ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05188183PLP-EVERESTUpdated Sep 19, 2025

Pragmatic Trial of Remote tDCS and Somatosensory Training for Phantom Limb Pain With Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response

An interventional study of M1 anodal home-based tDCS and Somatosensory Training in Phantom Limb Pain, sponsored by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
290
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators have designed a pragmatic trial of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for phantom limb pain (PLP), the PLP-EVEREST trial (PLP-EffectiVEness pRagmatic Stimulation Trial) to test a portable device that would reach underrepresented populations and would validate this therapy in a more pragmatic setting. Subjects will be randomized to home-based tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) with somatosensory training or usual care only (including their current pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, and occupational therapy). The investigators will therefore test the effectiveness of home-based tDCS and somatosensory training in a real-world, home-based setting. The Investigator will compare patients randomized to this combined strategy vs. usual care alone (subjects from this group will be offered combined treatment at the end of the trial). The investigators hypothesize that the combined strategy will be associated with a significantly larger Cohen's d effect size (at least 1) compared to the control group.

Read the detailed description

The investigators have designed a pragmatic trial of home-based tDCS for PLP, the PLP-EVEREST trial (PLP-EffectiVEness pRagmatic Stimulation Trial) to test a portable device that would reach underrepresented populations and would validate this therapy in a more pragmatic setting. Subjects will be randomized to home-based tDCS of the M1 with somatosensory training or usual care only (including their current pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, and occupational therapy). The investigators will therefore test the effectiveness of home-based tDCS and somatosensory training in a real-world, home-based setting. The investigator will compare patients randomized to this combined strategy vs. usual care alone (subjects from this group will be offered combined treatment at the end of the trial). The investigators hypothesize that the combined strategy will be associated with a significantly larger Cohen's d effect size (at least 1) compared to the control group.

The investigators will perform a pragmatic, parallel randomized clinical trial. Investigators will recruit 290 participants with upper and/or lower bilateral or unilateral limb amputation and phantom limb pain in the chronic phase. All participants will be randomized to receive 20 daily sessions (4 weeks) of active anodal M1 home-based tDCS combined with somatosensory training or usual care. The participants will participate in 23 visits over 12 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Phantom Limb Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Phantom Limb

163 studies on the registry are indexed under Phantom Limb; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 290 is above the median of 30 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Phantom Limb.

Browse Phantom Limb studies →

Lead sponsor

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital is the lead sponsor of 117 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Of its 20 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (85%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age - older than 18 years
  2. Limb amputation
  3. Patients who experience PLP regularly (at least once a week)
  4. Pain not attributable to other causes, such as peripheral inflammation
  5. Current chronic pain as defined by an average pain of at least 4 on the numeric rating scale (NRS, 0: no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder
  2. History of substance abuse in the past 6 months (according to the criteria for substance use disorder with six or more symptoms)
  3. Uncompensated psychiatric disorder
  4. Previous significant neurological history with current significant neurological deficits
  5. Previous neurosurgical procedure with craniectomy that would affect current distribution of tDCS
  6. to tDCS (implanted brain medical devices)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
290 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    M1 anodal home-based tDCS and somatosensory training

    Investigators will use the Soterix Medical 1X1 tDCS mini-CT stimulator device (© Soterix Medical Inc.) an home-based tDCS device used in several clinical trials with no adverse events. It sends a low-level current from the positive electrode, anode, to the negative electrode, cathode. During tDCS, low amplitude direct currents are applied via scalp electrodes and penetrate the skull to enter the brain. HB-TDCS will be combined with somatosensory training that will be performed during the self-administration of tDCS, including 20 sessions over 4 weeks.

    Device: M1 anodal home-based tDCS · Behavioral: Somatosensory Training

  • Experimental
    Usual Care

    Usual care includes pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, occupational therapy and/or behavioral therapy that the subject is receiving.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • DeviceM1 anodal home-based tDCS

    During tDCS, low amplitude direct currents are applied via scalp electrodes and penetrate the skull to enter the brain. Direct current will be transferred by a saline-soaked pair of surface sponge electrodes (35 cm2) and delivered by a specially developed, battery-driven, constant current stimulator with a maximum output of 10 mA.

  • BehavioralSomatosensory Training

    The somatosensory training will be performed during the self-administration of tDCS, including 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Sessions will start with relaxation exercises using a body scan technique, whereby subjects in a relaxed state will be instructed to sequentially interchange their mind to different regions of the body while perceiving it and establishing contact with the body part. Subjects will be asked to concentrate on any feeling (kinetic, kinesthetic or exteroceptive) related to each body part. Phantom exercises will involve the use of imagined movements of the phantom limb. Therefore, patients will be asked to perform general exercises with their phantom limb. Exercises will include hip, knee, ankle, and toe movements.

  • OtherUsual Care

    Usual care includes pharmacological treatments, physical therapy, occupational therapy and/or behavioral therapy that the subject is receiving.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Phantom Limb Pain

    The VAS is a common assessment that asks subjects to self-reportedly measure their pain on a visual scale (i.e., unbearable to none). Investigators will use the VAS to determine subjects' pain scores. Subjects will rate their pain from 0 - indicating no pain at all, to 10 - indicating the worst pain felt. This scale is also colored, from green (at 0) to red (at 10), as a visual indicator of pain. This assessment tool is frequently used in many research studies evaluating pain levels in phantom limb.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Visit 22 (at 4 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Upon completion of the trial and after publication of the primary manuscript, the investigators plan to publish the de-identified dataset following the guidelines of our institution (Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital/Partners Healthcare and Harvard Medical School).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 57 months after the start.

Of 61 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Phantom Limb, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 57 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 10, 2021
First posted
Jan 12, 2022
StartActual
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05188183
Responsible party
Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD, MPH (Director of Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 12, 2022
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Felipe Fregni, MD, PhD, MPH, MMSc
Contact
ffregni@partners.org
617-952-6158
Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, MS, MSc, MPH
Contact
kpachecobarrios@mgh.harvard.edu
617-952-6195

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion