ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05277519VibraLCAUpdated Jul 7, 2026

Neuroplasticity After Proprioceptive Rehabiliation

An observational study in Stroke, Hemiparesis and Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
56
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sequences of muscle tendon vibrations allow to reproduce the sensory feedback during movement like locomotion and kinaesthesia. It is known that such a treatment promotes motor recovery after stroke assuming that it enhances neuroplasticity. The aim of the research is to study the activity in cerebrospinal circuitry to evaluate the neuroplastic changes during and after instrumented proprioceptive rehabilitation relying on sequences of muscle vibration in subacute stroke stages.

Read the detailed description

Randomized control trial : 28 patients with active vibrations vs. 28 patients with sham stimulation Subacute phase : D15 to 6 months after stroke or patients with traumatic brain injury with similar semiology as stroke (hemiparesis) Measure at baseline : Electrophysiological investigations (EMG,EEG, MRI, clinical evaluation) Treatment of 5 weeks with 3 sessions of vibrations or sham a week Evaluation at mid time (electrophysiology and clinical examinations) Final examination (electrophysiology, MRI and clinical examination)

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis
  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Neuroplasticity
  • Electrophysiology
  • MRI
  • Neurophysiology
  • Muscle vibration
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 56 is below the median of 152 across 1,968 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France is the lead sponsor of 378 studies on the registry; 81 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

56 patients randomly affected to the experimental group receiving active vibration or sham

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • hemiparesis at least transient in lower limb following an acquired brain injury (stroke or traumatic brain injury)
  • French spoken
  • Affiliated to a French social insurance
  • No previous traumatic, vascular or neurodegenerative injuries
  • Having presented during the acute phase or presenting a motor deficit of one of the lower limbs
  • Presenting an absence of autonomy of walking at the entrance of the rehabilitation department
  • In the sub-acute phase, i.e. from 15 days to 6 months after the accident
  • Presenting moderate cognitive disorders allowing them to understand instructions and give their consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • strong cognitive disorders
  • maintenance of justice, tutelage, legal guardianship
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Outpatients who do not have weekly follow-up in the rehabilitation department
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
56 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceVibrations

    Sequenced muscle vibrations during 30 min., 3 times a week during 5 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Baseline EMG

    H-reflex and reciprocal inhibition

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  2. Baseline EEG

    SEP and resting state activity

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  3. EMG change from baseline after 2-week treatment

    H-reflex and reciprocal inhibition

    Time frame: Evaluation during the 3rd week of treatment

  4. EEG change from baseline after 2-week treatment

    SEP and resting state activity

    Time frame: Evaluation during the 3rd week of treatment

  5. EMG change after the 5-week treatment

    H-reflex and reciprocal inhibition

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

  6. EEG change after the 5-week treatment

    SEP and resting state activity

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Baseline MD

    Evaluation of white matter integrity along the corticospinal tract by calculating the mean diffusivity (MD) evaluated from diffusion MRI

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  2. Baseline FA

    Evaluation of white matter integrity along the corticospinal tract by calculating the fraction of anisotropy (FA) evaluated from diffusion MRI

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  3. Baseline Muscle Strength

    score to Medical Research Council scale

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  4. Muscle Strength change from baseline after 2-week treatment

    score to Medical Research Council scale

    Time frame: Evaluation during the 3rd week of treatment

  5. Muscle Strength change from baseline after 5-week treatment

    score to Medical Research Council scale

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

  6. Baseline Spasticity

    score to Modified Ashworth scale

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  7. Spasticity change from baseline after 2-week treatment

    score to Modified Ashworth scale

    Time frame: Evaluation during the 3rd week of treatment

  8. Spasticity change from baseline after 5-week treatment

    score to Modified Ashworth scale

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

  9. Baseline sensorimotor function

    subscore for lower limbs to Fugl meyer assessment

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  10. Sensorimotor function change from baseline after 2-week treatment

    subscore for lower limbs to Fugl meyer assessment

    Time frame: Evaluation during the 3rd week of treatment

  11. Sensorimotor function change from baseline after 5-week treatment

    subscore for lower limbs to Fugl meyer assessment

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

  12. Baseline Balance

    Score to Berg balance scale

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  13. Balance change from baseline after 2-week treatment

    Score to Berg balance scale

    Time frame: Evaluation during the 3rd week of treatment

  14. Balance change from baseline after 5-week treatment

    Score to Berg balance scale

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

  15. Baseline walking

    score to 10-m walking test

    Time frame: Evaluation at baseline (4 days before treatment)

  16. Walking from baseline after 2-week treatment

    score to 10-m walking test

    Time frame: Evaluation during the 3rd week of treatment

  17. Walking from baseline after 5-week treatment

    score to 10-m walking test

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

  18. Change in MD

    Evaluation of white matter integrity along the corticospinal tract by calculating the mean diffusivity (MD) evaluated from diffusion MRI

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

  19. Change in FA

    Evaluation of white matter integrity along the corticospinal tract by calculating the fraction of anisotropy (FA) evaluated from diffusion MRI

    Time frame: Evaluation 4 days after the end of the 5-week treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 59 months after the start.

Of 835 non-industry observational studies under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 92. This study's planned 59 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 897 studies reached it within 40 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 85.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 16, 2021
First posted
Mar 14, 2022
StartActual
Jun 16, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2027
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05277519
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 14, 2022
Start date
Jun 16, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Veronique Marchand-Pauvert, PhD
Contact
veronique.marchand-pauvert@inserm.fr
+33142161120
Eleonore Bayen, MD, PhD
Contact
eleonor.bayen@aphp.fr
+33142161120
Eleonore Bayen, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Sorbonne University - AP-HP (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion