CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05345496Updated Feb 15, 2024

Central and Peripheral Sensitization, Pain Mediators in Thumb Pain Among Physiotherapists

An observational study in Work-related Illness, sponsored by University of Turin, Italy. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-15.

Sponsored by University of Turin, Italy · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
135
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The work-related thumb pain is a common problem among physiotherapists which deal with this experience at least once in their life. Several studies analyzed the distribution of mechanical forces, kinematics, and kinesiology of the thumb in this clinical condition. However, there is no data, available in the literature, on how this pain processed is sustained and if plastic changes in the central or peripheral nervous system are involved. The research aims are to investigate the relationship between the thumb pain and pain related central and peripheral nervous sensitization phenomena among physiotherapists (exposed to work) and physiotherapy students (not exposed). The relevance of each of the pain chronification mediators, reported in the literature (anxiety, depression catastrophization, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia) will be also defined. Data on pain intensity, muscle strength, and endurance in the hand will be collected and the relation between peripheral sensitization phenomena in the hand, and central sensitization will be assessed. Also, the relevance of pain mediators and the health perceived status will be assess adopting validated questionnaires and the minimal Generic ICF core set.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Physiotherapists' work-related thumb pain is a problem recognized by the World Health Organization to be the major work-related musculoskeletal problems (WMSDs) for this profession. About 70.8% of physiotherapists experience thumb pain at least once in their life. In those who practice manual therapy, thumb pain can determine the use of compensatory strategies or the impossibility to practice wanted manipulation. It has been estimated that 1 in 6 physiotherapists end their careers because of WMSDs. The data available in the literature on biomechanics for this phenomenon do not allow to define a proper causa relation lacking to describe the impact of pain mechanisms involved, the impact of mediators of chronicity in pain, and health status.

The purpose of the present research is to investigate the relation between thumb pain and phenomena of central or peripheral plasticity among physiotherapists (exposed) and compare this data to physiotherapy students (not exposed). In particular, we aim to identify the relevance of each chronic pain mediator described in the literature (anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia) in this health condition.

Methods: A case-control study will be performed. 44 physiotherapists with thumb pain and 44 physiotherapy students will be evaluated. Muscle strength and endurance of the hand will be assessed. Assessment of peripheral sensitization phenomena will be performed with validated clinical tests. It will also be assessed the health status through the minimal ICF core set, the intensity of pain, and through validated questionnaires the central sensitization, anxiety, depression, catastrophization, kinesiophobia, and self-efficacy. The sample size of 44 subjects per group (10% dropout) was estimated a priori, with a clinically relevant effect size of d= .80 and with an estimated power (1- beta )= .95 and α= 0.05.

Expected results: The results of this study can improve the knowledge of the pain mechanisms involved and the complexity of this work-related disabling condition following a multifactorial biopsychosocial model. Results could also improve the prevention of thumb pain in physiotherapists with a relevant impact on this work-related disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Work-related Illness

Keywords

  • Thumb pain
  • Central sensistization
  • Peripheral sensitization
  • Modulating factors
  • ICF
  • Disability
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Physiotherapists registered in the professional register University students in physiotherapy BSc.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects giving their written consent to be enrolled in the study.
  • Subjects aged more than 18 years old.
  • Registration to the professional register or to the degree course in Physiotherapy
  • History of at least 1 episode of work-related thumb pain in the last 3 months for physiotherapists

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent or current pain/pathology of the upper limbs and neck;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Neurological disorders that increase or decrease the tone of upper limb and neck muscles;
  • Rheumatic diseases
  • Recent hand surgery
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
135 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • WORKERS GROUP

    44 physiotherapists with a history of at least 1 painful episode of work-related thumb pain in the last 3 months will be enrolled.

  • STUDENT GROUP

    44 physiotherapy students in their first academic year will be enrolled.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Italian Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-I)

    It will be adopted to assess central sensitization. It consists of two sections. Part A is made up of 25 self-reported items, each rated on a scale from 0 to 5 (0=never and 4=always), for a maximum score of 100. Part B analyses the presence of commonly related symptoms. A total score \< 40 shows good sensitivity to exclude the presence of signs and symptoms related to central sensitization.

    Time frame: the self-reported scale will be administered on day 1, before the clinical examination

  2. Quantitative sensory testing (QST)

    These tests will be adopted to assess peripheral and central sensitiazion phenomena.It will be tested 1cm2 of both dorsal and palmar skin. First, using the Neuropen tool patient will be asked to discriminate between a set of 3 alterante tactile and puncture stimuli. Then a mechanical pressure will be maintained on both sides for 10 seconds and asked if it was painful or not. Then 10 puncture stimuli in a row with Neuropen will be performed recording pain intensity.

    Time frame: Tests will be administered on day 1 for each site, by a physiotherapist using Neuropen

Secondary outcomes

  1. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Generic Core Set

    It will be used to assess the subject's health status. It consists in 7 items and includes the following subcategories: body functions (physiological functions of the body system), body structures (anatomical components such as organs, limbs, and their components), activities (execution of a task or activity by an individual), and participation (involvement in daily life).

    Time frame: the self-reported scale will be administered on day 1, before the clinical examination

  2. Italian Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-I)

    It will be used to assess the catastrophization. This scale consists of 13 items divided into three domains. Each item can achieve a maximum of 4 points, for a maximum of 52. The higher the score, the greater the presence of thoughts of catastrophization.

    Time frame: the self-reported scale will be administered on day 1, before the clinical examination

  3. Italian Tampa Scale for Kinesophobia (TSK-I)

    It will be used to measure kinesiophobia and fear of movement. This scale consists of 17 items assessing the fear of movement perception, scored 1 to 4 points (1=totally disagreeing: 4= strongly agree), achieving a score that varies between 17 and 68. The higher the score, the higher the level of fear related to movement.

    Time frame: the self-reported scale will be administered on day 1, before the clinical examination

  4. Italian Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS-I)

    It will be used to assess anxiety and depression.This scale consists of 14 items divided into two subcategories. The first 7 items investigate General anxiety, while the other 7 items, mainly investigate the state of anhedonia. For each item the score varies from 0-3 (0= absence; 3= extreme presence). Higher scores correspond to high levels of anxiety and depression.

    Time frame: the self-reported scale will be administered on day 1, before the clinical examination

  5. Italian Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-I)

    It will be used to detect self-efficacy. This scale consists of 10 items, whose score varies from 0-6 (0=not safe at all, 10= completely safe), for a total of 60 points. The lower the score, the lower the self-efficacy is.

    Time frame: the self-reported scale will be administered on day 1, before the clinical examination

  6. Upper Limb Neural Tension Test (ULNTT 1)

    It will be used to assess mechanosensitivity of the brachial plexus and upper limb nerves. It consists of a validated combination of physiological movement of the arm (shoulder depression, wrist and finger extension, forearm supination, shoulder external rotation, and elbow extension) and a symptom discrimination maneuvers (homolateral and contralateral cervical spine inclination) to assess the physiological mechanosensitivity of the nerves of the upper limb.

    Time frame: the test will be administered on day 1 by a physiotherapist during the clinical examination

  7. Vagus nerve neurodynamic test (VN-NDT)

    It will be performed to assess vagus nerve sensitization due to chronic stress. It consists of a combination of physiological movements of the neck (upper cervical flexion, contralateral lateral flexion, ipsilateral rotation) and gentle movements of the upper abdomen caudally and cranially to increase tension on the thoracic tract of the vagus nerve, and it assess the physiological mechanosensitivity of the vagus nerve and its effects on heart rate at rest.

    Time frame: the test will be administered on day 1 by a physiotherapist during the clinical examination

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Biological and Clinical Science - University of Turin
    Orbassano, TO 10043, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — There is a plan to make IPD and related data dictionaries available. All of the individual particiapnt data collected during the trial will be shared after deidentification

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05345496
Lead sponsor
University of Turin, Italy
Responsible party
Giacomo Carta (PhD Candidate Experimental Medicine and Therapy, MSc in Rehabilitation Scence, BSc in Pysiotherapy, University of Turin, Italy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 26, 2022
Start date
May 2, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 2, 2023
Completion
Apr 30, 2023
Last update
Feb 15, 2024

Study contacts

Giacomo Carta, MSc, PT BSc
principal investigator · University of Turin, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion