CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05300555TASK-POAFUpdated Mar 29, 2022

Cost-effectiveness Analysis Between Two Anticoagulation Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation in the Postoperative Period of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Rivaroxaban 20 MG Oral Tablet and Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation New Onset, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-29.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2021, registered Mar 2022).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a common intervention in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The presence of new postoperative atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter (POAF) occurs in 15-40% of patients undergoing this procedure, with a high rate of complications, including increased hospital length of stay, with a consequent increase in the costs. In addition, the presence of POAF increases the rate of thromboembolic events such as stroke and mortality in the short and long term.

Anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF) lato sensu is already a well-established therapy in patients at high risk, defined by CHADS-VASC greater than or equal to 2. The use of direct-acting anticoagulants (DOACS) is standard therapy for those patients. In the POAF scenario, there is a recommendation for anticoagulation in high-risk patients for at least 30 days, however, despite being an entity with a poor prognosis in the short and long term, it is an undertreated entity. At present, there is no evidence of anticoagulant treatment of POAF with DOACS, and warfarin is the standard therapy. Warfarin is a drug that needs laboratory control of prothrombin time (PT) and anticoagulation bridge with other anticoagulants, usually using heparin and enoxaparin. We believe that because warfarin is the standard drug in this scenario, it is not prescribed on a regular basis, since it increases costs, length of hospital stay and is less effective than DOACS in AF lato sensu.

Thus, the research project intends to compare the cost-effectiveness, assessed by QALY, related to the warfarin prescription strategy associated with bridge anticoagulation versus the rivaroxaban prescription in patients who presented POAF with a minimum duration of 12 hours or AF that requires intervention. Medications will be started during hospitalization. After randomization, anticoagulant medication will be started within 24 hours. The patient will be reassessed in 30 days and if there is no evidence of maintenance of AF, the anticoagulant medication will be discontinued and the standard treatment for CAD will be maintained. Secondary outcomes will be: clinical outcomes, such as: (1) Death; (2) stroke; (3) myocardial infarction (MI); (4) Readmission; (5) Systemic embolization; (6); Surgical reintervention; (6) Bleeding using the ISTH score; (7) Infection. The safety outcome will be the bleeding assessment according to the bleeding score of the ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis).

Considering that POAF is a prevalent entity and associated with a worse prognosis in the short and long term, as well as despite recommendations for guidelines to keep these patients anticoagulated, it is noted that the prescription of anticoagulation at hospital discharge is low. Considering that there is no clear evidence in studies on the use of DOAC in this population, we understand that the search for medications that lead to better cost-benefit, as well as better dosage and bleeding rates not lower than the use of warfarin, could lead to a higher rate prescribing anticoagulants for these patients, reducing costs, clinical and mortality outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation New Onset

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ANTICOAGULANTS
  • CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT
  • ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
  • POST OPERATIVE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
  • COST-EFECTIVENESS
  • ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY AFTER NEW ONSET POST OPERATIVE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • New atrial/flutter fibrillation / flutter lasting more than 12 hours in the postoperative period of CABG
  • Individuals in both sex over the age of 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to sign the free and informed consent form
  • Contraindication to anticoagulant therapy
  • Renal dysfunction with eGFR less than 30ml / min / 1.73m² or dialysis therapy
  • Patients with previous AF
  • Pregnancy
  • Concomitant valve surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rivaroxaban group

    After randomization, the patient will start medication (rivaroxaban 20mg per day or 15mg per day if eGFR between 30 and 50ml/min/1,73m²) within 24 hours. The medication will be prescribed up to 30 days after hospital discharge and if there is no clinical, electrocardiographic and Holter evidence of AF, the medication will be discontinued

    Drug: Rivaroxaban 20 MG Oral Tablet

  • Experimental
    Warfarin group

    After randomization, the patient will start medication within 24 hours. Bridge with heparin or enoxaparin is recommended. The INR target is between 2,0 and 3,0. The medication will be prescribed up to 30 days after hospital discharge and if there is no clinical, electrocardiographic and Holter evidence of AF, the medication will be discontinued

    Drug: Warfarin

Interventions

  • DrugRivaroxaban 20 MG Oral Tablet

    After randomization, the patient will start medication (rivaroxaban 20mg per day or 15mg per day if eGFR between 30 and 50ml/min/1,73m²) within 24 hours. The medication will be prescribed up to 30 days after hospital discharge and if there is no clinical, electrocardiographic and Holter evidence of AF, the medication will be discontinued

    Also known as: Rivaroxaban

  • DrugWarfarin

    After randomization, the patient will start medication within 24 hours. Bridge with heparin or enoxaparin is recommended. The INR target is between 2,0 and 3,0. The medication will be prescribed up to 30 days after hospital discharge and if there is no clinical, electrocardiographic and Holter evidence of AF, the medication will be discontinued

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness between rivaroxaban and warfarin group

    The primary outcome will be the cost-effectiveness, assessed by QALY, of the treatments in both therapeutic groups (rivaroxaban and warfarin) during the hospital stay with follow-up for 30 days after hospital discharge.

    Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bleeding according to ISTH bleeding score

    Security outcome

    Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge

  2. Secondary outcome

    (1) Death; (2) stroke; (3) MI; (4) Readmission; (5) Systemic embolization; (6); Surgical reintervention; (6) Bleeding using the ISTH score; (7) Infection;

    Time frame: 30 days after hospital discharge

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Heart Institute - University of São Paulo
    São paulo, Sao Paulo 05403000, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05300555
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Responsible party
Carlos Vicente Serrano Jr (PHD, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2022
Start date
Jan 5, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2022
Completion
Nov 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 29, 2022

Study contacts

Eduardo Lima, Doctor
Contact
eduglima@yahoo.com.br
+55 11 26615352

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion