CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05288686Updated May 10, 2023

Use of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) in Sentinel Lymph Node Detection for Breast Cancer

An interventional study of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in Breast Cancer and Sentinel Lymph Node, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-10.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2024, 2 years 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 3 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2018, registered Mar 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
282
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is mandatory during breast cancer operation for disease staging and treatment. The localization of sentinel lymph node is by the injection of radioisotope and blue dye, which is the gold standard. However the use of radioisotope and blue dye are associated with specific drawbacks. Superparamagnetic iron oxide is a magnetic tracer which is FDA-approved for sentinel lymph node localization. The hypothesis of this study is superparamagnetic iron oxide can replace the conventional dual mapping of radioisotope and blue dye in the detection of sentinel lymph nodes for early breast cancers.

Read the detailed description

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has replaced axillary dissection as the standard of care in clinically node negative breast cancer. Lymphatic mapping with radioisotope and blue dye were most studied tracer agents and their combination was shown to give the highest nodal identification rate and lowest false negative rate. However the use of radioisotope is strictly monitored due to its radioactivity and blue dye is associated with potential allergic reactions and skin tattoo. Superparamagnetic iron oxide is non-radioactive. It gives an audible signal with the magnetometer and a brown color as visual cue. It has demonstrated comparable nodal identification rate with the conventional method in multiple non-inferiority trials in Europe and the USA. There was no randomized controlled trial for a head-to-head comparison between these mapping technique. The hypothesis of this study is superparamagnetic iron oxide alone can replace the conventional dual mapping of radioisotope and blue dye.

Previous literature suggested the nodal detection rate for conventional method and SPIO was around 97%. Assuming a non-inferiorly limit of 5%, with a power of 80% and 5% significance level, the number of patients per treatment arm should be 144. We will need a sample size of 300 patients, taking into account a loss to follow-up of \<5%.

All patients recruited will be provided full explanation of the study and written voluntary consents will be obtained before randomization.

All data will be prospectively collected by dedicated research assistant and computerized into a database. All statistical analysis will be performed with Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) version 24. Missing information will be marked and significant missing data will be excluded from analysis. Chi-square test will be used to compare discrete variables and student T test or Mann Whitney U test for continuous variables. P value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Personal data will be obtained by principal investigator and dedicated research assistant to allow analysis of the results. These data will be anonymous, only identified by the first three letters of patient's name. The file will be encrypted and stored in the study institution. All the information will be solely for research purpose and kept strictly confidential.

Research subjects will be provided with phone contacts for any questions or emergency related to the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Sentinel Lymph Node

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • superparamagnetic iron oxide
  • sentinel lymph node detection rate
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 282 is above the median of 72 across 9,302 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,262 studies on the registry; 340 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients with clinical T1-3N0 invasive ductal carcinoma or invasive lobular carcinoma planned for breast conservative surgery or mastectomy, with sentinel lymph node biopsy
  • Patients planned for upfront operation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hypersensitivity to dextran compounds, iron or blue dye
  • Patients with iron overload disease
  • Pregnant or lactating patients
  • Patients with pacemaker or other implantable metallic devices in chest wall or prosthesis in shoulder
  • Mentally incompetent patients
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
282 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SPIO arm

    Superparamagnetic iron oxide guided sentinel lymph node mapping

    Procedure: sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure

  • Active comparator
    Control arm

    Conventional radioisotope and blue dye guided sentinel lymph node mapping

    Procedure: sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure

Interventions

  • Proceduresentinel lymph node biopsy procedure

    Patient received respective tracer injection and sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in the operation theatre with the corresponding device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. sentinel lymph node detection rate per patient

    Successful sentinel lymph node localization for each arm

    Time frame: At the time of operation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of sentinel lymph nodes detected

    Number of sentinel lymph nodes detected in each arm

    Time frame: At the time of operation

  2. Duration of sentinel lymph node biopsy

    Duration of sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in each arm

    Time frame: Duration of the operation from incision of axillary fascia to satisfactory nodal basin count

  3. Detection rate of pathologically involved sentinel lymph nodes

    Detection rate of malignant sentinel lymph nodes in each arm

    Time frame: At operation

  4. Duration of skin stain

    Duration of blue stain (from blue dye) and brown stain (from SPIO) in respective arm

    Time frame: post-operative 3 month, 6 month, 12 month and 18 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Hong Kong
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Douek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, Kothari A, Zechmeister K, Brown D, Wyld L, Drew P, Garmo H, Agbaje O, Pankhurst Q, Anninga B, Grootendorst M, Ten Haken B, Hall-Craggs MA, Purushotham A, Pinder S; SentiMAG Trialists Group. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(4):1237-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3379-6. Epub 2013 Dec 10. PubMed 24322530 ↗
  • Thill M, Kurylcio A, Welter R, van Haasteren V, Grosse B, Berclaz G, Polkowski W, Hauser N. The Central-European SentiMag study: sentinel lymph node biopsy with superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) vs. radioisotope. Breast. 2014 Apr;23(2):175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 29. PubMed 24484967 ↗
  • Pinero-Madrona A, Torro-Richart JA, de Leon-Carrillo JM, de Castro-Parga G, Navarro-Cecilia J, Dominguez-Cunchillos F, Roman-Santamaria JM, Fuster-Diana C, Pardo-Garcia R; Grupo de Estudios Senologicos de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Mamaria (SESPM). Superparamagnetic iron oxide as a tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: A comparative non-inferiority study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;41(8):991-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 12. PubMed 25997792 ↗
  • Rubio IT, Diaz-Botero S, Esgueva A, Rodriguez R, Cortadellas T, Cordoba O, Espinosa-Bravo M. The superparamagnetic iron oxide is equivalent to the Tc99 radiotracer method for identifying the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 15. PubMed 25466980 ↗
  • Houpeau JL, Chauvet MP, Guillemin F, Bendavid-Athias C, Charitansky H, Kramar A, Giard S. Sentinel lymph node identification using superparamagnetic iron oxide particles versus radioisotope: The French Sentimag feasibility trial. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;113(5):501-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.24164. Epub 2016 Jan 12. PubMed 26754343 ↗
  • Ghilli M, Carretta E, Di Filippo F, Battaglia C, Fustaino L, Galanou I, Di Filippo S, Rucci P, Fantini MP, Roncella M. The superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer: a valid alternative in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jul;26(4). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12385. Epub 2015 Sep 14. PubMed 26365441 ↗
  • Karakatsanis A, Christiansen PM, Fischer L, Hedin C, Pistioli L, Sund M, Rasmussen NR, Jornsgard H, Tegnelius D, Eriksson S, Daskalakis K, Warnberg F, Markopoulos CJ, Bergkvist L. The Nordic SentiMag trial: a comparison of super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles versus Tc(99) and patent blue in the detection of sentinel node (SN) in patients with breast cancer and a meta-analysis of earlier studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jun;157(2):281-294. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3809-9. Epub 2016 Apr 27. PubMed 27117158 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05288686
Lead sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Responsible party
MAN Chi Mei Vivian (Honorary Clinical Assistant Professor, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 21, 2022
Start date
Jul 24, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 29, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 10, 2023

Study contacts

Ava Kwong, Professor
study director · university

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion