CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05267080RESPECTUpdated Feb 6, 2026

Registry on Percutaneous Electrochemotherapy

An observational study in Primary Liver Cancer and Secondary Liver Cancer, sponsored by Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Active, not recruiting at 15 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-06.

Sponsored by Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Registry on Percutaneous ElectroChemoTherapy (RESPECT) is a post-market, prospective, non-randomized, observational study aiming at evaluating the effectiveness of percutaneous electrochemotherapy (ECT) for the treatment of liver cancer.

Read the detailed description

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a local tumour ablation technique that uses reversible electroporation to transiently permeabilize the cell membrane in order to increase the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. A major advantage of ECT is that its antitumour efficacy is driven by the chemotherapeutic agent which predominantly targets rapidly-dividing tumour cells, with very little collateral damage on neighbouring structures.

ECT is typically performed using the CLINIPORATOR®, a medical grade pulse generator for clinical electroporation, whose development was funded by the European Commission in an effort to standardize the operating procedures for ECT. The feasibility, safety and efficacy of ECT with the CLINIPORATOR® have been consistently reported for the management of different types of primary and secondary liver cancers: colorectal liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, portal vein tumour thrombosis from hepatocellular carcinoma, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastasis from renal cancer.

While ECT for liver malignancies has been mostly performed intraoperatively, recent studies have successfully used a percutaneous approach. These studies, which were either single-case reports or involved a very limited number of patients (\< 10), have introduced percutaneous ECT as a very promising minimally invasive treatment option for liver cancer, with the obvious benefits of fewer surgical complications, faster recovery and shorter hospitalization. However, results from a larger and more diverse patient population are needed in order to confirm its therapeutic efficacy.

The aim of the RESPECT study is to expand our understanding of percutaneous ECT for primary and secondary liver cancer by 1) substantiating the evidence base for the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous ECT in a large-scale, multi-centric, cross-border sample; and 2) extending the current evidence base regarding percutaneous ECT with appropriately defined follow-up data, as well as information regarding quality of life.

RESPECT is a post-market, prospective, non-randomized, observational study. Patients with any type of liver cancer will be given the possibility to enrol after they are referred to percutaneous ECT by a multidisciplinary tumour board, hence participation to the registry neither affects treatment plan nor influence treatment quality. Patient enrolment will last 3 years, with a follow-up period of 1 year. Data will be collected less than 1 week before treatment (baseline) and at different intervals following treatment (1 day, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and every 6 months until the end of the study). Effectiveness of ECT will be primarily assessed by the status of each treated lesion 12 months after treatment. Overall survival, overall local disease-free survival, hepatic disease-free survival, time to untreatable progression by ECT and vacation from systemic cancer therapy will give further insight into the impact of ECT. Safety will be evaluated based on the occurrence and severity of adverse events associated with the treatment. Quality of life and pain will be documented using questionnaires filled by the patients at the first 3 to 4 follow-ups.

Overall, RESPECT intends to provide healthcare professionals and health authorities with information on percutaneous ECT for liver cancer to help decision-making regarding treatment access and treatment modalities and optimize patient care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Liver Cancer
  • Secondary Liver Cancer
03

In context

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

3,182 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; 954 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 200 across 754 observational studies indexed under Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.

Browse Carcinoma, Hepatocellular studies →

Lead sponsor

Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with primary or secondary liver cancer referred to local ablative treatment by multidisciplinary tumour board and treated with pECT by decision of the interventional radiologist in charge.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Primary or secondary liver cancer
  • Referral to local ablative treatment by multidisciplinary tumour board and decision to treat with pECT by interventional radiologist in charge
  • Planned treatment with pECT using the CLINIPORATOR
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • DeviceCLINIPORATOR

    The CLINIPORATOR is used to perform percutaneous electrochemotherapy on liver tumours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Local Tumour Control

    Based on the tumour status according to mRECIST assessment

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety (in terms of adverse events related to treatment)

    Based on the occurrence of adverse events and their severity according to CTCAE v5.0

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Tumour status (size)

    Based on tumour size

    Time frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)

  3. Tumour status (mRECIST)

    Based on mRECIST assessment

    Time frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)

  4. Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Based on the Quality of Life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 filled by the patients before ECT treatment and at different time intervals following ECT treatment. Quality of life data is measured according to three scales: functional scale, symptom scale and global health. On the functional scale, scores range from 1 to 4, with a score of 1 corresponding to no at all and a score of 4 corresponding to very much. On the symptom scale, scores range from 1 to 4, with a score of 1 corresponding to no at all and a score of 4 corresponding to very much. For global health, the scores range from 1 to 7, with a score of 1 corresponding to either very poor global health or very poor quality of life, and a score of 7 corresponding to either excellent global health or excellent quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Pain assessment

    Based on the pain questionnaire filled by the patients before ECT treatment and at different time intervals following ECT treatment. Severity of pain is graded on a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 corresponding to the most severe pain. Pain frequency is graded from 0 (no pain) to 4 (chronic pain persistent for more than 3 months). Quality of pain is classified into 4 categories: no, somatic, visceral and neuropathic pain.

    Time frame: 1 month

  6. Effectiveness (Survival)

    Survival will be categorized with respect to overall survival, overall local disease-free survival and hepatic disease-free survival

    Time frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)

  7. Effectiveness (Time to untreatable progression by ECT)

    Based on the timeframe until the progressing tumour is not treatable by ECT anymore

    Time frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)

  8. Systemic cancer therapy vacation

    Based on the time frame following ECT treatment during which patients do not need systemic cancer therapy

    Time frame: End of study (maximum 36 months)

  9. Economic aspects

    Based on the duration of hospitalization following ECT treatment

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

15 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier
    Montpellier, France
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
    Paris, France
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
    Paris, France
  • WEGE Klinik
    Bonn, Germany
  • Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig
    Braunschweig, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Halle
    Halle, Germany
  • Helios Park-Klinikum
    Leipzig, Germany
  • University Hospital Regensburg
    Regensburg, Germany
  • University of Szeged
    Szeged, Hungary
  • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
    Milan, Italy
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
    Rome, Italy
  • Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli
    Rome, Italy
  • Vilnius University Hospital Santariškių Klinikos
    Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
    Valencia, Spain
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
    Leeds, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05267080
Lead sponsor
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2022
Start date
Jan 25, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 23, 2026
Completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 6, 2026

Study contacts

Philipp Wiggermann, Prof. Dr.
study chair · Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
Attila Kovács, PD. Dr. med.
study chair · WEGE Klinik, Bonn, Germany
Franco Orsi, Prof.
study chair · European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion