CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05299008Updated Jan 30, 2024

The Effect of Bethanechol on Tracheobronchomalacia

An observational study in Tracheobronchomalacia, sponsored by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-30.

Sponsored by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2024, 2 years 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Aug 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this study is to determine if work of breathing estimated using swing Edi will be improved following initiation of bethanechol in infants with tracheobronchomalacia. The investigators hypothesize that work of breathing will be improved in infants with tracheobronchomalacia estimated by a 20% mean decrease in swing Edi following initiation of bethanechol.

Read the detailed description

Tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) is characterized by dynamic airway collapse resulting from flaccidity of smooth trachealis muscles, and the incidence in infants has been estimated to be as high as 16-50%. Tracheal collapse results in an increase in work of breathing (WOB) which leads to prolonged ventilatory support, increased caloric needs, and prolonged hospitalization. Clinical signs of increased WOB include nasal flaring, increased use of accessory muscles, and paradoxical movements of the rib cage and abdominal wall. Compared with infants with normal airways, infants with TBM have a higher resistive WOB and require increased respiratory support to help attenuate the respiratory work.

Currently, there are no pharmacologic treatment options approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of TBM. Animal models have shown that muscarinic agonists may improve the tone of the trachealis muscle and airway mechanics. These physiologic improvements have led to the rationale behind use of the long-acting muscarinic agonist, bethanechol, in the treatment of children with tracheomalacia despite no large trials to demonstrate efficacy. By improving trachealis tone and airway mechanics, infants may benefit from an overall decrease in their resistive WOB leading to improved clinical outcomes.

Measurement of actual WOB can be difficult, invasive, and not easily achieved in neonates, however it can be estimated. One method that has been successfully used to estimate WOB in neonates is by swing electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) by neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). Swing Edi use in NAVA is the difference between the resting tonic activity of the diaphragm (Edi min) and the peak activity of the diaphragm (Edi max) measured by an Edi catheter. By using Swing Edi as a marker for WOB, the investigators propose a methodology to evaluate a physiologic improvement in infants after starting a pharmacologic treatment for TBM.

Though increased WOB is the result of decreased trachealis tone and tracheal collapse, the most accurate method of identifying airway collapse is by direct visualization of the airways. Bronchoscopy is able to give qualitative and semi quantitative impressions of airway collapsibility and has consistently demonstrated a highly favorable safety profile in infants. By performing bronchoscopy before and after bethanechol initiation a direct change may be noted from medical management.

As such, the investigators hypothesize that WOB estimated by swing Edi and tracheal tone identified by direct visualization bronchoscopy will be improved following initiation of bethanechol in infants with tracheobronchomalacia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tracheobronchomalacia

Keywords

  • bethanechol
  • swing Edi
  • Bronchoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Inpatient infants in a level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants with a diagnosis of tracheobronchomalacia by dynamic computed tomography and showing > 50% cross-sectional diameter collapse at 40 to 60 post menstrual age and for whom will be treatment with bethanechol in level IV center Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with diagnosis of tracheobronchomalacia by dynamic computed tomography with \< 50% cross-sectional diameter collapse at 40 to 60 post menstrual age, or infants in which the medical team has not made the decision to start bethanechol.
  • Patients with fixed tracheomalacia or bronchomalacia due to external compression of airways.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Infants with diagnosis of tracheobronchomalacia treated with bethanechol

    Infants with a diagnosis of tracheobronchomalacia by dynamic computed tomography and showing \> 50% cross-sectional diameter collapse at 40 to 60 post menstrual age

    Drug: Bethanechol

Interventions

  • DrugBethanechol

    Infants whom will be treated with bethanechol for tracheobronchomalacia in level IV center Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

    Also known as: bethanechol chloride

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary aim of this study is to determine if work of breathing estimated using swing Edi will be improved following initiation of bethanechol in infants with tracheobronchomalacia.

    Swing Edi data will be collected continuously by downloading ventilator trends from the 24 hours prior to initiation of bethanechol in infants and subsequently downloaded every 48-72 hours for 7 days after starting bethanechol.

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Determining if there is a direct visual change in trachealis tone determined by bronchoscopy following bethanechol initiation in infants with tracheobronchomalacia.

    A baseline flexible bronchoscopy prior to starting of bethanechol followed by a repeat flexible bronchoscopy at days 7-14 of post bethanechol treatment.

    Time frame: Day 1 and then at 7-14 days

  2. Evaluating for change in regional impedance variation by use of Electrical Impedance Tomography

    Electrical Impedance Technology (EIT) is a tool used to monitor regional changes in ventilation and lung mechanics.

    Time frame: Collect EIT data 24 hours prior to starting bethanechol and on day 7 after starting bethanechol treatment.

  3. Evaluating for change in a Pulmonary Severity Score

    Evaluate a change in a Pulmonary Severity Score (Madden 2005). The pulmonary severity score is defined as the fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) x (support) x (medications).

    Time frame: Data collected 40 weeks to 60 weeks postmenstrual age

  4. Investigating for change in number of apnea/bradycardia/desaturation events, pain/sedation scores, and doses of sedation medications following bethanechol initiation in infants with tracheobronchomalacia.

    Data collected 40 weeks to 60 weeks postmenstrual age

    Time frame: Daily from 40 weeks to 60 weeks postmenstrual age

  5. Assessing for side effects of bethanechol treatment such an increase in secretions, wheezing, or an increase in loose stools.

    Collect the documented effects 7 days before and 14 days after bethanechol initiation.

    Time frame: 21 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Arkansas Children's Hospital
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Greenholz SK, Hall RJ, Lilly JR, Shikes RH. Surgical implications of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr Surg. 1987 Dec;22(12):1132-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(87)80723-6. PubMed 3440899 ↗
  • Downing GJ, Kilbride HW. Evaluation of airway complications in high-risk preterm infants: application of flexible fiberoptic airway endoscopy. Pediatrics. 1995 Apr;95(4):567-72. PubMed 7700760 ↗
  • Gunatilaka CC, Higano NS, Hysinger EB, Gandhi DB, Fleck RJ, Hahn AD, Fain SB, Woods JC, Bates AJ. Increased Work of Breathing due to Tracheomalacia in Neonates. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Oct;17(10):1247-1256. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-162OC. PubMed 32579852 ↗
  • Wagner EM, Jacoby DB. Methacholine causes reflex bronchoconstriction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Jan;86(1):294-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.1.294. PubMed 9887142 ↗
  • Bass R, Santiago M, Smith L, Quinlan C, Panitch H, Giordano T, Piccione J. (2018). Bethanechol in Tracheomalacia: Two Case Series and a Review of the Literature. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology. 31:3, 180-183. https://doi.org/10.1089/ped.2018.0880
  • Bhutani VK, Koslo RJ, Shaffer TH. The effect of tracheal smooth muscle tone on neonatal airway collapsibility. Pediatr Res. 1986 Jun;20(6):492-5. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198606000-00002. PubMed 2872649 ↗
  • Panitch HB, Keklikian EN, Motley RA, Wolfson MR, Schidlow DV. Effect of altering smooth muscle tone on maximal expiratory flows in patients with tracheomalacia. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1990;9(3):170-6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950090309. PubMed 1980538 ↗
  • Hysinger E, Friedman N, Jensen E, Zhang H, Piccione J. Bronchoscopy in neonates with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the NICU. J Perinatol. 2019 Feb;39(2):263-268. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0280-y. Epub 2018 Dec 5. PubMed 30518799 ↗
  • Madan A, Brozanski BS, Cole CH, Oden NL, Cohen G, Phelps DL. A pulmonary score for assessing the severity of neonatal chronic lung disease. Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):e450-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1293. PubMed 15805348 ↗
  • Nealon E, Rivera BK, Cua CL, Ball MK, Stiver C, Boe BA, Slaughter JL, Chisolm J, Smith CV, Cooper JN, Armstrong AK, Berman DP, Backes CH. Follow-up after Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus Occlusion in Lower Weight Infants. J Pediatr. 2019 Sep;212:144-150.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.05.070. Epub 2019 Jun 28. PubMed 31262530 ↗
  • Lee J, Kim HS, Jung YH, Shin SH, Choi CW, Kim EK, Kim BI, Choi JH. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants: a randomised phase II crossover trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Nov;100(6):F507-13. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308057. Epub 2015 Jul 15. PubMed 26178463 ↗
  • Bergeron M, Cohen AP, Cotton RT. The Management of Cyanotic Spells in Children with Oesophageal Atresia. Front Pediatr. 2017 May 15;5:106. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00106. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28555179 ↗
  • Masters IB, Zimmerman PV, Pandeya N, Petsky HL, Wilson SB, Chang AB. Quantified tracheobronchomalacia disorders and their clinical profiles in children. Chest. 2008 Feb;133(2):461-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2283. Epub 2007 Nov 7. PubMed 17989148 ↗
  • Wallis C, Alexopoulou E, Anton-Pacheco JL, Bhatt JM, Bush A, Chang AB, Charatsi AM, Coleman C, Depiazzi J, Douros K, Eber E, Everard M, Kantar A, Masters IB, Midulla F, Nenna R, Roebuck D, Snijders D, Priftis K. ERS statement on tracheomalacia and bronchomalacia in children. Eur Respir J. 2019 Sep 28;54(3):1900382. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00382-2019. Print 2019 Sep. PubMed 31320455 ↗
  • DeBoer EM, Prager JD, Kerby GS, Stillwell PC. Measuring Pediatric Bronchoscopy Outcomes Using an Electronic Medical Record. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 May;13(5):678-83. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-576OC. PubMed 26816220 ↗
  • Su YT, Chiu CC, Lai SH, Hsia SH, Lin JJ, Chan OW, Chiu CY, Tseng PL, Lee EP. Risk Factors for Tracheobronchomalacia in Preterm Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Front Pediatr. 2021 Jun 25;9:697470. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.697470. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34249821 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05299008
Lead sponsor
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Charles Preston Pugh (Neonatology Fellow, Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 28, 2022
Start date
Aug 11, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 30, 2024

Study contacts

Charles P Pugh, MD
Contact
cpugh2@uams.edu
9013352402
David Matlock, MD
Contact
dmatlock@uams.edu
3184589097
Charles P Pugh, MD
principal investigator · Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion