CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05192278Updated Jan 14, 2022

Comparison of Different Volumes Spread of Erector Spinae Block in Post Mastectomy Pain Syndrome Management

A Phase 2 interventional study of erector spinae block in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Mansoura University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-14.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Cancer breast is one of the most common tumors among women and surgery is still the key for its management and cure. Post-mastectomy pain control is crucial as acute postoperative pain is a significant factor in the development of persistent chronic pain in the form of post-mastectomy pain syndrome.

Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a common complication after breast cancer surgery and is often challenging to manage. It is estimated that PMPS occurs in 20%-44% of patients after breast surgery.

Adequate pain control for PMPS has become one of the most important goals and recently can achieve by multiple tools including multimodal analgesia and regional techniques.

Erector spinae block (ESB) is one of the new described regional techniques. Although its mechanism is not clear, the published data agree that it is promising block for chronic and acute pain and its simplicity and safety compared with thoracic epidural or bilateral paravertebral blocks.

ESB can be performed using a superficial approach between the large rhomboid muscle and the erector spinae muscle or the deep method beneath the erector spinae.

The use of the ESPB for chronic pain has recently expanded for various neuropathic pain conditions. Also, it reported with several volumes range from 10 to 30 ml of total volume.

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized open comparative study will be conducted in pain clinic, Mansoura University Hospitals. The study will be approved by the Ethics Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University and will be carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed written consent will be signed from every patient participating in this study after full description of all details of every aspect in this study.

Patients more than 18 years old of both genders with PMPS not responding to medical treatments, and numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain)., American society of Anesthesiology Physical Status class I and II, and Body mass index ˂ 30 were included in this study.

The exclusion criteria are patient refusal, local or systemic sepsis, coagulopathy, unstable cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, previous neurological deficits, history of psychiatric disorders, history of drug abuse, distorted local anatomy, and those who were allergic to the used medications were excluded from the study.

All the patients will inform about the numerical rating score (NRS) from zero to 10 (where 0 no pain, 10 the worst pain) to describe their pain.

Random selection of patients:

The study participants were randomly grouped on a scale of 1:1, using a computer-generated list of random numbers. The distribution results were sealed in an opaque envelope and kept by the study administrator. On the day of block, the study manager handed the envelope to the anesthesiologist who will perform the block.

Grouping:

Group A: receive ESR with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 7 ml saline 0.9% (total 20 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

Group B: receive ESR with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 12 ml saline 0.9% (total 30 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients more than 18 years old of both genders
  • with post-mastectomy pain syndrome not responding to medical treatments,
  • and numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 that ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain).,
  • American society of Anesthesiology Physical Status class I and II,
  • and Body mass index ˂ 30 were included in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal,
  • local or systemic sepsis,
  • coagulopathy,
  • unstable cardiovascular
  • and respiratory diseases,
  • previous neurological deficits,
  • history of psychiatric disorders,
  • history of drug abuse,
  • distorted local anatomy,
  • and those who were allergic to the used medications
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 20 ml

    receive ESB with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 7 ml saline 0.9% (total 20 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

    Other: erector spinae block

  • Active comparator
    Group 30 ml

    receive ESB with 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 12 ml saline 0.9% (total 30 ml with bupivacaine 0.25%).

    Other: erector spinae block

Interventions

  • Othererector spinae block

    The patients will do the procedure under fluoroscopic guidance. The patients were placed in prone position. After the identification of the T4 transverse process, the targeted injection site was anesthetized with 3-4 ml of 2% lidocaine. A 25-gauge spinal needle was advanced until it contacted the transverse process at the T4 level. Next, a solution of 1mL of methylprednisolone 40mg/mL with 7 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2mL of nonionic contrast in 10 ml saline 0.9% (group A) and in 20 ml saline 0.9% (group B) will injected. Then another photo will be taken with the fluoroscopy to determine the level of spread in each group. After finished, the patients will transfer to the post-operative care unit and will monitored for any complication for one hour.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The level spread of each volume.

    The level spread of each volume.

    Time frame: immediately after injection. C arm photo will be taken to know the level of distribution

  2. Numerical analogue scale

    from 0 (no pain) to 10 (sever pain)

    Time frame: after 4 weeks from procedure

  3. Numerical analogue scale

    from 0 (no pain) to 10 (sever pain)

    Time frame: after 8 weeks from procedure

  4. Numerical analogue scale

    from 0 (no pain) to 10 (sever pain)

    Time frame: after 12 weeks from procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    evaluated by using a linear scale in which 0 is very dissatisfied and 10 is very satisfied.

    Time frame: after 4 weeks from the procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05192278
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Nevert Adel (assist. prof. of anesthesia and pain management, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 14, 2022
Start date
Dec 12, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 14, 2022

Study contacts

yahya m wahba, assist professor
Contact
yahyawahba@ymail.com
01211313554
ghada F Amer
Contact
ghadafouad2018@gmail.com
01008081333

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion