CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05319418Updated Apr 8, 2022

Effectiveness of BP Remote Monitoring With Virtual Physician Management in Hypertensive Patients.

An interventional study of Daily Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertension and Stroke (CVA) or TIA, sponsored by AIRx Health, Inc.. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-08.

Sponsored by AIRx Health, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the feasibility and adoptability of DailyDoctor's remote monitoring clinical decision support software tool in helping physicians virtually manage systolic blood pressures among patients with history of stroke or TIA to a target systolic blood pressure (\<140 mmHg or a lower target range specified by referring physicians) using remote monitoring and independent clinical judgement.

Read the detailed description

To assess the feasibility and adoptability of DailyDoctor's remote monitoring clinical decision support software tool in helping physicians virtually manage systolic blood pressures among patients with history of stroke or TIA to a target systolic blood pressure (\<140 mmHg or a lower target range specified by referring physicians) using remote monitoring and independent clinical judgement.

To assess the feasibility and adoptability of DailyDoctor's digital platform in helping Stanford Stroke Center lower and maintain systolic blood pressures among patients with history of stroke or TIA to a target systolic blood pressure (\<140 mmHg or a lower target range specified by referring physicians) using remote monitoring and a virtual medical team focused on BP management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension
  • Stroke (CVA) or TIA

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • remote patient monitoring
  • digital health monitoring
  • blood pressure monitoring
03

In context

Hypertension

6,689 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 964 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 90 across 4,994 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with AIRx Health, Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Age 18 years or older. A history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack. The ability to report blood pressure values by phone (either a patient or designated caregiver may call to report values).

At least 2 BP measurements that are ≥140 mmHg systolic or ≥90 mmHg diastolic obtained on different days in the last 6 months in any setting (including at home, in clinic, or in the hospital setting).

The referring physician feels the patient would benefit from BP optimization. Consent to receive care from telehealth physicians available through the DailyDoctor monitoring platform.

English or Spanish speaking.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Currently enrolled in another interventional research study Inability to comply with study protocol Have a planned surgical procedure during the study period Upper arm circumference > 20 inches Has diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (GFR \< 15 mL/min), Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (176.8 μmol/L), or currently undergoing dialysis treatment (10) Women who are pregnant or who are planning to become pregnant during the study period.

Blood pressure reduction is not indicated (e.g. patients who have a high blood pressure target to augment cerebral perfusion).

Any other reason that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the person a poor candidate for participation in this study

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hypertensive Patients Monitored Daily

    Physicians utilize DailyDoctor remote monitoring platform to virtually monitor daily BP of patients. Physicians use their independent medical judgement to recommend any clinical follow up or adjustment in medications/prescriptions for any patients whose daily reporting of BP triggers an alert based on physician-driven alert thresholds.

    Behavioral: Daily Blood Pressure Monitoring

Interventions

  • BehavioralDaily Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Patients are provided standard off-the-shelf blood pressure monitors and take their BP vitals daily. Patients report their daily BP through phone or online. BP data is viewed online by physicians who use their independent medical judgement for any changes in medical management.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent patients within target BP

    The change in the percentage of patients who are within their target blood pressure range between baseline (based on the average of the first 5 BP readings recorded by the patient using the DailyDoctor platform) and at the completion of the 24 week interv

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in average systolic blood pressure

    The average systolic blood pressure of the first 5 BP readings recorded by a patient using the DailyDoctor platform will be compared to the average of the last 5 readings of systolic blood pressure reported by the patient using the DailyDoctor platform.

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  2. Proportion of patients within target BP range

    Proportions of patients who are within their target blood pressure range during every 4-week period over 24 weeks.

    Time frame: Every 4-week period over 24 weeks.

  3. Time taken to achieve a clinically significant reduction in blood pressure

    Time taken to achieve a clinically significant reduction in blood pressure (5mmHg for systolic blood pressure or 2.5 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure)

    Time frame: Varies, recorded over 24 weeks

  4. Participant compliance

    Participant compliance, defined as the percentage of days that a patient transmits a vital sign reading on a monthly or weekly basis.

    Time frame: Recorded over 24 weeks

  5. Rate of blood pressure decline

    Rate of blood pressure decline

    Time frame: Recorded over 24 weeks

  6. Change in number of antihypertensive drugs

    Change in number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed between baseline and the final assessment

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  7. Change in number of classes of antihypertensive drugs

    Change in number of classes of antihypertensive drugs prescribed between baseline and the final assessment with 5 predefined classes: diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, β-blockers, and others (α-blockers, hydralazine, minoxidil, clonidine, reserpine, guanethidine, and methyldopa).

    Time frame: 24 Weeks

  8. Number and types of AEs & SAEs

    Number and types of AEs \& SAEs

    Time frame: Recorded over 24 weeks

  9. Proportions of patients of various BP categories

    Based on weekly and 4-weekly blood pressure averages, the proportions of patients who are classified as: Normal (\<120 mmHg systolic/ \<80 mmHg diastolic) Elevated (120-129 mmHg systolic/ \<80 mmHg diastolic). Stage 1 hypertensive: systolic pressure ranging from 130 to 139 mm Hg or a diastolic pressure ranging from 80 to 89 mm Hg. Stage 2 hypertensive: systolic pressure ≥140 mm Hg or a diastolic pressure ≥90 mm Hg.

    Time frame: Recorded over 24 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford Stroke Center
    Stanford, California 94304, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kitagawa K, Yamamoto Y, Arima H, Maeda T, Sunami N, Kanzawa T, Eguchi K, Kamiyama K, Minematsu K, Ueda S, Rakugi H, Ohya Y, Kohro T, Yonemoto K, Okada Y, Higaki J, Tanahashi N, Kimura G, Umemura S, Matsumoto M, Shimamoto K, Ito S, Saruta T, Shimada K; Recurrent Stroke Prevention Clinical Outcome (RESPECT) Study Group. Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on the Risk of Recurrent Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1309-1318. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2167. PubMed 31355878 ↗
  • Spruill TM, Williams O, Teresi JA, Lehrer S, Pezzin L, Waddy SP, Lazar RM, Williams SK, Jean-Louis G, Ravenell J, Penesetti S, Favate A, Flores J, Henry KA, Kleiman A, Levine SR, Sinert R, Smith TY, Stern M, Valsamis H, Ogedegbe G. Comparative effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPTM) plus nurse case management versus HBPTM alone among Black and Hispanic stroke survivors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Mar 15;16:97. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0605-5. PubMed 25873044 ↗
  • SPRINT Research Group; Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK, Sink KM, Rocco MV, Reboussin DM, Rahman M, Oparil S, Lewis CE, Kimmel PL, Johnson KC, Goff DC Jr, Fine LJ, Cutler JA, Cushman WC, Cheung AK, Ambrosius WT. A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx170008. PubMed 26551272 ↗
  • Ho TW, Huang CT, Chiu HC, Ruan SY, Tsai YJ, Yu CJ, Lai F; HINT Study Group. Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Taiwan-A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 31;6:23797. doi: 10.1038/srep23797. PubMed 27029815 ↗
  • Achelrod D, Schreyogg J, Stargardt T. Health-economic evaluation of home telemonitoring for COPD in Germany: evidence from a large population-based cohort. Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Sep;18(7):869-882. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0834-x. Epub 2016 Oct 3. Erratum In: Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jun;22(4):659-660. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01258-w. PubMed 27699567 ↗
  • Weissman GE, Kerlin MP, Yuan Y, Kohn R, Anesi GL, Groeneveld PW, Werner RM, Halpern SD. Potentially Preventable Intensive Care Unit Admissions in the United States, 2006-2015. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jan;17(1):81-88. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201905-366OC. PubMed 31581801 ↗
  • Logan AG, McIsaac WJ, Tisler A, Irvine MJ, Saunders A, Dunai A, Rizo CA, Feig DS, Hamill M, Trudel M, Cafazzo JA. Mobile phone-based remote patient monitoring system for management of hypertension in diabetic patients. Am J Hypertens. 2007 Sep;20(9):942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.020. PubMed 17765133 ↗
  • Stevens LA, Greene T, Levey AS. Surrogate end points for clinical trials of kidney disease progression. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Jul;1(4):874-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00600206. Epub 2006 Jun 14. No abstract available. PubMed 17699300 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05319418
Lead sponsor
AIRx Health, Inc.
Collaborators
Stanford University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 8, 2022
Start date
Apr 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2022

Study contacts

Michelle Howard
Contact
support@mydailydoctor.com
(408) 837-2211
Vijay Rajasekhar, MD
Contact
support@mydailydoctor.com
Maarten Lansberg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion