ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05261009Updated May 21, 2024Results posted

PENG Block Versus LP Block for THA Postop Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG) and Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB) in Pain, Postoperative and Hip Pain Chronic, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-21.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
154
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized, double blinded, prospective study is to compare the postoperative analgesia provided by the PENG block to that provided by the LPB for patients undergoing primary anterior approach THA.

Read the detailed description

Regional anesthesia procedures represent a common modality for postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty surgeries (THA). The standard practice many years has been the Lumbar Plexus block (LPB), which anesthetizes the L1-L5 lumbar nerve roots1. While the LPB offers analgesia from the associated sensory block, it also blocks motor fibers, leading to lower extremity weakness that could potentially delay the patient's ability to participate in early physical therapy and may thereby delay discharge. In the past several years, newer regional anesthesia block approaches have been described and investigated in an attempt to provide patients with postoperative analgesia while avoiding associated muscle weakness, facilitating earlier physical therapy participation and discharge. One such nerve block is the peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block, which anesthetizes the articular branches of the femoral, obturator, and accessory obturator nerves providing sensory innervation to the hip joint capsule without consistently causing lower extremity weakness2. Some institutions are utilizing the PENG block to provide postoperative analgesia and facilitate early mobilization. There are currently no prospective studies that directly compare the efficacy of LPB to PENG block for providing postoperative analgesia after THA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Hip Pain Chronic

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 154 is above the median of 75 across 4,457 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,345 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 328 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 249 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • elective primary total hip arthroplasty surgery anterior approach
  • provided informed consent
  • no contraindications to medications used in providing the analgesic blocks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to regional anesthesia, such as an allergy to amide local anesthetics
  • pre-existing coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia \<100,000
  • refusal of analgesic block for pain management
  • presence of an progressive lower extremity neurological deficit
  • localized or systemic infection
  • chronic use of high dose opioid analgesics (defined as daily use greater than 60 mg oxycodone equivalents)
  • pregnant
  • refusal of consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
154 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)

    Those subjects assigned to the PENG treatment arm will receive a PENG block using 20mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine dosed in 5mL increments with negative aspiration beforehand and between each aliquot.

    Drug: Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)

  • Active comparator
    Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)

    Those subjects assigned to the LPB treatment arm will receive a stimulation-based LPB dosed with 20cc of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 dilution epinephrine dosed in 5mL increments with negative aspiration beforehand and between each aliquot.

    Other: Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)

Interventions

  • DrugPeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)

    PENG block for postoperative pain management

  • OtherLumbar Plexus Block (LPB)

    LPB for postoperative pain management

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score

    a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at six hours following block placement. Equivalency will be defined as a difference of less than one point in either direction on the eleven-point NRS pain scale. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

    Time frame: hour 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. NRS Pain Score

    a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 12 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

    Time frame: hour 12

  2. NRS Pain Score

    a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 18 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

    Time frame: hour 18

  3. NRS Pain Score

    a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 24 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

    Time frame: hour 24

  4. Time in Minutes Until Opioid Administration

    Time to first dose of opioid rescue for postoperative pain management - This outcome was evaluated in time to first opioid dose, which was measured in hours - no analysis for mean, median, or any of the others suggested - It was calculated as time of block to time of first opioid dose-hours and minutes.

    Time frame: hour 24

  5. Motor Strength

    straight leg raise at 6 hours after block placed rated on a 0-5 scale with a higher score indicating better movement

    Time frame: hour 6

  6. Distance Ambulated

    Recorded in feet during first physical therapy

    Time frame: hour 24

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
Started7676
Completed7575
Not completed11

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score

a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at six hours following block placement. Equivalency will be defined as a difference of less than one point in either direction on the eleven-point NRS pain scale. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

Time frame:
hour 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score
units on a scalePeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score4.0 ± 2.82.8 ± 2.4
SecondaryNRS Pain Score

a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 12 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

Time frame:
hour 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
NRS Pain Score
units on a scalePeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
NRS Pain Score6.1 ± 2.45.0 ± 2.5
SecondaryNRS Pain Score

a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 18 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

Time frame:
hour 18
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
NRS Pain Score
units on a scalePeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
NRS Pain Score6.0 ± 2.85.3 ± 2.5
SecondaryNRS Pain Score

a comparison of patient-reported numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores with movement at 24 hours following block placement. Score ranges from 0-10 with a higher score denoting more pain.

Time frame:
hour 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
NRS Pain Score
units on a scalePeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
NRS Pain Score5.7 ± 2.24.6 ± 2.2
SecondaryTime in Minutes Until Opioid Administration

Time to first dose of opioid rescue for postoperative pain management - This outcome was evaluated in time to first opioid dose, which was measured in hours - no analysis for mean, median, or any of the others suggested - It was calculated as time of block to time of first opioid dose-hours and minutes.

Time frame:
hour 24
Reported as:
Mean · minutes until first dose
Time in Minutes Until Opioid Administration
minutes until first dosePeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
Time in Minutes Until Opioid Administration464.98 ± 221.67394.69 ± 158.39
SecondaryMotor Strength

straight leg raise at 6 hours after block placed rated on a 0-5 scale with a higher score indicating better movement

Time frame:
hour 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Motor Strength
units on a scalePeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
Motor Strength3.5 ± 1.62.4 ± 1.3
SecondaryDistance Ambulated

Recorded in feet during first physical therapy

Time frame:
hour 24
Reported as:
Mean · feet
Distance Ambulated
feetPeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
Distance Ambulated59.1 ± 49.643.9 ± 42.2

Adverse events

Collected over 24 hour follow up of evaluating adverse events. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)0/75 (0%)1/75 (1.3%)0/75 (0%)
Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)0/75 (0%)2/75 (2.7%)0/75 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPeri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)
Right hip dislocationMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/750/75
Pumonary embolismBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/751/75
epidural spreadMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/751/75

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years303262
>=65 years464490
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)Total
Female484391
Male283361
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)Total
Hispanic or Latino213
Not Hispanic or Latino7473147
Unknown or Not Reported022
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American538
White6971140
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Peri-capsular Nerve Group (PENG)Lumbar Plexus Block (LPB)Total
United States7676152
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Wake Forest Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 17, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Sep 21, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05261009
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 2, 2022
Start date
Jun 13, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 20, 2023
Completion
Jul 20, 2023
Results posted
Mar 18, 2024
Last update
May 21, 2024

Study contacts

Rawad Hamzi, MD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion