CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05245617JPSUpdated Jan 30, 2026Results posted

Observational Study on JuniOrtho Plating System for Deformities and Fractures Treatment in Lower Limb

An observational study in Deformity, Defect, Congenital and Trauma, sponsored by Orthofix s.r.l.. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 1 Month and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-30.

Sponsored by Orthofix s.r.l. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30
Ages
1 Month and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Orthofix Srl put the JPS on the European market (2019) by the mean of a pre-market clinical evaluation made under the Medical Device Directive (MDD) requirements that were based on the analysis of the scientific literature of equivalent devices.

This study has been planned as part of the Orthofix Srl post-market active surveillance plan for the collection of data on both the clinical performance and the safety profile of the JPS in a representative population of Patients and users.

The rationale of the proposed study is to update and support the pre-market clinical evaluation of the JPS with real-word-evidence clinical data, in order to confirm the benefit/risk ratio of this medical device and to keep the CE mark under Medical Device Regulation (MDR) requirements.

Read the detailed description

One selected site that is experienced in the treatment of pediatric and adult patients with bone deformities and fractures, where the usage of JPS is already part of the normal clinical practice, will participate in this study. Investigator will provide data for a maximum of 40 JPS implant cases satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria (predicted drop out rate is 10%) that will contribute for at least 30 cases treated by JPS (note that some patients may contribute for more than one JPS case, according to how many JPS implants were received).

For retrospective study cohort, who has previously had JPS implanted and follow-up assessment and JPS removal is done, the investigators shall purely collect clinical data from the medical record of the subjects, concerning the screening criteria, the surgery (MD application) and 4 following events: hospital discharge, first post-application control, bone consolidation assessment and device removal. Data from patients' observation are collected according to the site standard-of-care.

Patients, who are prospectively enrolled in the study and have undergone JPS implantation, will have follow-up assessments, as described on Table 10.2, or until patient withdrawal.

The patient data will be systematically collected by the investigator in eCRF. As per CIP, the subjects will not undergo additional visit nor non-invasive, invasive or burdensome procedures additional to those performed under the normal clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deformity
  • Defect, Congenital
  • Trauma

Keywords

  • Femur
  • Tibia
  • Congenital
  • deformity
  • Plate
  • Fracture
03

In context

Congenital Abnormalities

980 studies on the registry are indexed under Congenital Abnormalities; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 153 across 446 observational studies indexed under Congenital Abnormalities.

Browse Congenital Abnormalities studies →

Lead sponsor

Orthofix s.r.l. is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This study will be conducted only on patients with a regular indication for JPS JuniOrtho Plating System as per IFU: the system is intended in pediatric (excluding newborns) and small stature adult patients. Pediatric patients include infants (greater than 1 month to 1 years of age), children (greater than 1 to 12 years of age), adolescents (greater than 12 to 18 years of age) and appropriate adults (where according to investigator assessment, the JPS plates fit the treated bone anatomy).

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: a patient will be eligible for inclusion in the study if:

  • had a regular indication for surgical intervention with JPS according to the manufacturer's IFU;
  • underwent a surgery for bone deformity correction or trauma reconstruction of the lower extremities performed by JPS;
  • the clinical data registered in her/him patient chart are sufficient to assess the safety and efficacy endpoint of the study;
  • patient (or his/her legally acceptable representative) is capable of understanding the content of the Informed Consent Form (ICF) [applicable for the prospective group of patients]
  • patient is willing and able to participate in the prospective data collection and comply with the protocol requirements;

Note: for the retrospective group of patients to whom all interventions and control visits were already done, a waiver of consent for retrospective data collection to be requested.

Exclusion Criteria: a Patient will be excluded from participation in the study if he/she:

  • had/has a medical condition that is a contraindication according to the manufacturer's instruction for use leaflet;
  • had/has a concomitant not permitted device which cannot be safely removed;
  • patient for whom there are other concurrent medical or other conditions that in opinion of the participating investigator may prevent participation or otherwise render patient ineligible for the study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • JPS treated patients

    This grup will include all patients with regular indication for JPS: system is intended in pediatric (excluding newborns) and small stature adult patients. Pediatric patients include infants (greater than 1 month to 1 years of age), children (greater than 1 to 12 years of age), adolescents (greater than 12 to 18 years of age) and appropriate adults (where according to investigator assessment, the JPS plates fit the treated bone anatomy).

    Device: JuniOrtho™ Plating System™

Interventions

  • DeviceJuniOrtho™ Plating System™

    The patient underwent surgery for the application of JPS for treatment of deformity or traumatic fracture.

    Also known as: JPS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Serious/Not Serious Adverse Event Certainly Related or Possibly Related to JPS (ADEs)

    Percentage of subjects who experience at least one adverse event (serious or non-serious) that the investigator judges as certainly or possibly related to the JPS system (ADEs). This outcome is used to assess the safety profile of the JPS system.

    Time frame: Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)

  2. Percentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Medica Device Deficiencies (MDDs)

    Percentage of subjects who experienced at least one medical device deficiency (MDD) i.e., any inadequacy, malfunction, or nonconformance of the investigational device or its accessories, during the defined observation window. This outcome is used to asses the safety profile of the JPS system.

    Time frame: Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage (%) of Subjects That Reached a Satisfactory Bone Consolidation According to Investigator's Opinion

    Percentage of subjects who achieved satisfactory bone consolidation, as judged by the investigator per protocol-defined criteria, up to the specified assessment time point. This outcome is used to asses the clinical performance of the JPS system.

    Time frame: Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)

  2. Percentage (%) of Subjects That Maintained Bone Correction Alignment According to Investigator's Opinion

    Percentage of subjects who maintained bone correction alignment, as assessed by the investigator per protocol-defined criteria, up tp the specified follow-up time point. Note: This outcome is calculated only for the subgroup "JPS-Treated Patients for Deformity Correction.", that is the only patients that present a correction alignment. This outcome is used to asses the clinical performance of the JPS system.

    Time frame: Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)

07

Results

Posted Jan 8, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneJPS Treated Patients
Started30
Completed29
Not completed1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Serious/Not Serious Adverse Event Certainly Related or Possibly Related to JPS (ADEs)

Percentage of subjects who experience at least one adverse event (serious or non-serious) that the investigator judges as certainly or possibly related to the JPS system (ADEs). This outcome is used to assess the safety profile of the JPS system.

Time frame:
Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Serious/Not Serious Adverse Event Certainly Related or Possibly Related to JPS (ADEs)
percentage of subjectsJPS Treated Patients
Percentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Serious/Not Serious Adverse Event Certainly Related or Possibly Related to JPS (ADEs)3.3 (0.1 to 17.4)
PrimaryPercentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Medica Device Deficiencies (MDDs)

Percentage of subjects who experienced at least one medical device deficiency (MDD) i.e., any inadequacy, malfunction, or nonconformance of the investigational device or its accessories, during the defined observation window. This outcome is used to asses the safety profile of the JPS system.

Time frame:
Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Medica Device Deficiencies (MDDs)
percentage of subjectsJPS Treated Patients
Percentage (%) of Subjects With at Least One Medica Device Deficiencies (MDDs)70.0 (50.4 to 85.4)
SecondaryPercentage (%) of Subjects That Reached a Satisfactory Bone Consolidation According to Investigator's Opinion

Percentage of subjects who achieved satisfactory bone consolidation, as judged by the investigator per protocol-defined criteria, up to the specified assessment time point. This outcome is used to asses the clinical performance of the JPS system.

Time frame:
Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage (%) of Subjects That Reached a Satisfactory Bone Consolidation According to Investigator's Opinion
percentage of subjectsJPS Treated Patients
Percentage (%) of Subjects That Reached a Satisfactory Bone Consolidation According to Investigator's Opinion96.7 (82.6 to 99.9)
SecondaryPercentage (%) of Subjects That Maintained Bone Correction Alignment According to Investigator's Opinion

Percentage of subjects who maintained bone correction alignment, as assessed by the investigator per protocol-defined criteria, up tp the specified follow-up time point. Note: This outcome is calculated only for the subgroup "JPS-Treated Patients for Deformity Correction.", that is the only patients that present a correction alignment. This outcome is used to asses the clinical performance of the JPS system.

Time frame:
Up to 18 months from surgery (at device removal)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage (%) of Subjects That Maintained Bone Correction Alignment According to Investigator's Opinion
percentage of subjectsJPS-Treated Patients for Deformity Correction
Percentage (%) of Subjects That Maintained Bone Correction Alignment According to Investigator's Opinion96.3 (80.9 to 99.9)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from treatment through the last available follow-up for each patient, with a maximum follow-up duration of up to 18 months, in accordance with site standard practice.. Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
JPS Treated Patients0/30 (0%)2/30 (6.7%)4/30 (13.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventJPS Treated Patients
Delayed union, nonunion, malunionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/30
Events caused by anesthesia and surgerySurgical and medical procedures1/30
Loosening of the implant and loss of fixationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/30
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventJPS Treated Patients
Events caused by anesthesia and surgerySurgical and medical procedures4/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)JPS Treated Patients
Age at surgery19.9 ± 6.3
Age at ICF signature21.1 ± 6.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)JPS Treated Patients
Female19
Male11
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)JPS Treated Patients
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)JPS Treated Patients
Germany30
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Orthopädische Klinik Volmarstein
    Wetter, Ruhr 58300, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Joeris A, Audige L, Ziebarth K, Slongo T. The Locking Compression Paediatric Hip Plate: technical guide and critical analysis. Int Orthop. 2012 Nov;36(11):2299-306. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1643-1. Epub 2012 Aug 26. PubMed 22923267 ↗
  • Sidler-Maier CC, Reidy K, Huber H, Dierauer S, Ramseier LE. LCP 140 degrees Pediatric Hip Plate for fixation of proximal femoral valgisation osteotomy. J Child Orthop. 2014 Feb;8(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s11832-014-0550-y. Epub 2014 Jan 28. PubMed 24488843 ↗
  • Masquijo JJ. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014 May;23(3):207-11. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000036. PubMed 24500423 ↗
  • Xu Y, Bian J, Shen K, Xue B. Titanium elastic nailing versus locking compression plating in school-aged pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11568. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011568. PubMed 30024559 ↗
  • Islam SU, Henry A, Khan T, Davis N, Zenios M. The outcome of paediatric LCP hip plate use in children with and without neuromuscular disease. Musculoskelet Surg. 2014 Dec;98(3):233-9. doi: 10.1007/s12306-013-0308-6. Epub 2013 Dec 3. PubMed 24297691 ↗
  • Zheng P, Yao Q, Xu P, Wang L. Application of computer-aided design and 3D-printed navigation template in Locking Compression Pediatric Hip PlateTauMu placement for pediatric hip disease. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017 May;12(5):865-871. doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1535-3. Epub 2017 Feb 11. PubMed 28190127 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 23, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 11, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05245617
Lead sponsor
Orthofix s.r.l.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2022
Start date
Nov 16, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 19, 2024
Completion
Apr 19, 2024
Results posted
Jan 8, 2026
Last update
Jan 30, 2026

Study contacts

Benedikt Leidinger, MD
principal investigator · Orthopädische Klinik Volmarstein

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion