CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05296850Updated Apr 7, 2022

Immediate Effects of Kinesio Taping and Manual Release in Young Adults With Pes Planus

An interventional study of Manual Release and Kinesio Taping in Pes Planus, sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-07.

Sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pes planus is a postural deformity seen with decreased medial longitudinal arch (MLA) height and this causes intense stress on the plantar fascia. Pes planus may affect individuals' activities of daily living, their productivity in occupational environments, and the risk of injury and performance in sports; It has also been reported that it may cause different musculoskeletal diseases such as plantar fasciitis, medial tibial stress syndrome, patellofemoral disorders and back pain in the future. Many clinical methods are used as a treatment for pes planus and most treatments involve supporting an overstretched plantar fascia and weakened MLA. The aim of the study is to investigate the immediate effects of kinesio taping and manual release on lower extremity performance in young adults with pes planus.

Read the detailed description

This study is a randomized controlled trial, will be carried out on volunteer individuals with pes planus aged between 18-25, studying at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University. Evaluation of parameters and inclusion criteria, kinesio taping and manual release applications will be made by the Physiotherapist. Individuals who meet the inclusion criteria, who volunteered to participate in the study and signed the consent sheet will be randomly divided into two groups, Group 1 [Manual Release (MR)] and Group 2 [Kinesio Taping (KT)]. A simple randomization method will be used with opaque sealed envelopes containing "1" or "2". Group allocation will be performed by an independent therapist, not involved in the study. All individuals will be evaluated with timed up-and-go test, heel rise test, 10-meter walking test, and functional reach test before and after the intervention. Manual release will be applied to group 1 after the evaluation and the evaluations will be repeated immediately the end of the application. Kinesio taping will be applied to group 2 after the evaluation and the evaluations will be repeated 45 minutes after the end of the application.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pes Planus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pes planus
  • Kinesio Taping
  • Manual release
  • Plantar fascia
03

In context

Flatfoot

168 studies on the registry are indexed under Flatfoot; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 37 across 121 interventional studies indexed under Flatfoot.

Browse Flatfoot studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University is the lead sponsor of 229 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals who volunteer to participate in the study
  • Individuals with bilateral pes planus
  • Individuals who have not had any ankle injury in the last 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with severe visual and hearing impairment
  • Individuals with congenital shortness or deformity in their lower extremities
  • Individuals who have had any lower extremity surgery
  • Individuals with hallux valgus, hallux rigidus, or calcaneal epine
  • Individuals with any musculoskeletal problem other than pes planus and systemic, neurological problems
  • Individuals with chronic ankle instability
  • Individuals who have had problems walking for the last 6 months
  • Individuals who have received treatment for pes planus in the last 6 months and use insoles
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Manual release group

    Manual release will perform with plantar fascia and flexor hallucis longus stretching and tissue mobilization. Stretching/mobilization will applied for approximately 3 minutes.

    Other: Manual Release

  • Experimental
    Kinesio taping group

    Two techniques will be used in kinesio taping application; first technique is the gastrocnemius muscle inhibition technique and the plantar fascia ligament correction technique and other technique is the transverse arch ligament correction technique.

    Other: Kinesio Taping

Interventions

  • OtherManual Release

    Individuals are placed in the prone position with their knees extended. The calcaneus is kept in eversion while maintaining talocrural dorsiflexion. As the toes are stretched in dorsiflexion, the therapist slides the big toe distally and proximally along the plantar fascia and flexor hallucis longus. Soft tissue mobilization depth will be applied according to the patient's tolerance and reactivity.

  • OtherKinesio Taping

    In the first technique, an "I" tape will be applied on the plantar surface of the foot from the metatarsal heads to the popliteal fossa. First, the middle of the band is attached to the inferior of the calcaneus as the first anchor, then the ankle is dorsiflexed and the upper part of the band is applied with 15-25% tension until the popliteal fossa. The plantar fascia is placed in a stretched position by dorsiflexing the ankle and fingers, and the ends of the tape, which is divided into 4 parts, are applied separately to the metatarsal heads with 75-100% tension. In the second technique, the application is made with an "I" tape. The initial anchor starts from the dorsal aspect of the 5th metatarsal on the lateral aspect of the foot. Then, the tape passes to the medial side of the foot with 75-100% tension and is adhered to the medial side of the foot and ankle over the navicular. The end anchor is applied without tension.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Timed up and go test (TUG)

    The timed up and go test is used to assess functional mobility. The test involves getting up from a standard chair without armrests, walking around a cone 3 m in front of the chair, and returning to the original sitting position as quickly as possible without running. The test is started with the researcher's verbal "go" instruction and the time to complete the test is recorded. After a familiarization attempt, three recorded exercises are performed with one-minute rest intervals. The fastest of three attempts is saved.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at immediately after one-session treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Heel rise test (HRT)

    The endurance of the gastro-soleus muscle complex is evaluated with the heel rise test. The number of toe-ups in one minute is determined when the knees of the subjects are in extension. The results are recorded as the number of repetitions.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at immediately after one-session treatment

  2. 10 meter walk test, walking speed

    Walking speed is evaluated with the 10 meter walking test. The test is performed at a comfortable walking pace on a 10 m walk, 14 m walkway for the start (2 m) and finish (2 m). Measurements are repeated 3 times and the average time is recorded in seconds.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at immediately after one-session treatment

  3. 10 meter walk test, cadence

    Cadence is evaluated with the 10 meter walking test. The test is performed at a comfortable walking pace on a 10 m walk, 14 m walkway for the start (2 m) and finish (2 m). During the 10-meter walk, the number of steps is recorded.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at immediately after one-session treatment

  4. Functional reach test (FUT)

    Balance is assessed with the functional reach test. In the application of the test, the individual is asked to keep his feet open and close to a parallel shoulder-width wall. The individual have a measuring stick attached to the wall at shoulder level. The individual is asked to punch his hand and flex his shoulder 90 degrees without touching the wall, and bring the third metacarpal finger joint of his hand to the starting point of the measuring stick.The individual is guided to reach as far as possible without taking a step, without lifting his heels, without bending his knees, and the end point is recorded. The difference between the starting position and the ending position is measured in cm. The test is repeated three times and the average of the three measurements is recorded.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at immediately after one-session treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
    Ankara, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Govind, S., Singh, K., Mahalingam, K. ve SREE Vamsi, G. To Compare the Effectiveness of Taping and Arch Support on the Flexible Flat Foot on a Random Population. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2020
  • Okamura K, Fukuda K, Oki S, Ono T, Tanaka S, Kanai S. Effects of plantar intrinsic foot muscle strengthening exercise on static and dynamic foot kinematics: A pilot randomized controlled single-blind trial in individuals with pes planus. Gait Posture. 2020 Jan;75:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.030. Epub 2019 Sep 29. PubMed 31590069 ↗
  • Tas S, Unluer NO, Korkusuz F. Morphological and mechanical properties of plantar fascia and intrinsic foot muscles in individuals with and without flat foot. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018802482. doi: 10.1177/2309499018802482. PubMed 30270752 ↗
  • Angin S, Mickle KJ, Nester CJ. Contributions of foot muscles and plantar fascia morphology to foot posture. Gait Posture. 2018 Mar;61:238-242. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.022. Epub 2018 Mar 20. PubMed 29413791 ↗
  • Filardi V. Flatfoot and normal foot a comparative analysis of the stress shielding. J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):820-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.002. eCollection 2018 Sep. Erratum In: J Orthop. 2020 Dec 15;24:293. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.006. PubMed 30140126 ↗
  • Wang JS, Um GM, Choi JH. Immediate effects of kinematic taping on lower extremity muscle tone and stiffness in flexible flat feet. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Apr;28(4):1339-42. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1339. Epub 2016 Apr 28. PubMed 27190479 ↗
  • Montgomery G, McPhee J, Paasuke M, Sipila S, Maier AB, Hogrel JY, Degens H. Determinants of Performance in the Timed Up-and-Go and Six-Minute Walk Tests in Young and Old Healthy Adults. J Clin Med. 2020 May 21;9(5):1561. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051561. PubMed 32455757 ↗
  • Gunay S, Karaduman A, Ozturk BB. Effects of Aircast brace and elastic bandage on physical performance of athletes after ankle injuries. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(1):10-6. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.2981. PubMed 24643094 ↗
  • Soulard J, Vaillant J, Balaguier R, Vuillerme N. Spatio-temporal gait parameters obtained from foot-worn inertial sensors are reliable in healthy adults in single- and dual-task conditions. Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88794-4. PubMed 33986307 ↗
  • Tedla JS, Asiri F, Alshahrani MS, Sangadala DR, Gular K, Rengaramanujam K, Mukherjee D. Reference Values of Functional and Lateral Reach Test Among the Young Saudi Population: Their Psychometric Properties and Correlation with Anthropometric Parameters. Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jul 31;25:5683-5689. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916443. PubMed 31365521 ↗
  • Baltacı, G. Bantlama. (N. Ozunlu Pekyavas, Ed.). Ankara: Hipokrat Yayıncılık.2020; 194-195
  • Cleland JA, Abbott JH, Kidd MO, Stockwell S, Cheney S, Gerrard DF, Flynn TW. Manual physical therapy and exercise versus electrophysical agents and exercise in the management of plantar heel pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Aug;39(8):573-85. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3036. PubMed 19687575 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05296850
Lead sponsor
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Responsible party
Ertuğrul Demirdel (Assistant Professor, Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 25, 2022
Start date
Feb 16, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 16, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 16, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 7, 2022

Study contacts

Tuğba Ulusoy, PT
principal investigator · Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Ertuğrul Demirdel, PhD
principal investigator · Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion