ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05331404AGEHEARUpdated Jul 5, 2022

Evaluation of Hearing Aids Rehabilitation Within Age-related Hearing Loss Population.

An interventional study of PET examination and Quality of life assessment in Hearing Loss, sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-05.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Toulouse · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hearing aids restore efficiently some auditory functions in age-related hearing loss (ARHL or presbycusis) providing to the elderly an access to oral communication and a return to social life. However, a most of the assessments of their efficacy focus on speech recognition. Spatial hearing and localization are anothers important auditory functions merely evaluated.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hearing aids benefits for spatial hearing.

Read the detailed description

The main objective is to evaluate the hearing aids benefits for spatial hearing with a multidisciplinary approach combing psychophysics, and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) brain imaging in a before/after experimental design. The novelty of the proposal is both theoretical and methodological: the team aim is to identify neural correlates of spatial hearing after hearing rehabilitation and evaluate the evolution of spatial hearing abilities once subjects with presbycusis are fitted with hearing aids. The assessment of spatial hearing processing will rely on both a virtual visuo-auditory 3D immersive platform and functional neuroimaging using PET scan. This project will provide crucial elements for understanding and improving the rehabilitation of age-related hearing loss.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss

Keywords

  • Presbycusis
  • Auditory cortex.
  • Auditory plasticity.
  • Localization
  • Speech-in-noise
  • PET
03

In context

Hearing Loss

796 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 193 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 44 across 561 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Toulouse is the lead sponsor of 807 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

For presbyacusics subjects:

  • Subjects aged over 50 with a difference in symmetrical audiometric thresholds (\< 15 dB) between the two ears and requiring hearing aids
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme or equivalent
  • Acceptance of the protocol and signature of the consent form

For older people with normal hearing:

  • Subjects matched in age (+/- 2 years) and gender with the presbycusis group
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme or equivalent
  • Acceptance of the protocol and signature of the consent form
  • Subjects with normal hearing, with hearing thresholds of 20 dB \< 2kHz and 40 dB \< 4kHz

For young people with normal hearing:

  • Subjects aged between 18 and 40 years old,
  • Symmetric normal hearing
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme or equivalent
  • Normally hearing subjects with audiometric thresholds \< 20 dB
  • Acceptance of the protocol and signature of the consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons under a legal protection regime for adults (safeguard of justice, guardianship, curator ship, institutionalized, or under mandate for future protection)
  • History of associated neurological pathology
  • to PET
  • Cognitive impairment confirmed by the (MOCA) test (for presbyacusic subjects and normal-hearing elderly subjects)
  • Taking psychotropic drugs
  • History of epilepsy
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Participation in another intervention protocol
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Presbycusis

    Patients with presbycusis who receive rehabilitation with hearing aids

    Radiation: PET examination · Other: Quality of life assessment

  • Active comparator
    Aged control group

    Aged control group: 15 subjects with normal or near-normal hearing thresholds

    Other: Quality of life assessment

  • Active comparator
    Young control group

    Young control group: 15 subjects with normal hearing thresholds

    Radiation: PET examination · Other: Quality of life assessment

Interventions

  • RadiationPET examination

    PET examinations with auditory stimuli such as human voice and environmental sounds.

  • OtherQuality of life assessment

    quality of life assessment by : * Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing * Hearing Handicap Inventory For The Elderly Screening * Short Form Health Survey

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. level of brain activity

    level of brain activity (in ml/100g/min) measured in the auditory regions in PET when the subject performs a spatial localization task

    Time frame: Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Life quality by Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing (12)

    Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing is a questionnaire specific to the quality of hearing. It has 3 sections; speech hearing, spatial hearing and quality of hearing. This questionnaire contains 15 items evaluated on a scale to 0 (not at all) to 10 (perfectly).

    Time frame: Month 12

  2. Life quality by Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing (6)

    Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing is a questionnaire specific to the quality of hearing. It has 3 sections; speech hearing, spatial hearing and quality of hearing. This questionnaire contains 15 items evaluated on a scale to 0 (not at all) to 10 (perfectly).

    Time frame: Month 6

  3. life quality by Hearing Handicap Inventory For The Elderly Screening (12)

    Hearing Handicap Inventory For The Elderly Screening contains 10 items to identify the social and emotional difficulties encountered by the subject due to his deafness according to specific situations. It makes it possible to detect the handicap perceived by the person (the higher the score, the greater the perception of the handicap due to hearing loss).

    Time frame: Month 12

  4. life quality by Hearing Handicap Inventory For The Elderly Screening (6)

    Hearing Handicap Inventory For The Elderly Screening contains 10 items to identify the social and emotional difficulties encountered by the subject due to his deafness according to specific situations. It makes it possible to detect the handicap perceived by the person (the higher the score, the greater the perception of the handicap due to hearing loss).

    Time frame: Month 6

  5. life quality by Short Form Health Survey (12)

    Short Form Health Survey assesses a patient's overall quality of life. It consists of 36 items.

    Time frame: Month 12

  6. life quality by Short Form Health Survey (6)

    Short Form Health Survey assesses a patient's overall quality of life. It consists of 36 items.

    Time frame: Month 6

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • CHU Toulouse
    Toulouse, 31059, France
    Recruiting
    • Mathieu MARX, PU-PH · Contactmarx.m@chu-toulouse.fr · 05 61 77 77 04
    • Mathieu MARX, PU-PH · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Strelnikov K, Rouger J, Demonet JF, Lagleyre S, Fraysse B, Deguine O, Barone P. Visual activity predicts auditory recovery from deafness after adult cochlear implantation. Brain. 2013 Dec;136(Pt 12):3682-95. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt274. Epub 2013 Oct 17. PubMed 24136826 ↗
  • Vannson N, James C, Fraysse B, Strelnikov K, Barone P, Deguine O, Marx M. Quality of life and auditory performance in adults with asymmetric hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:38-43. doi: 10.1159/000380746. Epub 2015 May 19. PubMed 25997394 ↗
  • Vannson N, James CJ, Fraysse B, Lescure B, Strelnikov K, Deguine O, Barone P, Marx M. Speech-in-noise perception in unilateral hearing loss: Relation to pure-tone thresholds and brainstem plasticity. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28;102:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 13. PubMed 28623107 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2024, 22 months after the start.

Of 196 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hearing Loss, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 22 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 321 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 11, 2022
First posted
Apr 15, 2022
StartActual
Jun 2, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2024
CompletionEst.
Apr 2024
Last update
Jul 5, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05331404
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2022
Start date
Jun 2, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 5, 2022

Study contacts

Mathieu MARX, Professor
Contact
marx.m@chu-toulouse.fr
05 61 77 77 04 ext. +33
Mathieu MARX, Professor
principal investigator · CHU Toulouse

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion