-): 0 vs AXL(+): 1) and CellSearch® (AXL(-): 0 vs AXL(+): 1)

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity (Se) defined as the proportion of AXL(+) positive patients (assessed by reference technique: CellSearch®) with a positive EPIDROP result

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Specificity (Sp) defined as the proportion of AXL(-) negative patients (assessed by reference technique: CellSearch®) with a negative result by EPIDROP

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Positive predictive value (PPV) defined as the proportion of patients with a positive EPIDROP result that is actually positive (as assessed by the reference technique: CellSearch®).

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Negative Predictive Value (VPN) defined as the proportion of patients, whose EPIDROP result is negative, that is effectively negative (assessed by reference technique: CellSearch®)

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Number of CTC-AXL at inclusion (0 vs 1 vs 2-3 vs 4 vs 5) measured by EPIDROP

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Number of CTC-AXL at inclusion (0 vs 1 vs 2-3 vs 4 vs 5) measured by the CellSearch technique®

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Overall Survival

    Overall survival defined by the time between the date of diagnosis of the metastatic disease and the date of death regardless of the cause

    Time frame: 36 months

  8. Progression-Free Survival

    Progression-free survival defined by the time between the date of diagnosis of the metastatic disease and the date of the 1st progression or the date of death regardless of the cause

    Time frame: 36 months

  9. Number of CTC at inclusion (0 vs 1 vs 2-3 vs 4 vs 5) measured by EPIDROP®

    Time frame: 30 days

  10. Number of CTC at inclusion (0 vs 1 vs 2-3 vs 4 vs 5) measured by the CellSearch technique®

    Time frame: 30 days

  11. CTC-PD-L1 measurement at inclusion (PD-L1(-): 0 vs PD-L1 (+): 1) measured by EPIDROP®

    Time frame: 30 days

  12. CTC-PD-L1 measurement at inclusion (PD-L1(-): 0 vs PD-L1 (+): 1) measured by the CellSearch technique®

    Time frame: 30 days

  13. Number of CTC-PD-L1 at inclusion (0 vs 1 vs 2-3 vs 4 vs 5) measured by EPIDROP®

    Number of CTC labelled by anti-PD-L1 antibody detected by EPIDROP®

    Time frame: 30 days

  14. Number of CTC-PD-L1 at inclusion (0 vs 1 vs 2-3 vs 4 vs 5) measured by the CellSearch technique®

    Number of CTC labelled by anti-PD-L1 antibody detected by CellSearch

    Time frame: 30 days

  15. Evaluation of circulating immune system: T cells

    Time frame: 30 days

  16. Evaluation of circulating immune system: NK cells

    Time frame: 30 days

  17. Evaluation of circulating immune system: B cells

    Time frame: 30 days

  18. Evaluation of circulating immune system: macrophages

    Time frame: 30 days

  19. Evaluation of circulating immune system: immune checkpoints

    Time frame: 30 days

  20. Evaluation of circulating immune system: platelets

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pantel K, Alix-Panabieres C. Tumour microenvironment: informing on minimal residual disease in solid tumours. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;14(6):325-326. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.53. Epub 2017 Apr 11. No abstract available. PubMed 28397823 ↗
  • Pantel K, Alix-Panabieres C. Liquid biopsy and minimal residual disease - latest advances and implications for cure. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul;16(7):409-424. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0187-3. PubMed 30796368 ↗
  • Alix-Panabieres C. The future of liquid biopsy. Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7800):S9. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00844-5. No abstract available. PubMed 32214259 ↗
  • Pantel K, Alix-Panabieres C. Circulating tumour cells in cancer patients: challenges and perspectives. Trends Mol Med. 2010 Sep;16(9):398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 29. PubMed 20667783 ↗
  • Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. PubMed 21561347 ↗
  • Conroy T, Gavoille C, Adenis A. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: old drugs, new paradigms. Curr Opin Oncol. 2011 Jul;23(4):390-5. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283473610. PubMed 21505335 ↗
  • Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Raoul JL, Chone L, Francois E, Artru P, Biagi JJ, Lecomte T, Assenat E, Faroux R, Ychou M, Volet J, Sauvanet A, Breysacher G, Di Fiore F, Cripps C, Kavan P, Texereau P, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Khemissa-Akouz F, Legoux JL, Juzyna B, Gourgou S, O'Callaghan CJ, Jouffroy-Zeller C, Rat P, Malka D, Castan F, Bachet JB; Canadian Cancer Trials Group and the Unicancer-GI-PRODIGE Group. FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2395-2406. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1809775. PubMed 30575490 ↗
  • Sohal DPS, Kennedy EB, Cinar P, Conroy T, Copur MS, Crane CH, Garrido-Laguna I, Lau MW, Johnson T, Krishnamurthi S, Moravek C, O'Reilly EM, Philip PA, Pant S, Shah MA, Sahai V, Uronis HE, Zaidi N, Laheru D. Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3217-3230. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01364. Epub 2020 Aug 5. PubMed 32755482 ↗
  • Koorstra JB, Karikari CA, Feldmann G, Bisht S, Rojas PL, Offerhaus GJ, Alvarez H, Maitra A. The Axl receptor tyrosine kinase confers an adverse prognostic influence in pancreatic cancer and represents a new therapeutic target. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009 Apr;8(7):618-26. doi: 10.4161/cbt.8.7.7923. Epub 2009 Apr 22. PubMed 19252414 ↗
  • Leconet W, Larbouret C, Chardes T, Thomas G, Neiveyans M, Busson M, Jarlier M, Radosevic-Robin N, Pugniere M, Bernex F, Penault-Llorca F, Pasquet JM, Pelegrin A, Robert B. Preclinical validation of AXL receptor as a target for antibody-based pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. Oncogene. 2014 Nov 20;33(47):5405-14. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.487. Epub 2013 Nov 18. PubMed 24240689 ↗
  • Kariolis MS, Miao YR, Jones DS 2nd, Kapur S, Mathews II, Giaccia AJ, Cochran JR. An engineered Axl 'decoy receptor' effectively silences the Gas6-Axl signaling axis. Nat Chem Biol. 2014 Nov;10(11):977-83. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1636. Epub 2014 Sep 21. PubMed 25242553 ↗
  • Shen Y, Chen X, He J, Liao D, Zu X. Axl inhibitors as novel cancer therapeutic agents. Life Sci. 2018 Apr 1;198:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.02.033. Epub 2018 Feb 27. PubMed 29496493 ↗
  • Tai KY, Shieh YS, Lee CS, Shiah SG, Wu CW. Axl promotes cell invasion by inducing MMP-9 activity through activation of NF-kappaB and Brg-1. Oncogene. 2008 Jul 3;27(29):4044-55. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.57. Epub 2008 Mar 17. PubMed 18345028 ↗
  • Li Y, Ye X, Tan C, Hongo JA, Zha J, Liu J, Kallop D, Ludlam MJ, Pei L. Axl as a potential therapeutic target in cancer: role of Axl in tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenesis. Oncogene. 2009 Oct 1;28(39):3442-55. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.212. Epub 2009 Jul 27. PubMed 19633687 ↗
  • Antony J, Huang RY. AXL-Driven EMT State as a Targetable Conduit in Cancer. Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 15;77(14):3725-3732. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0392. Epub 2017 Jun 30. PubMed 28667075 ↗
  • Rankin EB, Fuh KC, Taylor TE, Krieg AJ, Musser M, Yuan J, Wei K, Kuo CJ, Longacre TA, Giaccia AJ. AXL is an essential factor and therapeutic target for metastatic ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2010 Oct 1;70(19):7570-9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1267. Epub 2010 Sep 21. PubMed 20858715 ↗
  • Ye X, Li Y, Stawicki S, Couto S, Eastham-Anderson J, Kallop D, Weimer R, Wu Y, Pei L. An anti-Axl monoclonal antibody attenuates xenograft tumor growth and enhances the effect of multiple anticancer therapies. Oncogene. 2010 Sep 23;29(38):5254-64. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.268. Epub 2010 Jul 5. PubMed 20603615 ↗
  • Cerchia L, Esposito CL, Camorani S, Rienzo A, Stasio L, Insabato L, Affuso A, de Franciscis V. Targeting Axl with an high-affinity inhibitory aptamer. Mol Ther. 2012 Dec;20(12):2291-303. doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.163. Epub 2012 Aug 21. PubMed 22910292 ↗
  • Wilson C, Ye X, Pham T, Lin E, Chan S, McNamara E, Neve RM, Belmont L, Koeppen H, Yauch RL, Ashkenazi A, Settleman J. AXL inhibition sensitizes mesenchymal cancer cells to antimitotic drugs. Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 15;74(20):5878-90. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1009. Epub 2014 Aug 14. PubMed 25125659 ↗
  • Feneyrolles C, Spenlinhauer A, Guiet L, Fauvel B, Dayde-Cazals B, Warnault P, Cheve G, Yasri A. Axl kinase as a key target for oncology: focus on small molecule inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014 Sep;13(9):2141-8. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-1083. Epub 2014 Aug 19. PubMed 25139999 ↗
  • Gjerdrum C, Tiron C, Hoiby T, Stefansson I, Haugen H, Sandal T, Collett K, Li S, McCormack E, Gjertsen BT, Micklem DR, Akslen LA, Glackin C, Lorens JB. Axl is an essential epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-induced regulator of breast cancer metastasis and patient survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 19;107(3):1124-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909333107. Epub 2009 Dec 28. PubMed 20080645 ↗
  • Song X, Wang H, Logsdon CD, Rashid A, Fleming JB, Abbruzzese JL, Gomez HF, Evans DB, Wang H. Overexpression of receptor tyrosine kinase Axl promotes tumor cell invasion and survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;117(4):734-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25483. Epub 2010 Oct 4. PubMed 20922806 ↗
  • Zhang S, Xu XS, Yang JX, Guo JH, Chao TF, Tong Y. The prognostic role of Gas6/Axl axis in solid malignancies: a meta-analysis and literature review. Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Jan 23;11:509-519. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S150952. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29416351 ↗
  • Yu W, Ge X, Lai X, Lv J, Wang Y. The up-regulation of Axl is associated with a poor prognosis and promotes proliferation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019 May 1;12(5):1626-1633. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31933980 ↗
  • Jacot W, Mazel M, Mollevi C, Pouderoux S, D'Hondt V, Cayrefourcq L, Bourgier C, Boissiere-Michot F, Berrabah F, Lopez-Crapez E, Bidard FC, Viala M, Maudelonde T, Guiu S, Alix-Panabieres C. Clinical Correlations of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status in Liquid and Standard Biopsies in Breast Cancer. Clin Chem. 2020 Aug 1;66(8):1093-1101. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa121. PubMed 32712650 ↗
  • Sinoquet L, Jacot W, Gauthier L, Pouderoux S, Viala M, Cayrefourcq L, Quantin X, Alix-Panabieres C. Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1-Expressing Circulating Tumor Cells: A New Prognostic Biomarker in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Chem. 2021 Nov 1;67(11):1503-1512. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab131. PubMed 34355741 ↗
  • Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K. Liquid Biopsy: From Discovery to Clinical Application. Cancer Discov. 2021 Apr;11(4):858-873. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1311. PubMed 33811121 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2022 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 39 months.

Of 403 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pancreatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 75. This study's 39 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 430 studies reached it within 44 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 75.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 19, 2022
First posted
Apr 26, 2022
StartActual
Jun 16, 2022
Primary completionActual
Sep 19, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Jun 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05346536
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 26, 2022
Start date
Jun 16, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 19, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Study contacts

Thomas Bardol, MD
Contact
t-bardol@chu-montpellier.fr
+33682882757
Catherine Alix-Panabières, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Montpellier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion