CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05251025Updated Feb 22, 2022

Myofascial Release and Sustained Stretching in Spastic CP Children

An interventional study of Passive sustained stretching and Myofascial Release in Cerebral Palsy, sponsored by Riphah International University. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-22.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2021, registered Feb 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this research was to find and compare the effects of Myofascial Release Technique and Passive Sustained Stretching on Hamstrings Flexibility in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy.

Read the detailed description

Randomized Clinical Trials done at DHQ Sahiwal. 26 spastic CP children of age 6-12 years were taken by random sampling technique from DHQ Sahiwal. 13 were allocated to each group. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability convenience sampling technique Group A received Passive Sustained Stretching along with conventional treatment. Whereas Group B received MFR along with conventional treatment. Both these groups received treatment for 6 weeks. The baseline and post treatment score of MAS, Goniometer (AKET to measure popliteal angle) and GMFCS -88 were evaluated. Data analysis was done by using the SPSS version 21.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

  • Spastic cerebral palsy
  • Passive Sustained Stretching
  • Myofascial Release
  • MAS
  • Goniometer
03

In context

Muscle Spasticity

704 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscle Spasticity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 36 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Muscle Spasticity.

Browse Muscle Spasticity studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age range from 6 to 12 years were included.
  • Both genders were included.
  • Ambulatory subjects with or without ambulatory aids.
  • Diagnosed children with Spastic CP.
  • CP patients with grade 3 on modified Ashworth scale for hamstrings were included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with visual or auditory defects.
  • Children with cognitive dysfunction.
  • Subjects who had severe limitations in passive range of motion at lower extremities specially hamstrings due to surgery or any other complication.
  • Children with other types of Cerebral Palsy such as Ataxic CP, Dyskinetic CP etc.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Passive sustained stretching

    Passive sustained stretching along with conventional treatments

    Other: Passive sustained stretching

  • Experimental
    Myofascial Release

    Myofascial Release Technique along with conventional treatments

    Other: Myofascial Release

Interventions

  • OtherPassive sustained stretching

    The Group A received Passive Stretching Technique. Along with the Passive Stretching Technique, this group also received certain conventional treatments which included resistive exercises, gait training exercises, bridging and exercises in other functional positions were also undertaken by the included individuals. All the exercises mentioned above were performed for 30 minutes and there was not any specific division of time for all these mentioned activities. The patients used to perform these conventional treatments and exercises on their motor control basis. The exercises were performed for 30 minutes and been done for 5 days in a week for consecutive 6 weeks.

  • OtherMyofascial Release

    The Group B received Myofascial Release Technique and along with conventional treatments. The Myofascial Release Technique for hamstrings was given to the patient in prone position. The technique was applied either by the crossed hands or thumbs. This total treatment was given for 30 minutes consecutively. After the technique the Myofascial structures were stretched and then were hold for straight 120 seconds so that the tissues get softened. The technique was given to patients with 6 repetitions and with a hold for 120 seconds. The treatment was continued for 5 days a week for straight 6 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    Modified Ashworth scale is one of the most internationally accepted clinical tool that is to measure the increased tone in the muscles. Ashworth Scale in 1964 was published by Bryan Ashworth. This clinical tool has been used as a method for grading spasticity, especially in patients with Cerebral Palsy, Multiple sclerosis etc. The reliability of Modified Ashworth Scale is(ICC+=0.686).

    Time frame: 6th week

  2. Gross Motor Function Classification System

    The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS-88) is a five-level system that is basically is considered as a standardized method to explain gross motor function in CP Children. This GMFCS is used in CP Children with age ranging from 1 to 12 years. The basic focus in this tool is the sitting and walking of the CP Children. This classification system can simply be merged into medical practice. This will help to make assessments of the affected children. It also shows major or clear differences in the gross motor functions of Cp children that are impactful in the daily activities. the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of GMFCS is 0.98 and 0.97 respectively

    Time frame: 6th week

  3. Active Knee Extension Test

    For Active Knee Extension Test that helped to measure popliteal angle the patient was asked to lie supine on the examination table with hip and the knee flexed to 90 degrees and the test was done on both legs alternatively. The examiner then supported the testing thigh so that it remained vertical and asked the patient to extend the knee actively while the contralateral leg remained extended. This active knee extension was done voluntarily. After this, the examiner held that knee extension for 5 seconds to support and keep the stretch to find the point of maximum resistance to ensure the exact readings. To measure the readings, the examiner placed a 360 degrees goniometer on the landmarks being marked for taking the readings. The landmarks used as reference for goniometer were greater trochanter of the femur and lateral malleolus of the tibia.

    Time frame: 6th week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • District Head Quarter Hospital
    Sahiwal, Punjab 57000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05251025
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 22, 2022
Start date
Jul 15, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2021
Completion
Dec 15, 2021
Last update
Feb 22, 2022

Study contacts

Sara Aabroo, PPDPT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion