CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05230641CADPONSUpdated Jul 7, 2023

Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Perioperative Outcomes

An observational study in Neurosurgical Patients, sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, India. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-07.

Sponsored by National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, India · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is cardinal for maintaining systemic homeostasis and is pivotal for the baseline regulation and modulation of vital cardiovascular, hemodynamic, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and body temperature regulating functions. Pathological perturbations of the ANS leading to cardiac dysautonomia (CAD) affect one in 1000 population. Autonomic dysfunction can occur from a variety of pathological conditions such as ischemic heart disease, systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, neurological illnesses, neurotrauma, and cervical spine diseases. When patients with dysautonomia present for surgical procedures, they may manifest severe hemodynamic responses that may be less responsive to pharmacological interventions. Pre-existing autonomic dysfunction accentuates perioperative hemodynamic fluctuations during stressful events like direct laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation, and extubation, and can result in major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The complications arising from CAD can prolong the duration of hospital stay and contribute to morbidity and mortality. Preoperative diagnosis of CAD helps in anticipation of and preparation for potentially severe adverse events in the perioperative period. Most neurosurgical patients are not candidates for detailed ANS examination in the supine and standing positions due to their underlying neurological condition. Real-time assessment of heart rate variability (HRV) using the ANSiscope equipment provides information on the sympathovagal balance during the immediate preoperative period and aids in the simple rapid bedside assessment of CAD. This study aims to examine the incidence of CAD through HRV assessment in neurosurgical patients, identify the potential risk factors for CAD in this population, and evaluate the impact of CAD on perioperative outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Demographic and baseline clinical data including comorbid conditions and medication history will be collected. Baseline hemodynamic parameters - heart rate (HR) and systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (SBP, DBP, MAP), rate pressure product (RPP) calculated as the product of HR and SBP and ANSindex (which informs the degree of dysautonomia and is derived noninvasively from a recording of 572 R wave to R wave intervals on an electrocardiogram) will be recorded in the immediate preoperative period.

Assessment of risk factors for preoperative CAD The investigators will explore potential risk factors for CAD in neurosurgical patients. The investigators postulate some known factors such as anxiety which will be diagnosed using the Visual analog scale for anxiety (VAS-A), age, gender, neurosurgical pathology, site-specific surgery (high cervical pathology, structural brain lesions, brainstem lesion, etc.), pre-existing diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and medications used for their treatment, higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) grade, etc. to be associated with CAD in neurosurgical patients.

The investigators will explore the association between CAD and perioperative outcomes. Major Adverse Cardiac Events during Intra and postoperative period, in-hospital mortality, and duration of postoperative ICU and hospital stay.

Anesthesia will be administered as per the existing practice. Hemodynamic parameters HR, SBP, DBP, MAP at following time points - before and 1 and 2 min after induction of general anesthesia, before and at 1, 3, and 5 mins after tracheal intubation, and before and at 1, 3, and 5 mins after skull pin application, where applicable. Adverse hemodynamic events - persistent hypotension, arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, cardiac failure, cardiac arrest) during the early (after anesthetic induction and before surgical incision), late (surgical incision to surgical closure) intraoperative period, recovery period (end of anesthesia to discharge from the operating room), post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) period (from arrival to discharge from PACU) and early postoperative period (up to 72 hours after surgery), neurological status (Glasgow Coma Scale) at hospital discharge, and duration of ICU and hospital stay will be recorded. The core temperature will be monitored during the intraoperative period to detect hypothermia (\<35o C) or hyperthermia (>37.5 o C).

Sample size and statistical analysis Previous studies in the non-neurosurgical populations have determined the prevalence of CAD to vary from 25 to 73%. Considering an average prevalence of 50% in the neurosurgical population and a possible 5% margin of error, a sample size of 383 would be necessary for achieving a 95% confidence level. Hence the investigators plan to recruit 400 patients over a period of 1 year to account for potential dropouts from the study.

Data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) or R software. Continuous variables will be compared by t-test, qualitative data by chi2 test, or Fisher exact test. Logistic regression will be used to identify the risk factors for cardiac autonomic dysfunction. A p \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurosurgical Patients

Keywords

  • cardiac dysautonomia
  • neurosurgery
  • heart rate variability
  • hypotension
  • anesthesia
  • major adverse cardiac events
  • perioperative outcome
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consenting patients scheduled for neurosurgical procedures at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru will be recruited if they fulfill the study inclusion criteria during the period of study duration

Inclusion criteria

  • aged between 18 and 80 years
  • belonging to ASA grade 1-4
  • scheduled for craniotomies or spinal surgeries under anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • scheduled for redo procedures
  • patients with preoperative arrhythmias and cardiac failure
  • patients on preoperative inotropic support
  • pregnant neurosurgical patients
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    This is a prospective observational study

    Also known as: No interventions

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in neurosurgical patients

    To study the prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in neurosurgical patients

    Time frame: Before anesthesia administration for surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Risk factors of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in neurosurgical patients

    To identify risk factors of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in neurosurgical patients

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on hemodynamic stress response

    To assess the impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on hemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, anesthetic induction, and tracheal extubation

    Time frame: During anesthesia procedure for surgery

  3. Impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on hemodynamic instability

    To assess the impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on incidence, duration and severity of intraoperative hypotension and hypertension and requirement of pharmacological intervention

    Time frame: During surgery

  4. Impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on Major Adverse Cardiac Events

    To assess the impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on Major Adverse Cardiac Events namely, new onset myocardial ischemia, congestive cardiac failure, cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac arrest requiring resuscitation

    Time frame: During and after surgery till discharge from the hospital, an average of 1 week

  5. Impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on temperature instability

    To assess the impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on incidence of hypothermia and hyperthermia

    Time frame: During surgery

  6. Impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on duration of hospital stay

    To assess the impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on duration of ICU and hospital stay

    Time frame: After surgery till the time of discharge from the hospital, an average of 1 week

  7. Impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on in-hospital mortality

    To assess the impact of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on in-hospital mortality

    Time frame: After surgery till the time of discharge from the hospital, an average of 1 week

06

Study locations

1 site
  • NIMHANS hospital
    Bangalore, Karnataka 560029, India
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Chakraborty T, Kramer CL, Wijdicks EFM, Rabinstein AA. Dysautonomia in Guillain-Barre Syndrome: Prevalence, Clinical Spectrum, and Outcomes. Neurocrit Care. 2020 Feb;32(1):113-120. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00781-w. PubMed 31297663 ↗
  • McGrane S, Atria NP, Barwise JA. Perioperative implications of the patient with autonomic dysfunction. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;27(3):365-70. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000072. PubMed 24722004 ↗
  • Keyl C, Lemberger P, Palitzsch KD, Hochmuth K, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction and hemodynamic response to anesthetic induction in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Anesth Analg. 1999 May;88(5):985-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199905000-00004. PubMed 10320156 ↗
  • Polderman JAW, Sperna Weiland NH, Klaver MH, Biginski J, Horninge M, Hollmann MW, DeVries JH, Immink RV, Preckel B, Hermanides J. The prevalence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and its influence on post induction hemodynamic variables in patients with and without diabetes; A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207384. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30475825 ↗
  • Hogan AM, Luck C, Woods S, Ortu A, Petkov S. The Effect of Orthostatic Hypotension Detected Pre-Operatively on Post-Operative Outcome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Mar;69(3):767-772. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16966. Epub 2020 Dec 11. PubMed 33314116 ↗
  • Mustafa HI, Fessel JP, Barwise J, Shannon JR, Raj SR, Diedrich A, Biaggioni I, Robertson D. Dysautonomia: perioperative implications. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan;116(1):205-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823db712. PubMed 22143168 ↗
  • Cheshire WP, Freeman R, Gibbons CH, Cortelli P, Wenning GK, Hilz MJ, Spies JM, Lipp A, Sandroni P, Wada N, Mano T, Kim HA, Kimpinski K, Iodice V, Idiaquez J, Thaisetthawatkul P, Coon EA, Low PA, Singer W. Corrigendum to "Electrodiagnostic assessment of the autonomic nervous system: A consensus statement endorsed by the American Autonomic Society, American Academy of Neurology, and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 132(2) (2021) 666-682]. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 May;132(5):1194. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Mar 6. No abstract available. PubMed 33685802 ↗
  • Farbood A, Sahmeddini MA, Bayat S, Karami N. The effect of preoperative depression and anxiety on heart rate variability in women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2020 Sep;27(5):912-918. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01087-y. Epub 2020 Apr 7. PubMed 32266603 ↗
  • Abhishekh HA, Nisarga P, Kisan R, Meghana A, Chandran S, Trichur Raju, Sathyaprabha TN. Influence of age and gender on autonomic regulation of heart. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Jun;27(3):259-64. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9424-3. Epub 2013 Jan 8. PubMed 23297094 ↗
  • Katsanos AH, Korantzopoulos P, Tsivgoulis G, Kyritsis AP, Kosmidou M, Giannopoulos S. Electrocardiographic abnormalities and cardiac arrhythmias in structural brain lesions. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 31;167(2):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.06.107. Epub 2012 Jul 16. PubMed 22809542 ↗
  • Ideguchi M, Kajiwara K, Yoshikawa K, Sadahiro H, Nomura S, Fujii M, Suzuki M. Characteristics of intraoperative abnormal hemodynamics during resection of an intra-fourth ventricular tumor located on the dorsal medulla oblongata. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53(10):655-62. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa2012-0401. Epub 2013 Sep 27. PubMed 24077276 ↗
  • Padley JR, Ben-Menachem E. Low pre-operative heart rate variability and complexity are associated with hypotension after anesthesia induction in major abdominal surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Apr;32(2):245-252. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0012-4. Epub 2017 Mar 14. PubMed 28293808 ↗
  • Knuttgen D, Weidemann D, Doehn M. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy: abnormal cardiovascular reactions under general anesthesia. Klin Wochenschr. 1990 Dec 4;68(23):1168-72. doi: 10.1007/BF01815272. PubMed 2280579 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data will be available with the Principal Investigator and shared with other researchers on request.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05230641
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, India
Collaborators
Vision Group on Science and Technology, DyAnsys, Inc.
Responsible party
RP Sangeetha (Dr., National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, India) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 9, 2022
Start date
Mar 1, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2023
Completion
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
Jul 7, 2023

Study contacts

Sangeetha RP
principal investigator · National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, India

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion