CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05247944Updated Feb 21, 2022

F-BEVAR vs Open Surgery for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

An observational study in Aneurysm Aortic and Vascular Diseases, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-21.

Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
278
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study was to investigate outcomes of a propensity matched series of patients treated with F-BEVAR and open surgery repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm in two aortic high-volume centres.

Read the detailed description

This retrospective study analyzes the long-term outcomes of a propensity-matched cohort of patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysm prospectively collected between January 2010 and June 2016 from the Aortic Center of Lille (Lille, France) and the Unit of Vascular Surgery of Policlinic Gemelli (Rome, Italy).

Patients were observed with regular postoperative appointments. The long-term imaging follow-up consisted in a yearly computed tomography angiography in the F-BEVAR group; and yearly abdominal ultrasound examination and 5-year computed tomography angiography were performed in the open surgery repair group. In case of abnormal renal function (eGFR\<60 mL/min/1.73 m2), the patient underwent computed tomography without contrast associated to a contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination in both groups. Laboratory data with evaluation of renal function by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), were completed at three, six, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Survival assessment was completed after general partitioner's, patients' or patient siblings' contact by phone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aneurysm Aortic
  • Vascular Diseases

Keywords

  • F-BEVAR
  • Open surgery
  • complex abdominal aortic aneurysm
03

In context

Aneurysm

960 studies on the registry are indexed under Aneurysm; 175 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 278 is above the median of 151 across 443 observational studies indexed under Aneurysm.

Browse Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 920 studies on the registry; 529 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

A total of 157 patients, referred to the Aortic Center of Lille (France), underwent F-BEVAR treatment; 119 patients, referred to the Policlinic Gemelli in Rome (Italy), concurrently underwent OSR.

Inclusion criteria

  • juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms
  • pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms
  • suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms
  • type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • extent I to III thoracoabdominal aneurysms
  • ruptured o symptomatic aneurysms
  • dissections or connective tissue disorder aneurysms.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
278 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • F-BEVAR

    Patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) at the Aortic Center of Lille (ACL; Lille, France).

    Procedure: Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR)

  • OPEN SURGERY REPAIR

    Patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent open surgery repair the Unit of Vascular Surgery of Policlinic Gemelli (FPUG; Rome, Italy).

    Procedure: Open repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureFenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR)

    Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR)

  • ProcedureOpen repair

    Open surgery for complex abdominal aortic aneurysm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall mortality

    All cause death

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 year

  2. Aortic-related mortality

    Any death related to the initial procedure.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 year

  3. Chronic renal decline during follow-up

    Chronic renal decline was defined in patients with normal (stage 1-2) preoperative renal function as a reduction in the eGFR to \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 during follow-up. In patients with abnormal function (stages 3 and 4) preoperatively, it was defined as an eGFR reduction of \>20% or de novo dependence on permanent renal replacement therapy.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Aortic-related reintervention

    All secondary interventions related to the initial procedure or to the endograft and its target vessels during follow-up

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 year

  2. Target vessel occlusion

    Complete obstruction of the artery with no evidence of flow identified on any follow-up CT scan or duplex ultrasound.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 year

  3. Clinical failure

    Death from complications of the initial operation or a secondary intervention, aortic aneurysm rupture, aortic conversion to open surgical repair, persistent type I or III endoleak, sac expansion \>5 mm, device migration \>10mm, infection or thrombosis in the F-BEVAR group and death, graft infection or thrombosis or para-anastomotic aneurysm in the open group.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 year

  4. Proximal aorta degeneration Proximal aorta degeneration

    Diameter increase \>5 mm within 5 cm above the ostium of the more proximal target vessel for the endovascular group and 5 cm above the proximal anastomosis for the open group

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tinelli G, Crea MA, de Waure C, Di Tanna GL, Becquemin JP, Sobocinski J, Snider F, Haulon S. A propensity-matched comparison of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgical repair of pararenal and paravisceral aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):659-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.060. Epub 2018 Mar 22. PubMed 29576405 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05247944
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Collaborators
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
Responsible party
TINELLI GIOVANNI (Head of the Endovascular Therapies Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 21, 2022
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2018
Completion
Jan 2022
Last update
Feb 21, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion