ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04605224Updated Oct 28, 2020

Effectiveness of a Culinary Class on Food Literacy and Eating Behaviours of Francophone High School Students

An observational study in Eating Behavior and Fruit and Vegetable Intake, sponsored by Universite de Moncton. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-28.

Sponsored by Universite de Moncton · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,003
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As the frequency of meals taken outside the home increases, children and youth have less opportunities to develop their food and cooking skills. Consequently, poor food literacy can increase dependence on highly processed foods which generally contain high amounts of calories, fat, sugar and sodium. Past studies have shown positive impacts of culinary-based interventions on adolescents' nutrition knowledge, attitudes, eating behaviours and cooking skills. However, most of these interventions were led outside of the school context, which limits their reach. Since adolescents spend most of their waking hours in school, providing culinary classes in school may be an effective way of promoting adolescents' food literacy. Therefore, the aim of this quasi-experimental study was to assess the effectiveness of an optional culinary class on high school students' food literacy and eating behaviours. Specifically, data were collected among students from five francophone high schools who were enrolled in a culinary class. These students were compared to those who were enrolled in a social studies class. Both classes were 55-70 minutes in duration and were provided five times per week over a full 18-week semester. Data on students' food literacy and eating behaviours were collected via questionnaires during the first and last week of the semester.

Read the detailed description

This study used a quasi-experimental design. Students from five francophone high schools in the province of New Brunswick, Canada, who were enrolled in an optional culinary class were compared to students from those same schools who were enrolled in a social studies class. The culinary class is a hands-on course which teaches students how to measure and weigh ingredients, read and follow recipes, apply various food preparation, cooking and assembly techniques, as well as prepare meals. In contrast, the social studies class is a mandatory theory-based course which teaches students how to maintain positive relationships, how to become a productive member of society and how to make responsible and informed choices related to their health. Both classes are 55-70 minutes in duration and are provided daily over an 18-week semester.

A questionnaire was developed based on two previously validated food literacy questionnaires and assessed food and cooking skills, as well as eating behaviours. This pen and paper questionnaire was completed by students in both the culinary class and the social studies class during the first and last week of the semester (September 2019 and January 2020). Multilevel regressions will be used to assess the effectiveness of the culinary class on students' food literacy and eating behaviours as compared to the social studies class.

02

Conditions studied

  • Eating Behavior
  • Fruit and Vegetable Intake

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • School
  • Cooking class
  • Culinary class
  • Food literacy
  • Cooking skills
  • Food skills
03

In context

Feeding Behavior

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Feeding Behavior; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,003 is above the median of 183 across 270 observational studies indexed under Feeding Behavior.

Browse Feeding Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Universite de Moncton is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants are students enrolled in the Culinary class or Social Studies class in the fall of 2019, in the 5 recruited francophone high schools in the province of New Brunswick, Canada.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be enrolled in either the culinary class or social studies class in the fall semester of 2019

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,003 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Culinary class (intervention group)

    The culinary class is 55-70 minutes in duration and is offered daily, Monday to Friday, over an 18-week semester (September 2019 to January 2020).

    Behavioral: Culinary class

  • Social studies class (control group)

    The social studies class is 55-70 minutes in duration and is offered daily, Monday to Friday, over an 18-week semester (September 2019 to January 2020).

Interventions

  • BehavioralCulinary class

    This hands-on, optional course teaches students how to measure and weigh ingredients, read and follow recipes, apply various food preparation, cooking and assembly techniques, as well as prepare meals, as per the provincial curriculum

    Also known as: Cuisine professionnelle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in cooking skills at the end of the school semester

    The validated 14-item cooking skills question assesses how good students feel they are at performing each cooking skill on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (very good) with the option "Never/rarely do it" (0) given as an option. Change is measured by the difference between the total score (0 to 98) obtained at the end of the semester (18 weeks) minus the total score obtained at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 18

  2. Change from baseline in food skills at the end of the school semester

    The validated 12-item food skills question assesses how good students feel they are at performing each food skill on a scale from 1 (very poor) to 7 (very good) with the option "Never/rarely do it" (0) given as an option. Change is measured by the difference between the total score (0 to 84) obtained at the end of the semester (18 weeks) minus the total score obtained at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 18

  3. Change from baseline in eating behaviours at the end of the school semester

    Eating behaviours were measured using two separate questions. The first question, based on the NB Student Wellness Survey, assessed how often students consumed breakfast in the previous week (0 pt = never to 7 pt = 7 times). The second question was based on a previously validated questionnaire. This question assessed how often students did 6 different eating related behaviours. Response options ranged from "never or rarely" (0 pt) to "every day" (3 pts), for a maximum total score of 18 points. These two questions were combined to provide a total score ranging from 0 to 25 points. Change is measured by the difference between the total score (0 to 25) obtained at the end of the semester (18 weeks) minus the total score obtained at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 18

  4. Change from baseline in fruit and vegetable intake at the end of the school semester

    Intake was measured using 7 items of a previously validated questionnaire. One question assessed how many servings of vegetables and how many servings of fruit they usually eat each day. Response options ranged from "I don't eat vegetables/fruit" (0 pt) to "more than 5 servings per day" (5 pts). Another question assessed whether students had eaten or were planning on eating various types of foods at breakfast, lunch or snack that day. One point was given every time a vegetable or fruit product was checked, for a maximum of 9 points. A third question assessed whether they had consumed the listed fruit or vegetable the previous day. Scores ranged from 0 to 4 points. The sum of these questions provided a total possible score of 25 points. Change is measured by the difference between the total score (0 to 25) obtained at the end of the semester (18 weeks) minus the total score obtained at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 18

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universite de Moncton
    Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lavelle F, McGowan L, Hollywood L, Surgenor D, McCloat A, Mooney E, Caraher M, Raats M, Dean M. The development and validation of measures to assess cooking skills and food skills. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 2;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0575-y. PubMed 28865452 ↗
  • Wilson AM, Magarey AM, Mastersson N. Reliability and relative validity of a child nutrition questionnaire to simultaneously assess dietary patterns associated with positive energy balance and food behaviours, attitudes, knowledge and environments associated with healthy eating. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Jan 29;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-5. PubMed 18226268 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request made to the principal investigator.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 28, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04605224
Lead sponsor
Universite de Moncton
Responsible party
Stephanie Ward (Adjunct Professor, Universite de Moncton) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2020
Start date
Sep 10, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2020
Completion
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
Oct 28, 2020

Study contacts

Stephanie A Ward, PhD, RD
principal investigator · Universite de Moncton

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion