CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05298241Updated Apr 22, 2024

Interactive Hand-grip Strength Game in Critically Illness Patients

An interventional study of Hand-grip Strength Game in Critical Illness, sponsored by Taipei Medical University. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-22.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2021, registered Jan 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) are an unexpected event that consequently causes physical and psychological problems, including ICU acquired weakness, delirium, sleep disruptions, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Such consequences may lead to prolonged ICU stay, increased health care, and elevated medical costs. Therefore, mitigating physical and psychological distresses by providing timely effective interventions has become a top concern to optimize critically ill patients' recovery. Investigators aim to design an interactive hand-grip game to improve patients' upper limbs activities and psychological health in patients requiring intensive care.

Read the detailed description

Patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs) are an unexpected event that consequently causes physical and psychological problems, including ICU acquired weakness, delirium, sleep disruptions, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Such consequences may lead to prolonged ICU stay, increased health care, and elevated medical costs. Therefore, mitigating physical and psychological distresses by providing timely effective interventions has become a top concern to optimize critically ill patients' recovery. Investigaters aim to design a interactive hand-grip game to improve patients' upper limbs activities and psychological health in patients requiring intensive care. This will be a two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial which randomly assign patients into the game group and usual care group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • intensive care unit
  • Hand-grip Strength
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is below the median of 90 across 979 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University is the lead sponsor of 245 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥ 20 years
  • Having clear consciousness
  • Independently able to mobilize to complete the intervention and communicate in Chinese
  • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) 24 between +1 to -1 if using sedatives

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspect neurological deficits
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Orthopedic injuries with contraindications to mobilize
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hand-grip Strength Game

    Participants will receive a hand-grip strength game for 5-20 minutes twice a day for consecutive three days.

    Other: Hand-grip Strength Game

  • No intervention
    routine care

    The control group will not involve hand-grip strength game at night.

Interventions

  • OtherHand-grip Strength Game

    Interactive Handgrip Strength Game for ICU patients receiving the game and to assess the impact on psychological.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline on anxiety

    Anxiety will be measured by Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS21). DASS21 of anxiety has 7 items of the questions are used to measure the severity of anxiety. The total score should be multiplied by 2 range from 0-42, if score\>7 is associated with anxiety. The higher score means more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: The 1 day of enrollment, and 3th day of ICU.

  2. Change from baseline on Post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD)

    The PTSD is assessed by Post-traumatic Stress Syndrome 10-question inventory (PTSS-10).The measurement involved 10 items and each item is rated using a seven-point Likert scale (1 "never" to 7 "always").

    Time frame: The 1st, and 3th day of ICU.

  3. Change of Delirium incidence

    The delirium event is assessed by Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU(CAM-ICU)

    Time frame: Every 8 hours during ICU stay up to 3 days

  4. Change from baseline on depression

    Depression will be measured by Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS21). DASS21 has 7 items of the questions are used to measure the severity of depression. The total score should be multiplied by 2 range from 0-42, if score\>9 is associated with depression. The higher score means more severe depression.

    Time frame: The 1 day of enrollment, and 3th day of ICU.

  5. Change from baseline on stress

    Stress will be measured by Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS21). DASS21 has 7 items of the questions are used to measure the severity of stress. The total score should be multiplied by 2 range from 0-42, if score\>14 is associated with anxiety. The higher score means more severe stress.

    Time frame: The 1 day of enrollment, and 3th day of ICU.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes of Pain

    Pain is assessed by using the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). The possible total score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 8 (maximum pain).

    Time frame: Everyday during ICU stay up to 3 days

  2. Change from baseline on sleep quality

    Sleep quality in ICU is assessed by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire(RCSQ). The mean of total score is 0-100. The higher score means the better sleep quality.

    Time frame: The 1st, and 3th day of ICU.

  3. ICU acquired weakness

    The ICU acquired weakness is assessed by Medical Research Council (MRC).The scale for grading the strength (i.e., 0, total palsy to 5, normal strength) in three functional muscle groups of each extremity (shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, and wrist extension for upper limb; hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion for lower limb), with mean MRC-scores of \<4 (antigravity strength).26,35 Summation of scores gives MRC-sums core, ranging from 0 to 60. The sum score also reliably identifies significant ICU-acquired weakness (\< 48).

    Time frame: The 1st day of ICU.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare
    Taipei, 110, Taiwan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05298241
Lead sponsor
Taipei Medical University
Responsible party
Hsiao-Yean Chiu (Associated professor, Taipei Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 28, 2022
Start date
Oct 21, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 21, 2022
Completion
Dec 1, 2022
Last update
Apr 22, 2024

Study contacts

Hsiao-Yean Chiu, PhD
principal investigator · Taipei Medical University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion