ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05293847Updated Jun 21, 2022

Postural Based Telerehabilitation in Mechanic Neck Pain

An interventional study of Telerehabilitation exercises and postural skills in Neck Pain, Telerehabilitation and Postural; Defect, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-21.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2021, registered Mar 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
107
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It has been reported that staying in the same posture for a long time causes musculoskeletal system problems, and the use of mobile phones and other electronic devices continuously, especially in the internet age, causes postural problems in many people. Physiotherapy applications including strengthening, stretching, yoga, pain-oriented applications, and behavioral treatments are performed for an ideal posture to regulate postural problems. When the literature is examined, it has been seen that the studies carried out after the Covid 19 pandemic have developed especially in the direction of telerehabilitation, but there is a need for studies showing the effect of exercise applications developed for individuals with mechanical neck pain. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of 12-week telerehabilitation on posture, energy consumption, and performance in individuals with mechanical neck pain.

Read the detailed description

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences. All evaluations were performed in the university physiotherapy laboratories. All of the participants were informed about the study and provided written informed consent. This study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration, its later amendments.110 people over the age of 18 were included in the study. Posture-oriented exercises were applied online 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Postural measurements, performance, and energy consumption levels were determined for each participant before and after the intervention. Craniovertebral angle and shoulder angle were measured with a smartphone application and muscle shortness was measured with clinical tests among postural measurements. Performance measurement was evaluated with the 6-minute walking test, and energy consumption was evaluated with the Physiological Cost Index. Individuals diagnosed with mechanical neck pain who applied to the university's wellness center for exercise between September 2021 and December 2021 were determined by physiotherapists who are experts in their fields. A cross-sectional selection of 110 individuals met the inclusion criteria. This study was conducted with assessments made before and after posture-based telerehabilitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain
  • Telerehabilitation
  • Postural; Defect

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • neck pain
  • telerahabilitation
  • posture
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,259 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 256 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 107 is above the median of 52 across 1,026 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 1,001 studies on the registry; 215 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inclusion criteria were being aged 18 years or over,
  • Volunteering to take part in the study,
  • Being a student of online education,
  • without a history of any neurological or orthopedic problem,
  • with resting neck pain (as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale) lasting ≤30 days and that is aggravated by movement without extending distal to the shoulders.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria were neck pain that included inflammatory rheumatological diseases, malignancy, or structural deformity, previous surgery related to the cervical spine,
  • Severe referred pain (greater than 7 on a 0-to-10 Visual Analogue Scale-VAS).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
107 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Telerehabilitation exercises

    Exercises about postural structures on the cervical and thoracal region. Bilateral pectoral stretching, chin tack exercises, cervical isotonic exercises, stretching of the upper trapezius and longus Colli, scapular region strengthening, shoulder capsular stretching, Wand exercises for 12 weeks and 3 times a week.

    Behavioral: Telerehabilitation exercises and postural skills

Interventions

  • BehavioralTelerehabilitation exercises and postural skills

    12 week based postural exercises and skills were applied to participants. The exercises were done 3 times a week. The exercises about cervical and thoracal region strengthening and stretching of muscles and structures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postural Assessments

    Eye angle, craniovertebral angle,shoulder angle

    Time frame: 5 minute

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance

    6 minute walk test

    Time frame: 10 minute

Other outcomes

  1. Energy Consumption

    Physiologic Cost Index

    Time frame: 15 minute

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Tezel Yıldırım Şahan
    Ankara, 06018, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arshadi R, Ghasemi GA, Samadi H. Effects of an 8-week selective corrective exercises program on electromyography activity of scapular and neck muscles in persons with upper crossed syndrome: Randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport. 2019 May;37:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 21. PubMed 30928841 ↗
  • Joshi S, Balthillaya G, Neelapala YVR. Thoracic Posture and Mobility in Mechanical Neck Pain Population: A Review of the Literature. Asian Spine J. 2019 Jun 3;13(5):849-860. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0302. Print 2019 Oct. PubMed 31154701 ↗
  • Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Cassidy JD, Guzman J, Cote P, Haldeman S, Ammendolia C, Carragee E, Hurwitz E, Nordin M, Peloso P. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S46-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.010. PubMed 19251074 ↗
  • Lohman EB, Pacheco GR, Gharibvand L, Daher N, Devore K, Bains G, AlAmeri M, Berk LS. The immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation on pain and biochemical markers in females with acute non-specific mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Sep;27(4):186-196. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1553696. Epub 2018 Dec 11. PubMed 30935335 ↗
  • de Araujo Cazotti L, Jones A, Roger-Silva D, Ribeiro LHC, Natour J. Effectiveness of the Pilates Method in the Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1740-1746. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.018. Epub 2018 May 9. PubMed 29752907 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2021 to primary completion in Nov 2021, 2 months.

Of 690 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neck Pain, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 698 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 8, 2022
First posted
Mar 24, 2022
StartActual
Sep 5, 2021
Primary completionActual
Nov 10, 2021
CompletionActual
Feb 20, 2022
Last update
Jun 21, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05293847
Responsible party
Tezel Yıldırım Şahan (Director, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 24, 2022
Start date
Sep 5, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 10, 2021
Completion
Feb 20, 2022
Last update
Jun 21, 2022

Study contacts

Tezel Y Şahan, pHD
study director · University of Health science

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion