ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05309148Updated Apr 4, 2022

Oculomotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Using Visual Feedback in Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Training on eye tracker based device and Training with a neuropsychologist in Stroke, Oculomotor; Disorder and Attention Disturbances, sponsored by Federal Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Russian Federation Ministry of Health. Status unknown at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-04.

Sponsored by Federal Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Russian Federation Ministry of Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
30 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Investigators will test the effectiveness of oculomotor cognitive training using eye tracker-based device during rehabilitation course in patients with a degree of disability no more than 3 points on a scale Rankin.

Read the detailed description

After a stroke, a wide range of neurological disorders can occur. One of them is impairments of the visual-oculomotor system in 8-31% of cases. Such patients experience loss of visual fields, hemianopia, tunnel vision, diplopia. All this causes great difficulties for returning to everyday life, as well as to professional activity. The eye tracking method allows to diagnose and evaluate the effectiveness of training aimed at improving the functioning of the saccadic system, reducing the volume of visual deficit. Currently, eye tracking is represented by a variety of technological solutions, but not all of them are used in the clinic.

The aim of the study is the application of an eye tracking-based device in cerebral stroke survivors for the correction of oculomotor disorders and visual attention functions.

Stroke patients participate in the study in Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia. The study has been conducted since January, 10 and was approved by a local ethic committee and followed principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients stay in a 24-hour hospital and undergo a rehabilitation course. For 3 weeks, patients receive daily training on the C-Eye Pro device, AssisTech Sp. z. o. o, Poland. The patients interact with the device only by using eye movements. Participants undergo a primary assessment of cognitive functions (memory, thinking skills, language, visual-spatial and communicative functions). According to the results of the diagnosis, participants are offered a scheme of correctional training and secondary assessment at the end of the training. Correction training consists, firstly, of 10-minute exercise at the beginning of each session, aimed at improving visual functions and attention. Patients have to follow the spontaneously moving object. The result is evaluated qualitatively using heat and scanpath maps. Secondly, the correctional training includes a block of neurorehabilitation (simple cognitive exercises similar to the tasks presented in assessment).

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Oculomotor; Disorder
  • Attention Disturbances

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Eye tracking
  • Visual feedback
  • Cognitive functions
  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is close to the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Russian Federation Ministry of Health is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • signed consent
  • at least 3 points on the Rankin scale;
  • the presence of disorders of the visual-oculomotor system, visual attention;
  • understanding and following instructions; stable vegetative and hemodynamic parameters;
  • on the MOOCA scale >22;
  • patients should be fully examined for the underlying and concomitant disease (examination by a neurologist, ophthalmologist, physiotherapist);

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 4, 5 points on the Rankin scale;
  • unstable hemodynamics;
  • time after stroke is less than 2 weeks;
  • presence of epileptic activity;
  • serious ophthalmological disorders (for example, partial atrophy of the optic nerve);
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Training on eye tracker based device

    Patients will undergo a primary diagnostics of cognitive functions (memory, thinking skills, language, visual-spatial and communicative functions) and an diagnostics of the visual attention index on an eye tracker-based device. Based on the results of the diagnosis, participants will be offered a scheme of correctional training and secondary diagnostics at the end of training. Correctional training on an eye tracker-based device consists, firstly, of a 10-minute exercise at the beginning of each lesson aimed at improving visual functions and attention. Patients had to follow a spontaneously moving object. Secondly, correctional training includes a block of neurorehabilitation (simple cognitive exercises similar to the tasks presented in the assessment).

    Behavioral: Training on eye tracker based device

  • Active comparator
    Training with a neuropsychologist

    Patients will undergo primary and secondary diagnostics on an eye tracker-based device, then participants will have a conventional correctional training with a neuropsychologist according to an individual correction plan.

    Behavioral: Training with a neuropsychologist

  • Active comparator
    Training on eye tracker based device and with a neuropsychologist

    Patients will undergo primary and secondary diagnostics and correctional training on an eye tracker-based device, in the same time participants will have a conventional correctional training with a neuropsychologist according to an individual correction plan.

    Behavioral: Training on eye tracker based device and with a neuropsychologist

Interventions

  • BehavioralTraining on eye tracker based device

    The intervention is based on the principle of visual biofeedback. The patient sees where his gaze is and can objectively assess and correct his visual error.

  • BehavioralTraining with a neuropsychologist

    The intervention is based on classical neuropsychological techniques aimed at correcting oculomotor disorders and improving visual attention (blank, psychometric, etc.)

  • BehavioralTraining on eye tracker based device and with a neuropsychologist

    This is combination of the first and second interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Consciousness Test

    It is necessary to monitor the emerging stimuli (red circles) and keep eyes in the center of each of them. The quantitative indicator of visual attention as a percentage will be measured.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

  2. Cognitive function scale: memory scale

    Diagnostics of memory functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

  3. Cognitive function scale: language scale

    Diagnostics of language functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

  4. Cognitive function scale: visual-spatial scale

    Diagnostics of visual-spatial functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

  5. Cognitive function scale: communicative scale

    Diagnostics of communicative functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

  6. Cognitive function scale: thinking skills scale

    Diagnostics of thinking skills functions. Scale is evaluated as a percentage. (min - 0%, max - 100%), the higher score means better performance

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

  7. Assessment of a neuropsychologist

    Screening for cognitive impairment: MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), the results vary between 0 and 30 points. A score of 26 points or more is considered the norm. The lower the score, the worse the result

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

  8. Assessment of a neuropsychologist

    Qualitative assessment of neuropsychological examination data (Luria-Nebraska neuropsychological battery)

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency
    Moscow, 117513, Russian Federation
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2022, 11 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2022
First posted
Apr 4, 2022
StartActual
Jan 10, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 20, 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 20, 2024
Last update
Apr 4, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05309148
Lead sponsor
Federal Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Russian Federation Ministry of Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 4, 2022
Start date
Jan 10, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 4, 2022

Study contacts

Galina Ivanova, Prof
Contact
reabilivanova@mail.ru
+7(499) 280-35-50
Alina Aizenshtein
Contact
alinaaiz@yandex.ru
+79104082769
Marina Shurupova, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical Biological Agency

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion