CClinicalTrials.gg
Sign In
CompletedNCT05265910Updated May 3, 2022

A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis

A Phase 4 interventional study of olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7% and loratadine 10 mg in Allergic Conjunctivitis, sponsored by Andover Research Eye Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-03.

Sponsored by Andover Research Eye Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Apr 2022, 4 years 5 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-center, randomized, double-masked, parallel study. In this clinical study, the efficacy comparison between Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength and Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour will be made using the Ora-CAC model, a validated clinical model accepted by regulatory agents for assessing the efficacy of products on the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergic Conjunctivitis
03

In context

Conjunctivitis

361 studies on the registry are indexed under Conjunctivitis; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 58 is below the median of 100 across 299 interventional studies indexed under Conjunctivitis.

Browse Conjunctivitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Andover Research Eye Institute is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Each subject must:

  1. Be at least 18 years of age at Visit 1 of either gender and any race;
  2. Provide written informed consent and sign the HIPAA form;
  3. Be willing and able to follow all instructions and attend all study visits;
  4. Have a history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to a seasonal (grass, ragweed, and/or tree pollen) or perennial (cat dander, dog dander, dust mites, cockroach) allergen as confirmed by an allergic skin test conducted at Visit 1 or within the last 24 months;
  5. Be able and willing to avoid all disallowed medications for the appropriate washout period and during the study (see exclusion 6);
  6. Be able and willing to discontinue wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to Visit 1 and during the study trial period;
  7. (for females capable of becoming pregnant) agree to have urine pregnancy testing performed at screening (must be negative) and exit visit; must not be lactating; and must agree to use a medically acceptable form of birth control throughout the study duration. Women considered capable of becoming pregnant include all females who have experienced menarche and have not experienced menopause (as defined by amenorrhea for greater than 12 consecutive months) or have not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy);
  8. Have a calculated best-corrected visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using an ETDRS chart;
  9. Have a positive bilateral post-CAC reaction (defined as having scores of ≥2 ocular itching and ≥2 conjunctival redness) within 10 (±2) minutes of instillation of the last titration of allergen at Visit 1;
  10. Have a positive bilateral post-CAC reaction (defined as having scores of ≥2 ocular itching and ≥2 conjunctival redness) for at least two out of the first three time points following the challenge at Visit 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Each subject must not:

  1. Have known contraindications or sensitivities to the use of the investigational product or any of its components; 2. Have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, clinically significant blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, pterygium, history of corneal transplantation or a diagnosis of dry eye); 3. Have had ocular surgical intervention within three (3) months prior to Visit 1 or during the study and/or a history of refractive surgery within the past six (6) months; 4. Have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease; 5. Have the presence of an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit; 6. Use any of the following disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to Visit 1 and during the study: 7 Days
  • systemic or ocular H1-antihistamine, H1-antihistamine/mast cell stabilizers, H1-antihistamine-vasoconstrictor drug combinations;
  • decongestants;
  • monoamine oxidase inhibitors
  • all other topical ophthalmic preparations (including artificial tears)
  • lid scrubs;
  • topical prostaglandins or prostaglandin derivatives
  • ocular, topical, or systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, including baby aspirin (81 mg)) 14 Days
  • inhaled, ocular, topical, or systemic corticosteroids or mast cell stabilizers; 45 Days

  • depo-corticosteroids; Note: Currently marketed over-the-counter anti-allergy eye drops (i.e. anti-histamine/vasoconstrictor combination products such as Visine®-A®) may be administered to subjects by trained study personnel at the end of Visits 1, 2 and 4b after all evaluations are completed.

    1. Have any significant illness (e.g. any autoimmune disease requiring therapy, severe cardiovascular disease [including arrhythmias] the investigator feels could be expected to interfere with the subject's health or with the study parameters and/or put the subject at any unnecessary risk (includes but is not limited to: poorly controlled hypertension or poorly controlled diabetes, a history of status asthmaticus, organ transplants, a known history of persistent moderate or severe asthma, or a known history of moderate to severe allergic asthmatic reactions to any of the study allergens; 8. Have received allergy immunotherapy within the last 2 years; 9. Manifest signs or symptoms of clinically active allergic conjunctivitis in either eye at the start of Visits 1, 2, or 3 (defined as the presence of any itching or >1 [greater than 1] redness in any vessel bed); 10. Have a history of glaucoma; 11. Have planned surgery (ocular or systemic) during the trial period or within 30 days after; 12. Have used an investigational drug or medical device within 30 days of the study or be concurrently enrolled in another investigational product trial; 13. Be a female who is currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or lactating.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
58 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength and Placebo tablet

    Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7%) will be administered bilaterally and Placebo tablet will be administered orally (within 5 minutes of eyedrop) at Visits 3 and 4a.

    Drug: olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7% · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Tears Naturale® II and Claritin® Tablet 24-Hour

    Tears Naturale® II will be administered bilaterally and Claritin® Tablet 24-Hour (loratadine 10 mg) will be administered orally (within 5 minutes of eyedrop) at Visits 3 and 4a.

    Drug: loratadine 10 mg · Drug: Tears Naturale

Interventions

  • Drugolopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7%

    Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength (eyedrop)

    Also known as: Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength

  • Drugloratadine 10 mg

    Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour (tablet)

    Also known as: Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour

  • DrugTears Naturale

    Tears Naturale® II (eyedrop)

    Also known as: Tears Naturale® II

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo tablet (tablet)

    Also known as: Placebo tablet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ocular itching 3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3

    Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 3(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 3(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  2. Ocular itching 3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b

    Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 3(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Vi sit 4b.

    Time frame: 3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  3. Ocular itching 5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3

    Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 5(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 5(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  4. Ocular itching 5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b

    Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 5(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  5. Ocular itching 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3

    Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 7(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  6. Ocular itching 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b

    Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 7(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness

    Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  2. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness

    Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  3. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness

    Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  4. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness

    Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  5. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness

    Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  6. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness

    Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  7. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness

    Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  8. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness

    Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  9. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness

    Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  10. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis

    Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  11. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis

    Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  12. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis

    Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  13. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling

    Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  14. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling

    Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  15. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling

    Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  16. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing

    Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  17. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing

    Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  18. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing

    Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  19. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea

    Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  20. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea

    Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  21. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea

    Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  22. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis

    Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  23. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis

    Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  24. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis

    Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  25. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis

    Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  26. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis

    Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  27. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis

    Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  28. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion

    Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  29. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion

    Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  30. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion

    Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject 0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)

  31. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness

    Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  32. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness

    Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  33. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness

    Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  34. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness

    Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  35. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness

    Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  36. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness

    Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  37. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness

    Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  38. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness

    Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  39. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness

    Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  40. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis

    Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  41. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis

    Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  42. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis

    Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  43. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling

    Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  44. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling

    Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  45. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling

    Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  46. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing

    Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  47. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing

    Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  48. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing

    Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  49. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea

    Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  50. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea

    Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  51. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea

    Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  52. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis

    Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  53. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis

    Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  54. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis

    Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  55. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis

    Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  56. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis

    Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  57. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis

    Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  58. Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion

    Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  59. Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion

    Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

  60. Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion

    Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

    Time frame: 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Andover Eye Associates
    Andover, Massachusetts 01810, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05265910
Lead sponsor
Andover Research Eye Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2022
Start date
Dec 14, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 23, 2022
Completion
Apr 23, 2022
Last update
May 3, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies in this condition

Conjunctivitis→

Other studies from this sponsor

Andover Research Eye Institute

Start the discussion