An interventional study of Heat therapy and Thermoneutral water immersion in Aging, sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.
Sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study aims to determine the effects of \~12 weeks of repeated hot water immersion ("heat therapy") vs. thermoneutral water immersion on blood pressure and vascular function in late middle-life to older (≥40 years) adults. The study also aims to determine the effects of \~12 weeks of heat therapy on fluid cognitive and cerebrovascular function.
Advancing age is the primary risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD), which remain the leading cause of death in the developed world. The key process that links aging to increased risk of CVD is increases in systolic blood pressure and the development of arterial dysfunction (i.e., impaired endothelial function and arterial stiffening).
Passive heat therapy, in the form of repeated use of hot baths and saunas, has been used by several cultures for centuries; however, the physiological benefits are only now being elucidated. For example, recent studies have found that lifelong habitual sauna use is associated with considerably reduced risk of all-cause mortality, sudden cardiac death, CVD-related death. In addition, 8-10 weeks of hot water immersion in young adults has been shown to improve endothelial function and reduces arterial stiffness and blood pressure. Therefore, the investigators expect heat therapy to similarly improve blood pressure and vascular function in middle-life and older adults who are at greater risk of CVD.
Aging is also the primary risk factor for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, as well as mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Above-normal systolic blood pressure (SBP; ≥115 mmHg) further increases risk of dementias, due, in part, to SBP-associated cerebrovascular dysfunction, i.e., impaired cerebral blood flow regulation. Accordingly, midlife and older adults with above-normal SBP are at the highest risk for cognitive decline driven by vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementias in this age group. Excessive reactive oxygen species-induced oxidative stress and reductions in nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability within the cerebral vasculature likely mediate cerebrovascular dysfunction with aging and contribute to MCI and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in those with above-normal SBP.
University of Colorado, Boulder is the lead sponsor of 88 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ECG (electrocardiogram)
A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
DSM diagnostic criteria
The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
BMI (body mass index)
Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.
What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hot water immersion \~3x per week for 12 weeks
Other: Heat therapy
Thermoneutral water immersion \~3x per week for 12 weeks
Other: Thermoneutral water immersion
36 sessions (\~3x per week for 12 weeks) of hot water immersion in 40°C water, sufficient to raise body core temperature to 38.5°C, and 12 weeks of follow-up.
36 sessions (\~3x per week for 12 weeks) of thermoneutral water immersion in 36°C water to prevent changes in body core temperature \>0.2°C, and 12 weeks of follow-up.
Change in casual systolic blood pressure from baseline to 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of heat therapy, and 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up.
Casual brachial artery systolic blood pressure, measured in triplicate (and averaged)
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure from from baseline to 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of heat therapy, and 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up.
Brachial artery systolic blood pressure measured over 24 hours with an ambulatory monitor
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation from baseline to 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of heat therapy, and 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up.
Measure of endothelial function
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity from baseline to 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of heat therapy, and 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up.
Measure of large elastic artery stiffness
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in carotid artery beta-stiffness index from baseline to 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks of heat therapy, and 4 and 12 weeks of follow-up.
Measure of large elastic artery stiffness
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks
Safety of heat therapy, as assessed by recording incidence of adverse events
Safety, i.e., risk to the subject, will be assessed by recording incidence of adverse events, which will be defined as any heat-related symptom or event (e.g., lightheadedness, low SBP or high HR) that results in the subject either sitting up early (if previously fully submerged) or being removed from the tub early.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 months
Tolerability of heat therapy, as assessed by the rate at which enrolled subjects drop out due to adverse events.
Tolerability of heat therapy, i.e., the degree to which overt adverse effects can be tolerated by our subjects, will be assessed by the rate at which enrolled subjects drop out due to adverse events.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 months
Feasibility for implementation of heat therapy, as assessed using a validated 12-item implementation questionnaire ("Feasibility for Implementation Survey")
Feasibility for implementation of heat therapy: the acceptability (the extent to which heat therapy is attractive or agreeable), appropriateness (how strongly heat therapy fits the consumers' needs), and feasibility (the extent to which heat therapy can be performed practically and successfully) of heat therapy assessed using a validated 12-item implementation questionnaire (5-point Likert scale; 1 = low feasibility; 5 = high feasibility).
Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Change in fluid cognitive function from baseline to 12 weeks of heat therapy.
Measure of fluid cognitive function via NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in middle cerebral artery mean velocity to hypercapnia from baseline to 12 weeks of heat therapy.
Measure of cerebrovascular function. Mean velocity will be measured using transcranial doppler ultrasound of the middle cerebral artery.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in total resting cerebral blood flow from baseline to 12 weeks.
Measure of cerebrovascular function. Blood flow measured in mL/minute using duplex ultrasound of the internal carotid artery and the vertebral artery. Blood flow will be calculated from measurements of blood velocity and artery diameter acquired during a 60 second recording of the internal carotid artery and a 60 second recording of the vertebral artery.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in cerebrovascular pulsatility index from baseline to 12 weeks.
Measure of cerebrovascular stiffness.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in cerebrovascular oxidative stress baseline to 12 weeks.
Measure of cerebrovascular function.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in cerebrovascular nitric oxide bioavailability from baseline to 12 weeks.
Measure of cerebrovascular function.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 12 weeks
Plan to share: No
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Colorado, Boulder