CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05278377Updated Oct 17, 2022

Effectiveness of the Apprenti en Action School-based Culinary Program on 9-10-year-old Children's Food Literacy

An observational study in Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Eating Behavior, sponsored by Universite de Moncton. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 11 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-17.

Sponsored by Universite de Moncton · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
8 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In New Brunswick, Canada, only 53% of Kindergarten to Grade 5 students reported eating five or more vegetables and fruits per day in 2016-2017. Low intakes of vegetables and fruits are a marker for poor nutrition, which may impair the growth and cognitive development of children and adolescents and may put them at risk of developing certain non-communicable diseases earlier in life. It has been suggested that increasing children's food literacy may be an effective way of promoting healthier diets, including increasing vegetable and fruit intake among students. Since children spend most of their waking hours at school, this may be a key setting for promoting food literacy and healthy eating behaviors. Previous studies have found that culinary interventions that include taste testing and nutrition education may improve students' food literacy and vegetable and fruit consumption. Therefore, this quasi-experimental study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a school-based culinary program titled "Apprenti en Action" on primary school children's food literacy, breakfast, and vegetable and fruit consumption. Specifically, data were collected among Grade 5 students from ten francophone elementary schools, five of which received the "Apprenti en Action" program and five who did not. The "Apprenti en Action" program consisted of six, one-hour culinary workshops given once a week, at school, during school hours. Data on students' food literacy, breakfast, vegetable, and fruit consumption were collected via online questionnaires before and after the program. In addition to collecting quantitative data, qualitative data were collected from program participants and their parents to assess their perceptions of "Apprenti en Action".

Read the detailed description

This study used a quasi-experimental design. Quantitative data from Grade 5 students from five francophone elementary schools in the province of New Brunswick, Canada, who participated in the "Apprenti en Action" culinary program were compared to those of Grade 5 students from five other elementary schools who did not receive the program. "Apprenti en Action" consists of six, one-hour culinary workshops offered once a week during school hours. The program aims to teach students how to read and follow recipes, prepare and cook various foods using various culinary techniques, and apply food safety practices. Students are also taught the basics of healthy food, nutrition, and cooking.

A questionnaire was developed based on previously-validated questionnaires and it measured vegetable and fruit consumption, breakfast consumption, concepts of food literacy including food and cooking skills as well as nutrition knowledge. All students will complete this self-administered online questionnaire before and after the program. Multilevel regressions will be used to assess the effectiveness of the culinary class on students' food literacy, breakfast, vegetable, and fruit consumption. Additionally, focus groups with children who participated in the "Apprenti en Action" program and their parents will be invited to share their perceptions of the program and how/if it has impacted the children's food literacy and eating behaviors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fruit and Vegetable Intake
  • Eating Behavior

Keywords

  • School
  • Food skills
  • Cooking skills
  • Food literacy
  • Culinary program
  • Cooking program
  • Nutrition knowledge
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants are Grade 5 students enrolled in one of the 10 recruited francophone elementary schools in the province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be enrolled in a Grade 5 or mixed Grade 4 and 5 class

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Apprenti en Action (intervention group)

    "Apprenti en Action" consists of six, one-hour culinary workshops offered once a week during school hours.

    Behavioral: "Apprenti en Action" program

  • Control group

    Students in the control group do not receive the "Apprenti en Action" program.

Interventions

  • Behavioral"Apprenti en Action" program

    The "Apprenti en Action" program aims to teach students how to read and follow recipes, prepare and cook various foods using various culinary techniques, and apply food safety practices. Students are also taught the basics of healthy food, nutrition, and cooking.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in vegetable and fruit consumption at the end of the program

    Students' consumption of vegetables and fruits was measured using two questions from the provincial New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey (New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey, 2016). These questions asked how many vegetables and fruits they had eaten the day before the survey. This was measured using a scale from 0 (None), to 7 (7 or more).

    Time frame: Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)

  2. Change from baseline in breakfast consumption at the end of the program

    Students' breakfast consumption was assessed based on one question from the provincial New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey (New Brunswick Student Wellness Survey, 2016). Students were asked to report how often they ate breakfast during the last school week. This question was scored from 0 (none) to 7 (7 days of the week).

    Time frame: Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)

  3. Change from baseline in cooking skills at the end of the program

    Cooking skills include all skills needed to prepare and cook foods, including cooking methods and food preparation techniques, and were measured using 18 questions. Among the questions, one was assessed with a five-point, downwards Likert-type scale (e.g. "Rate your ability to make the different breakfast foods"), and 17 questions were multiple-choice questions (e.g. "How long does it take to cook hard- and soft-boiled eggs?"). All cooking skills included in the questionnaire were skills that children were expected to have practiced during the program. The questionnaire was based on three previously-validated tools (Skeaff et al. 2020, Dean et al. 2021, Lavelle et al. 2017). Specifically, these questions measured children's ability to prepare breakfast, to use various cooking methods, to use kitchen equipment, to apply food safety practices, and to use various food preparation techniques. In total, a score ranging from 0 to 83 points was possible for this outcome variable.

    Time frame: Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)

  4. Change from baseline in nutrition knowledge at the end of the program

    Nine multiple-choice questions were used to assess children's nutrition knowledge, including their understanding of a balanced plate and food safety. These questions were inspired by those used in Skeaff et al.'s (2020) validated questionnaire. In total, a score of 0 to 9 points was possible for this outcome variable.

    Time frame: Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)

  5. Change from baseline in food skills at the end of the program

    Food skills represent the knowledge and skills required to choose and prepare food according to available resources and to cook balanced meals. They include meal planning, following a recipe, using leftovers, making and following a grocery list, reading nutrition labels, etc. Of the three questions used to measure food skills, two questions were multiple-choice questions (e.g. "The above picture is of French toast. What are three ingredients you need for French toast?") and one was a five-point downwards Likert-type scale ("From this list, indicate how good you are at performing these actions."). These questions were based on previously-validated questionnaires (Skeaff et al. 2020, Lavelle et al. 2017). In total, a score of 0 to 53 points was possible for this outcome variable.

    Time frame: Baseline and Endpoint (Week 6)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Student perception of the program

    Students' perception of the program will be measured via virtual semi-structured focus groups. Two 40-45 minute sessions with 8-10 students per group are anticipated. Students will be asked to share their perception of the program's impact on their knowledge, skills, appreciation for healthy foods, and self-efficacy, as well as the strengths, weaknesses, and perceived relevancy of the program.

    Time frame: One week after the end of the program (Week 7)

  2. Parent perception of the program

    Students' parents' perception of the program will be measured via virtual semi-structured focus groups. Two 40-45 minute sessions with 8-10 parents per group are anticipated. Parents will be asked to share their perception of the program's impact on their children's knowledge, skills, appreciation for healthy foods, and self-efficacy, as well as the strengths, weaknesses, and perceived relevancy of the program.

    Time frame: One week after the end of the program (Week 7)

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Universite de Moncton
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9, Canada
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Lavelle F, McGowan L, Hollywood L, Surgenor D, McCloat A, Mooney E, Caraher M, Raats M, Dean M. The development and validation of measures to assess cooking skills and food skills. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 2;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0575-y. PubMed 28865452 ↗
  • Dean M, Issartel J, Benson T, McCloat A, Mooney E, McKernan C, Dunne L, Brennan SF, Moore SE, McCarthy D, Woodside JV, Lavelle F. CooC11 and CooC7: the development and validation of age appropriate children's perceived cooking competence measures. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 30;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01089-9. PubMed 33516243 ↗
  • Miller LM, Cassady DL. The effects of nutrition knowledge on food label use. A review of the literature. Appetite. 2015 Sep;92:207-16. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 27. PubMed 26025086 ↗
  • Brown, J. (2019). Nutrition through the life cycle (7e ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Conseil de la santé du Nouveau-Brunswick. (2017). Sondage sur le mieux-être des élèves du Nouveau-Brunswick au niveau primaire de la maternelle à la 5e année (2016-2017) (p. 19). https://csnb.ca/sites/default/files/publications-attachments/sondage-mieux-etre-des-eleves-au-primaire-2016-2017-fr.pdf
  • Dudley DA, Cotton WG, Peralta LR. Teaching approaches and strategies that promote healthy eating in primary school children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 25;12:28. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0182-8. PubMed 25889098 ↗
  • Evans CE, Christian MS, Cleghorn CL, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;96(4):889-901. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.030270. Epub 2012 Sep 5. PubMed 22952187 ↗
  • Skeaff, S., Govan, A., & Skeaff, M. (2020). A Practical Kitchen-Based Validation of the Food Skills Section of a Food Literacy Questionnaire for 9-10 Year Old Children.
  • Maynard M, Gunnell D, Ness AR, Abraham L, Bates CJ, Blane D. What influences diet in early old age? Prospective and cross-sectional analyses of the Boyd Orr cohort. Eur J Public Health. 2006 Jun;16(3):316-24. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki167. Epub 2005 Sep 1. PubMed 16141299 ↗
  • Nathan N, Wolfenden L, Butler M, Bell AC, Wyse R, Campbell E, Milat AJ, Wiggers J. Vegetable and fruit breaks in Australian primary schools: prevalence, attitudes, barriers and implementation strategies. Health Educ Res. 2011 Aug;26(4):722-31. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr033. Epub 2011 May 13. PubMed 21571836 ↗
  • Neumark-Sztainer D, Wall M, Larson NI, Eisenberg ME, Loth K. Dieting and disordered eating behaviors from adolescence to young adulthood: findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Jul;111(7):1004-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.04.012. PubMed 21703378 ↗
  • Wang Y, Bentley ME, Zhai F, Popkin BM. Tracking of dietary intake patterns of Chinese from childhood to adolescence over a six-year follow-up period. J Nutr. 2002 Mar;132(3):430-8. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.3.430. PubMed 11880567 ↗
  • Krebs-Smith SM, Heimendinger J, Patterson BH, Subar AF, Kessler R, Pivonka E. Psychosocial factors associated with fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Health Promot. 1995 Nov-Dec;10(2):98-104. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.2.98. PubMed 10160052 ↗
  • Karpouzis F, Lindberg R, Walsh A, Shah S, Abbott G, Lai J, Berner A, Ball K. Evaluating OzHarvest's primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: protocol for a pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2021 May 22;21(1):967. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10302-0. PubMed 34022839 ↗
  • Harris G, Mason S. Are There Sensitive Periods for Food Acceptance in Infancy? Curr Nutr Rep. 2017;6(2):190-196. doi: 10.1007/s13668-017-0203-0. Epub 2017 Apr 29. PubMed 28596932 ↗
  • Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, Marsh T, Islam N, Zakeri I, Honess-Morreale L, deMoor C. Squire's Quest! Dietary outcome evaluation of a multimedia game. Am J Prev Med. 2003 Jan;24(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00570-6. PubMed 12554024 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request made to the principal investigator.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05278377
Lead sponsor
Universite de Moncton
Collaborators
New Brunswick Innovation Foundation
Responsible party
Stephanie Ward (Assistant professor, Universite de Moncton) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 14, 2022
Start date
Mar 15, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2022
Completion
Jun 30, 2022
Last update
Oct 17, 2022

Study contacts

Stephanie A Ward, PhD, RD
principal investigator · Universite de Moncton

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion